Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 21 of about 432 results (0.022 seconds)Goods Shepherd Public School Vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on April 21, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2354/2014 GOODS SHEPHERD PUBLIC SCHOOL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Pratap Sahani, Advocate versus EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.R.C.Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated October 31, 2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, in short) in an appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated March 10, 2011 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Orissa (Commissioner, in short), whereby the Commissioner has decided the applicability of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (Act, in short) to the appellant-Establishment for the period 06/2004 to 03/2009 and rejected the appeal, holding that the employees strength of the Establishment reached the figure of 20 in the month of June...
Tag this Judgment!A.i.i.M.S. New Delhi Vs. Uddal and ors.
Court: Delhi
R-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date: April 21, 2014 + W.P.(C) 870/2003 A.I.I.M.S. NEW DELHI Through .....Petitioner Mr.Razat Katyal and Mr. Rishab Kaushik, Advocates. versus UDDAL & ORS. Through ..... Respondent Mr.Ashok Gurnani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition is filed challenging the Award dated 30.03.2002 passed by the Labour Court holding that the workmen in question Shri Uddal Singh and Sh. Desh Pal have put in more than five years and four years of continuous service respectively under the Management when their services were terminated and that they are entitled to protection under Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. The workman Uddal Singh (respondent No.1) states that he joined employment of the petitioner on 21.01.1987 as daily wager Beldar in the Engineering Services Department where he is stated to have worked up to 21.02.1992 continuously without any break. He states that he ...
Tag this Judgment!S.E Investments Limited Vs. Intercon Infotech Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 04.2014 CO. PET. 98/2012 S.E INVESTMENTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus INTERCON INFOTECH PVT LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr P. Nagesh. : Mr Sangram Patnaik & Ms Tania Sharma. Ms Megha Bharara, proxy counsel for Ms Ruchi Sindhwani for Official Liquidator. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) CA No.1733/2013 1. This is an application filed by the respondent company seeking recall/stay/modification of the orders dated 17.01.2013 and 08.05.2013. By the order dated 17.01.2013, the petition was admitted and the Official liquidator was appointed as a Provisional Liquidator. Mr Sangram Patnaik, learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that he/Tania Sharma would file a Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant (respondent company) within two days.2. The applicant states that there was no liability towards the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Rajan Malhotra Vs. Allahabad Bank
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA Nos.234/2013 & 161/2013 21st April, 2014 % 1. RSA No.234/2013 RAJAN MALHOTRA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Arjun Krishnan, Advocate. Versus ALLAHABAD BANK2 Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Gautam, Advocate with Ms. Arpita Seth, Advocate. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajesh Gautam, Advocate with Ms. Arpita Seth, Advocate. RSA No.161/2013 ALLAHABAD BANK Versus RAJAN MALHOTRA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Arjun Krishnan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RSA No.161/2013 and C.M. No.12404/2013 (stay) 1(i) This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-bank impugning the judgment of the first appellate court dated 27.5.2013 by which the first appellate court partly allowed the appeal against the judgment of the trial court dated 1.12.2005. The trial court by its judgment dated 1.12.2005 while directing re-appointment of the respondent/plaintiff directed the ap...
Tag this Judgment!Maya Devi Gupta Vs. Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
S.C. Jain, Member: 1) This complaint has been filed by the complainant under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Facts of the case are that an œAccident Guard Policy? No. 0200005250 was obtained by Sh. Mahesh Chand Gupta Son of the complainant from the OP Insurance Company and a premium of Rs. 14,555/- was paid. The policy was effective from 17.09.2002 to 16.09.2003. OP insurance company issued the receipt No. 01-00-00011108 dt. 17.09.2002 for premium paid. The insurance company issued the policy and the schedule of insurance in favour of Sh. Mahesh Chand Gupta and under the policy documents the beneficiary of the policy was Mrs. Maya Devi Gupta i.e. Mother of the insured. 2) On 19.05.2003 at about 11:30 pm unfortunately the complainants son Sh. Mahesh Chand Gupta who had obtained the policy from the OP insurance company was attacked by firearm by some unknown persons and subsequently the son of the complainant died at AIIMS Hospital, New Delhi. An FIR No. 148/2003 wa...
