Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 18 of about 257 results (0.010 seconds)Gopi Chand Vs. Sabia Naz
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 236/2010 10th September, 2014 ..... Petitioner GOPI CHAND Through Mr.Praveen Chauhan with Mr.Yash Prakash, Advocates. versus SABIA NAZ Through ..... Respondent Mr.Diwan Singh Chauhan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugns the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 03.8.2010 by which the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant in the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlady under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act has been dismissed and eviction has been ordered with respect to the tenanted premises comprising of one shop at the ground floor and two rooms on the first floor at property no.5389, New Market, Sadar Bazar, Delhi (as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the evictio...
Tag this Judgment!C.S Vaidyanathan Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TEST.CAS. 29/2013 Decided on :10. 09.2014 + C.S VAIDYANATHAN .... Petitioner Through: Mr.Harish V.Shankar and Mr.Shashank, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Nemo. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of Probate of Will dated 15.05.2009 of Shri Madanjeet Singh in which the petitioner has been named as executor.2. Briefly stated that facts of the case are that the present petitioner has claimed himself to have been appointed as the executor of the Will dated 15.05.2009 of Shri Madanjeet Singh, Indian Citizen, Ordinary resident of Villa Surya, 23, Bd, Alsacre Lorraine 063310, Beaulieu-surMer, France.3. The present petition has been filed for grant of Probate in respect to the last Will and Testament of Shri Madanjeet Singh who died on 06.01.2013. He was an Indian citizen but ordinary resident of Villa Surya, 23, Bd, Alsacr...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Panchal and ors Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 866/2014 Decided on :10. 09.2014 IN THE MATTER OF ANIL KUMAR PANCHAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. K.C.Dubey, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Gursharan Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr. Anil Kumar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R-2 & 3/Discom. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by 12 petitioners praying inter alia that respondent No.1/Govt. of NCT of Delhi and the respondent No.2 & 3/Discom be directed to bring them on the roll of the Discom, pay them all consequential benefits and provide them all facilities as are available respondents/Discom. to the regular employees of the Further, the petitioners seek continuity of service with seniority and consequential benefits.2. The petitioners claim that they were appointed and working in different posts with the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB), when it was unbundl...
Tag this Judgment!Ex-swr Girdhari Lal Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3849/2013 EX-SWR GIRDHARI LAL YADAV ....Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Sharma & Ms. Monica Negi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Barkha Babbar & Mr. M.P. Singh, Advocates for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER0909.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 13.12.2011 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek the following reliefs:a) Issue a writ of certiorari to:i. ii. W.P. (C) 3849/2013 Summon original records of the case, inclusive of original SCM proceedings, court of inquiry and hearing of the charge as per Army Rule 22; Quash judgment dated 13.12.2011 Annexure P-1, passed by The Armed Forces Tribunal (Principal Bench), upholding the Page 1 of 8 iii. iv.2. SCM proceedings; Quash SCM proceedings Anne...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : September 02, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : September 09, 2014 + Crl.A.907/2012 KRISHAN KUMAR @ MONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Dharmender Dagar (Retd.) Crl.A.246/2012 ANIL KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.Rohan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Dharmender Dagar (Retd.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Believing the testimony of Kulvinder Singh PW-2, the father of the deceased Bhupinder Singh, Ms.Tamanna PW-4, the fianc of Bhupinder, Ms.Anju Gulati PW-5 the maternal aunt of Tamanna and that of Umit Singh PW-7, a friend of Bhupinder Singh, the learned Trial Judge has returned a finding that the prosecution has successfu...
Tag this Judgment!Om Kumari Vs. Sanjeev Kumar Kapoor and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1977/2013 Date of decision :09. h September, 2014 % OM KUMARI Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.Manish Makhija, Advocate versus SANJEEV KUMAR KAPOOR & ORS ..... Defendant Through: Mr.R.Y. Kalia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) I.A. 16472/2013 (EXEMPTION) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. I.A. 6382/2014 3. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a judgment on admission.4. The necessary facts which have led to filing of the present suit are that the plaintiff is the mother of defendant no.1 and mother-in-law of defendant no.2. She claims ownership over the flat in question being No.80/7B, first floor, Malviya Nagar, Delhi, containing two bed rooms, one drawing room, two toilets, one kitchen and a balcony.5. According to the plaint, this flat was purchased by the plaintiff from her own funds by means of a registered GPA, S...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Razia Begum Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~9 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(OS) 2/2014 & CM No.137/2014 Reserved on :20. h August, 2014 Date of Decision:9. h September, 2014 SMT RAZIA BEGUM Through : ....Appellant Mr. S.D. Ansari, Adv. VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Mr. Shipra Shukla, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Anshuman Nayak, Advs. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR GITA MITTAL, J1 The instant appeal lays a challenge to a judgment dated 11 th October, 2013 whereby the learned Single Judge has accepted the respondents prayer for rejection of the plaint of the appellant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and dismissed the suit of the appellant. RFA(OS)No.2/2014 1 2. The plaintiff had filed the suit which was registered as CS(OS)No.509/2011 seeking the following prayers: i) that a decree of declaration with costs may very kindly be passed in favour of...
Tag this Judgment!Parveen Bhargava Vs. Jagdish Chander
Court: Delhi
$~ 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 9, 2014 + CS(OS) 1536/2010 PARVEEN BHARGAVA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. R. M. Bagai and Ms. Damini Khaira, Advocates versus JAGDISH CHANDER ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Prasoon Kumar and Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.Sistani, J., (Oral) IA No.1851/2014 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 17.9.2007. By the present application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, the plaintiff seeks amendment of the plaint. The plaintiff wishes to add paragraph 10-A.2. Mr.Bagai, counsel for the plaintiff submits that inadvertently a specific averment could not be made in the plaint that the plaintiff is ready and willing to perform his part of the agreement by paying the balance amount. The following amendment is sought That in the said reply dated 27.3.2009, the plaintiff had specifically stated that he is ready and willing to perform his ...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Ashok Kumar Jain
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 17/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini. versus ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.B.S.Rana, Mr.Vijender Bhardwaj and Mr.Satyam Sisodia, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER0909.2014 % 1. By the present petition the State seeks leave to appeal against the impugned judgment dated August 31, 2013 whereby Ashok Kumar Jain has been acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 307/452/506/342 IPC.2. The case of the prosecution is that on September 11, 2008 SI Yashpal along with Constable Satya Parkash while returning after attending a call of DD No.42B reached at D-12/68, Sector-7, Rohini where they found a large gathering and public persons were beating a person. Constable Moolchand was already present there who was trying to save the said person. They removed the public...
Tag this Judgment!Krishan Kumar @ Monu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : September 02, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : September 09, 2014 + Crl.A.907/2012 KRISHAN KUMAR @ MONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Dharmender Dagar (Retd.) Crl.A.246/2012 ANIL KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.Rohan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Dharmender Dagar (Retd.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Believing the testimony of Kulvinder Singh PW-2, the father of the deceased Bhupinder Singh, Ms.Tamanna PW-4, the fianc of Bhupinder, Ms.Anju Gulati PW-5 the maternal aunt of Tamanna and that of Umit Singh PW-7, a friend of Bhupinder Singh, the learned Trial Judge has returned a finding that the prosecution has successfu...
Tag this Judgment!