Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 29 of about 306 results (0.018 seconds)Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Sh. Rakesh Beniwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 07.2014 Pronounced on :04. 08.2014 + W.P.(C) 7423/2013, C.M. No.15903/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Ms. Zubeda Begum and Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocates. versus SH. RAKESH BENIWAL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Advocate, for Resp. No.1. Sh. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner, the Government of NCT of Delhi (hereafter called "GNCTD") in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questions an order dated 07.08.2013 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter the Tribunal), in O.A. No.1459/2012 which directed it to consider the respondents for promotion from the dates on which their immediate juniors were promoted, and also to grant them arrears of pay and consequential benefits alongwith it. W.P.(C) 7423/2013 Page 1 2. The facts su...
Tag this Judgment!Baleshwar Dass Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 04, 2014 + CRL.A. 690/1999 BALESHWAR DASS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Ms.Ritu Negi, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Lalit Kumar and ASI Rattan Lal, PS. Mandir Marg CRL.A. 43/2000 AKHILESH KUMAR MEHTA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Ms.Ritu Negi, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Lalit Kumar and ASI Rattan Lal, PS. Mandir Marg CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Akhilesh Kumar Mehta and Baleshwar Dass have been held guilty for the offence of having murdered Satish.2. The incriminating evidence leading to the finding of guilt against the two co-accused is : (i) the deceased and the accused were known to each other; (ii) accused Baleshwar Dass and deceased had stolen computer parts a...
Tag this Judgment!Staff Selection Commission Through Its Chairman Vs. Sudeep and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~19 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELH % + DECIDED ON:04. 08.2014 W.P.(C) 4832/2014 and CM Nos. 9649-50/2014 STAFF SELECTION CHAIRMAN COMMISSION THROUGH ITS .... Petitioner versus PARVEEN AND ORS ..... Respondents And + W.P.(C) 4848/2014 and CM No.9667-68/2014 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Petitioner versus SUDEEP AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr S.M. Arif, Adv. for the petitioners. Ms Zubeda Begum, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner claims to be aggrieved by an order of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 10.10.2013. The CAT by the said order set aside the final results of the recruitment process, for the post of Sub-Inspector (Executive) in Delhi Police, 2012. The CAT further directed to the authorities to draw the final results, strictly on W.P.(C) Nos. 4832 and 4848/2014 Page 1 the basis of aggregate marks ...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Parkash Bansal Vs. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Deve ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 08.2014 W.P.(C) 1251/2010 & CM No.2630/2010 HARI PARKASH BANSAL ..... Petitioner versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr K.C. Mittal and Mr Vishal Bansal. For the Respondents : Ms Renuka Arora. Mr Devendra Kumar and Mr Anjum Javed for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction against the respondents to allot an alternate industrial plot to the petitioner under the relocation scheme in lieu of closure of his unit.2. Briefly stated the relevant facts of the case are as under:2. 1 The petitioner was carrying out the work of oil expeller and operating a mill, since 1980, under the name of M/s Rishi Industries. The petitioner was carrying out the said activity in a non-conforming area under a licence issue...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Kumar @ Deepak Vs. Shiv Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.40/2014 4th August, 2014 % DINESH KUMAR @ DEEPAK Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Parthiv J Mehta and Mr. Vipul Dubey, Advocates. VERSUS SHIV KUMAR & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.778/2014(delay of 23 days) For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 23 days is allowed. CM stands disposed of. CM(M) No.40/2014 & CM No.777/14 (stay) 1. The challenge by means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the impugned orders of the trial court dated 4.9.2012 and 21.9.2013 by which the trial court has passed orders for bringing on record ie substituting the applicants as plaintiffs in place of the existing plaintiffs. The applicants claimed that on them rights have devolved in terms of an MOU to which the existing plaintiffs are parties.2. In para-9 of the impugned order dated 4.9.2012 the relev...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance Securities Ltd. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.3376/2014 Date of decision:4. h August, 2014 RELIANCE SECURITIES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil K. Kher, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sidharth Jain, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Saxena, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.11702/2014 (exemption) The application is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application is disposed of accordingly. Crl.M.C. No.3376//2014 1. By way of this petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as `Cr.P.C.) the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 07.6.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Crl. Rev. No.52/2014 titled Reliance Securities Ltd. vs. State & Anr. whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a complaint for the offence under Sections 403...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R1A * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:4. h August, 2014 W.P.(C) 7649/2011 ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sumit Bansal and Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Adv. for R1 and R3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to declare the action of the respondents, being in violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India by taking away the property of the petitioner forming part of Khasra No.561/421, ad-measuring 1 Bigha & 16 Biswas, situated in the area of Village-Saleempur Majra, Madipur, Delhi. Further seeking a direction against the respondents to restore back / hand over the possession of the aforementioned land to the petitioner.2. Mr.Sumit Bansal, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that identification of the land of the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Dixit and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3364/2014 DINESH DIXIT & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP with ASI Jagbir Singh, PS Tilak Nagar Mr. Munish Chhoker & Mr. K.C. Joshi, Advs. with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 04.08.2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners praying that the proceedings arising out of FIR No.200/2010 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi, be quashed on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State, as well as the second respondent/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. All the parties are present in person and are identified by their respective counsel.4. It is stated that the chargesheet has been filed and the matter is pending befo...
Tag this Judgment!Rastriya Prigya Sansthan Vs. Govt. of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 08.2014 W.P. (C) 8567/2010 RASTRIYA PRIGYA SANSTHAN ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.P. Gani, Mr Abhay Kant Mishra & Mr Ashutosh Mishra. For the Respondent : Ms Priya Pathania for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia seeking an appropriate direction to respondent no.1 to expedite the process of regularisation of the colony namely Louis Braille Vihar, Madan Pur Dwas, Delhi-110081. The petitioner further prays for a direction to respondent no.2 to protect the residents of Louis Braille Vihar from land mafia and unknown persons who are allegedly attempting to dispossess them of their lands.2. The petitioner is stated to be a society registered with the Registrar of Societies and is working in the field of providing education and em...
Tag this Judgment!Akhilesh Kumar Mehta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 04, 2014 + CRL.A. 690/1999 BALESHWAR DASS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Ms.Ritu Negi, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Lalit Kumar and ASI Rattan Lal, PS. Mandir Marg CRL.A. 43/2000 AKHILESH KUMAR MEHTA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Ms.Ritu Negi, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Lalit Kumar and ASI Rattan Lal, PS. Mandir Marg CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Akhilesh Kumar Mehta and Baleshwar Dass have been held guilty for the offence of having murdered Satish.2. The incriminating evidence leading to the finding of guilt against the two co-accused is : (i) the deceased and the accused were known to each other; (ii) accused Baleshwar Dass and deceased had stolen computer parts a...
Tag this Judgment!