Tag this Judgment!The Vaish Co-operative New Bank Ltd. Vs. the Oriental Insurance Co. Lt ...
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
S.C. Jain, Member: 1) The present complaint has been filed by the complainant under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. The facts of the case are that the complainant filed the complaint on the averments that they had been taking Bankers Indemnity Policy from the opposite party since the year 1986 and the same renewed from time to time. During the period 11.07.2006 to 10.07.2007, the complainant bank took bankers indemnity insurance policy bearing No. 271600/48/2007/238 for a sum of Rs. 45 Lacs. The said policy was renewed thereafter also. It is further claimed that said bankers indemnity policy is governed by the terms and conditions as per the Standard Policy and Clause (d) of the Standard Policy is as under : œThe dishonest or criminal act of the employee (s) of the insured with respect to the loss of money and/or Securities wherever committed and whether committed singly or in connivance with other.? 2) During the period 1986 to 2006 the complainant never lodged a...
Tag this Judgment!Pramod Sharma and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan Through District Colle ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
1. This O.A., originally filed as DB Civil Writ Petition (PIL) numbered as W.P. No. 2662/2006 filed by one, Shri Pramod Sharma and 7 others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others in the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur with the prayer to direct closure of brick kiln activities in Bundi District and in areas adjacent to Bundi city in the State of Rajasthan. In pursuance to the order dated 23rd September, 2013 of Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan issued in consonance with the order dated 9th August, 2012 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Bhopal Gas Peedith Mahila Udyog O.A. No. 114 of 2013 Page 2 of 18 Sangathan and Others Vs. Union of India and Others (2012) 8 SCC 326, the above said writ petition was transferred to the Central Zone Bench, Bhopal of National Green Tribunal. Upon its transfer, the writ petition was registered as OA No. 114/2013 and notices were issued to all the parties vide order dated 5th December, 2013. Later on, the case was heard on 27th January, 2014,...
Tag this Judgment!M/S M-tech Developers Ltd. Vs. Swapna Bhattacharya
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.APP. 22/2014 M/S M-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raman Duggal, Advocate. versus SWAPNA BHATTACHARYA ..... Respondent Through: Dr. B.K. Dash and Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.CM No.6670/2014 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CO.APP. 22/2014 and CM No.6669/2014 (stay) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.01.2014 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No.54/2013 whereby the learned Company Judge directed the Registry of this Court to release the amount of ` 3,75,000/- deposited by the Appellant herein along with interest accrued, to the Respondent. In addition, the Appellant was directed to pay simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the receipt of the amount till the date of deposit. CO. APP. 22/2014 The Appellant ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Ishrat Begum and anr Vs. Shri Nadeem HussaIn and anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 670/2013 SMT ISHRAT BEGUM AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. S. D. Ansari and Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocates. versus SHRI NADEEM HUSSAIN AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. S. A. Khan, Advocate for R1. Mr. Jayendra, Advocate for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Cont.Cas(C) No.670/2013 1. The principal grievance of the petitioners in seeking initiation of contempt proceedings is with regard to the alleged violation of the directions issued by this Court 18.04.2013 in C.M.(Main) No.1174/2011, which are as follows; 11.2. The respondent shall not interfere in the peaceful enjoyment of the use and occupation of the suit property by the petitioners during the pendency of the suit. The aforesaid directions came to be issued by this Court after a factual analysis of the respective claims, which concluded with the finding that;8. The petitioners, thus continued to retain their possession...
Tag this Judgment!State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) Vs. Gurjinder Singh @ Barjinder Singh an ...
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t April, 2014 + CRL.L.P. 325/2013 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State versus GURJINDER SINGH @ BARJINDER SINGH & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 9840/2013 (delay) in CRL.L.P. 325/2013 Delay of 157 days in filing of the leave to appeal is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. The application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 325/2013 1. The present leave to appeal petition is directed against the judgment dated 27.08.2012 acquitting Gurjinder @ Barjinder Singh and Birju Dass for offences punishable under Section 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) in prosecution arising out of FIR No.156/2009, Police Station Mukherjee Nagar.2. Gurjinder @ Barjinder Singh is a former police officer in Delhi Police and Birju Dass is a chhole w...
Tag this Judgment!