Delhi Court August 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 28 of about 306 results (0.018 seconds)Shri Niwas and Etc Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3362/2014 SHRI NIWAS & ETC Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ram Bir Chauhan, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP with SI Arun Verma, EOW CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. No.11657/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 3362/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No.247/2011 registered at Police Station Economic Offence Wing under Sections 420/423/467/468/471 IPC read with Section 120B IPC primarily on the ground that the parties have since arrived at a settlement in terms of a Memorandum of Understanding executed between the petitioner and the second respondent/complainant on 27.11.2012 which was thereafter followed by a settlement agreement executed before the Delhi High Court Mediation a...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Rajvir Rana and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:4. h August, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.4843/2014 SH. RAJVIR RANA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Ankit Gyan and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advocates. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: .....Respondent None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the communication No.F.33[28]./3/90-94/L&B/ALT/1772 dated 02.05.2014 sent by the respondent, whereby the application seeking allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of acquired land has been rejected being time barred.2. Mr.Sanjay Sharawat, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the similar issue came before this Court in the case of Simla Devi Vs. Secretary & Ors. 140(2007) DLT474 Paragraph 3 incorporating the facts of the said judgment is as under:3. W.P. (C) 4843/2014 received land acquisition compensation as determined by the land acq...
Tag this Judgment!K.Srinivasulu Vs. M/S International Panaacea Limited and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C. No.273/2013 Reserved on:17. h July, 2014 Date of Decision:4. h August, 2014 % K. SRINIVASULU Through: ..... Petitioner None Versus M/S INTERNATIONAL PANAACEA LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The petitioner, Mr. K. Srinivasulu has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as `Cr.P.C.) against the order dated 19.12.2012 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate/CJ-02, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Case No.12/2012 titled `M/s International Panaacea Limited vs. Mr. K. Srinivasulu for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short `the Act).2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that respondent No.1/ complainant filed a complaint for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act against the petitioner on the allegations,...
Tag this Judgment!Naresh Kumar and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3360/2014 NARESH KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Davinder Hora, Advocate. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. SI Rajesh Kumar. Mr. Himanshu Dutt, Advocate for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.11655/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.3360/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.13/2012 dated 03.012.2012 registered at Police Station Gulabi Bagh under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC, since the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor, and MR. Himanshu Dutt, Advocate for the complainant, accept notice.4. Counsel for the State submits that that the chargesheet has since been filed and charges are yet to be framed by the trial cour...
Tag this Judgment!Joginder Chaudhary and ors Vs. the State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3359/2014 JOGINDER CHAUDHARY & ORS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor . SI Surinder, police station Bhajanpura (DIU/NE), Mr. A. A. Khan, Advocate for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.11654/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.3359/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.140/2014 registered under Sections 448/380/34 IPC at police station Bhajanpura, has been moved by the petitioners all of whom were accused in the said FIR, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled with the complainant, who is arrayed as respondent No.2 to this petition. The accused persons as well as the complainant are present in person in ...
Tag this Judgment!Sapphire Management Consultants Private Limited Vs. .............
Court: Delhi
$~32 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co. Appl. (M) No.116/2014 IN THE MATTER OF SAPPHIRE CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED Through: MANAGEMENT Mr. Mukesh Advocate Sukhija, CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER % 04.08.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) is in connection with a Scheme of Amalgamation(Scheme) of Sapphire Management Consultants Private Limited (hereinafter re ferred to as Transferor No.1), Silica Media Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor No.2 ) with Sapphire Limited Bizforecasting (hereinafter Company) and and Consulting referred to as their respective Private Transferee shareholders (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Applicant Companies) and their respective ================================================ CO. Appl. (M) No.116/2014 1 Shareholders and Creditors. A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the Applicati...
Tag this Judgment!Vijay Kumar Ahluwalia and ors. Vs. Sh. Bishan Chand Maheswari and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC REV No.76/2013 & CM No.3147/2013 (stay) 4th August, 2014 % VIJAY KUMAR AHLUWALIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.S.Kela, Advocate. VERSUS SH. BISHAN CHAND MAHESWARI & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Maheshwari and Mr. Navin Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the impugned judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 13.8.2012 by which the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant has been dismissed and the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act for bonafide necessity has been decreed with respect to one shop on the ground floor of the property bearing No.1548/V, Nai Sarak, Delhi-06 as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed alongwith the eviction...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. S. Shalu Constructions Private Ltd. Vs. Bharat Jee Kohli and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: August 04, 2014 + I.A. No.12426/2014 in CS(OS) No.69/2011 M/S S. SHALU CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Dinesh Garg, Advocate. versus BHARAT JEE KOHLI & ANR. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Vivek Srivastava, Adv for D-1. Ms.Suman Kapoor, Adv for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of this order I propose to decide application being I.A. No.12426/2014 under Order 18 Rule 3 and 17 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff.2. It is stated in the application that the defendants had entered into a collaboration agreement dated 1st June, 2010 read with collaboration agreement dated 22nd October, 2010, with the plaintiff to develop the property bearing No.A-42, N.D.S.E. Part-II, New Delhi, measuring 250 sq.yds. When the defendants failed to perform their part of obligations, the plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit for specific performance. Out of the agreed consi...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Gurnam Kaur Vs. Sh. Pritam Singh Bhatia
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:4. h August, 2014 + I.A.18838/2013 (u/s. 151 CPC for directions) in CS(OS) 1350/1995 MRS. GURNAM KAUR Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Manish Vashisht Advocate with Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Advocate versus SH. PRITAM SINGH BHATIA ..... Defendant Through Mr. Vijay K. Gupta, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Abhay Pratap Singh, Advocate for D-5. Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for D-6 to D-8. Dr. N. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate for proposed Defendant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL1 By virtue of this order, I propose to dispose of this application preferred by Defendant No.1 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) with the following prayers:(a) Applicant/Defendant No.1 and legal heirs of Defendant No.2 may kindly be permitted to file written statement and documents in support of their claim; (b) Proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 may kindly be initiated against the contemnors as detailed and described in the present app...
Tag this Judgment!Niranjan Kumar Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 22, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 04, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1467/2011 NIRANJAN KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Krishan Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Deepak Vohra, Advocate versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Harish Kumar and SI Badri Prasad, PS Connaught Place CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 1:20 hours in the intervening night of December 10 and December 11, 2005, HC Lahari Singh PW-11, recorded DD No.32A, Ex.PW-11/A, noting therein that Birender Kumar Bhardwaj, Chief Security Officer of Shangri La Hotel, has informed over the telephone that a person is lying unconscious in the shopping complex of the hotel.2. A copy of aforesaid DD entry was handed over to SI Pramod Kumar PW-34, for investigation upon which accompanied by Ct.Banwari ...
Tag this Judgment!