Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 18 of about 432 results (0.022 seconds)Vijay Power Generators Ltd Vs. Annai Engineering Works and anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 04.2014 + CRL. A.1437 of 2013 & CRL. A.1447 of 2013 VIJAY POWER GENERATORS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.K. Pandey, Adv. versus ANNAI ENGINEERING WORKS & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Jain & Ms. Manisha Chauhan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) These appeals are directed against two separate orders dated 14.5.2013, of the Metropolitan Magistrate whereby two complaints filed by the appellant against the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, were dismissed on merits. The case of the complainant/appellant in nutshell is that it is a limited Company engaged in the business of sale and purchase of diesel generator sets, alternators, etc. and the respondent, who is carrying on business under the name and style of Annai Engineering Works purchased some goods from it against bills. The respondent issued four (4) cheques three (3) cheques dated 6....
Tag this Judgment!israel @ Ajay Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 1254/2013 ISRAEL @ AJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI + Through: CRL.A. 1149/2013 OM SHIV @ KALLU ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Adv. versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CRL.A. 1151/2013 ZAKIR @ NASIR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Habibur Rahman, Adv. versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 12.07.2008, on receipt of information regarding firing at Mahila Mandal, SI Hukum Singh reached Shop No.E-I/1, Madangir, New Delhi, where a crowd was found having gathered. On enquiry, it came to be known that some persons, who had come on two motorcycles, had shot Pawan Kumar and Naresh Kumar, who had been taken to Batra Hospital in injured co...
Tag this Judgment!Randhir Singh Vs. Gaon Sabha Maidangarhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:21. 03.2014 Date of Decision:22. 04.2014 Rev. Pet. 282/2013 & CM No.8388/2012 in LPA6462012 RANDHIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Adv. versus GAON SABHA MAIDANGARHI Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN ..... Respondent JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The facts, as noted in the order dated 20.02.2013 are as follows: The appellant before us is in possession of agricultural land measuring two bighas comprised in khasra No.103 in Revenue Estate of village Maidan Garhi, Delhi. An inspection was carried out by the Village Patwari on 4th February, 2000 and it was found that there existed house, plants of fruits and vegetables and tin shed for fodder cattle on the aforesaid land along with a tubewell. The proceedings under Sec. 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act having been initiated against the appellant, he appeared before the concerned Sub-Divisional Ma...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Gesture Hotels and Foods Pvt. Ltd Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved on:06. th March, 2014 Order Pronounced on:22. n d April, 2014 CS(OS) 1914/2012 M/S GESTURE H OTE LS AND FOODS P V T. L TD Through: ...... P LA IN TIFF Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sangwan and Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Advocates versus N EW D ELH I M UNIC IPA L C OUNCIL Through: .......D EFENDAN T Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rachna Golcha, Ms. Monisha Handa and Mr. Arvind Sah, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.IA No.11822/2012 (under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC) 1. On 6.3.2014, arguments on the above application under Order 39 rule 1 and 2 were heard and order was reserved. However, on account of a typographic al error, in the order sheet, IA No.was show n as 11823/2013.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for specific performance and permanent injunction in respect of premises allotted to the plaintiff at Akbar Bhawan Annexe, Chanakya Puri, New Delhi. The case ...
Tag this Judgment!Akbar Ali Vs. State (Govt. of Nct, Delhi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d April, 2014. + CS(OS) 1306/2005 AKBAR ALI Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Rajesh Kumar proxy counsel along with plaintiff in person. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI) AND ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Dhamesh Relan, Adv. for D-1 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has on 10th May, 2005 sued the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), the Commissioner of Police, the S.H.O. Police Station-Jahangirpuri, Sub Inspector, Jaipal Singh and one Mr. Niranjan Singh, for damages and compensation in the sum of Rs.22 lakhs along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realization, pleading: (i) that the plaintiff has been carrying on proprietorship firms namely M/s. Star Steel Polishing and Buffing Works and M/s. Akbar Polishing Works and is an income tax assessee; (ii) that the plaintiff, in the month of January, 2002, was repairing and constructing his house No.J-1746-47 Jaha...
Tag this Judgment!Puneet Sikand and Another Vs. Gnctd and anr
Court: Delhi
#6 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8274/2010 & CM APPL. 21289/2010 PUNEET SIKAND & ANOTHER ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Abhimanyu Mahajan with Mr. Milan Deep Singh, Advocates versus GNCTD & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Ajay Arora, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Sri Satyakam, Advocate for R-3. Date of Decision :22. d April, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:(i) To issue a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondents, its agents, employees or servants from demolishing the toe wall and green areas in front of flat No.B-142, Mount Kailash, DDA (SFS) Colony, New Delhi pursuant to order dt. 21-10-10; (ii) To restrain the respondents from uprooting the existing plants as planted in green area as per the development plan; (iii) to award cost of the present petition in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent; and (iv) to pass any other or furt...
Tag this Judgment!Om Shiv @ Kallu Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 04.2014 + CRL.A. 1254/2013 ISRAEL @ AJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI + Through: CRL.A. 1149/2013 OM SHIV @ KALLU ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Adv. versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CRL.A. 1151/2013 ZAKIR @ NASIR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Habibur Rahman, Adv. versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) On 12.07.2008, on receipt of information regarding firing at Mahila Mandal, SI Hukum Singh reached Shop No.E-I/1, Madangir, New Delhi, where a crowd was found having gathered. On enquiry, it came to be known that some persons, who had come on two motorcycles, had shot Pawan Kumar and Naresh Kumar, who had been taken to Batra Hospital in injured co...
Tag this Judgment!inram Solar Private Limited and ors. Vs. Ministry for New and Renewabl ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 04.2014 LPA4202013 INRAM SOLAR PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ..... Appellants versus MINISTRY FOR NEW AND RENEWABLE ENGERY & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants : Mr Garud M.V. For the Respondents : Ms Karuna Chhatwal with Mr Joginder Sukhija for respondent No.1 Mr Sanjay Bhatt with Mr Abhishek Anand for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL , J1 The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 15.05.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No.3177/2013. The writ petition being WP(C) No.3177/2013 was filed by the appellants, challenging the order passed by the respondents rejecting the representation of the appellants to be considered for the Rooftop PV & Small Solar Power Generation Programme, launched by the respondents.2. Brief facts necessary for the present adj...
Tag this Judgment!Ca Nandlal Kedia Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CMI No.3/2013 22nd April, 2014 % CA NANDLAL KEDIA Through: ....Appellant Mr. Ajay Raghav, Advocate. VERSUS LT. GOVERNOR AND ORS. Through: ...... Respondents None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Not only the suit was wholly frivolous but this appeal is also wholly frivolous. The appeal is argued on behalf of the appellant by a counsel who is appointed by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee. The subject suit was filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking application of Section 145 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978. The appellant/plaintiff claims that the Local Commissioner appointed by a civil court in Bhiwani, Haryana alongwith the police wrongly broke upon the locks of his office.2. The admitted facts however are that the appellant was in litigation with his brother in the courts at Bhiwani in a partition suit and in that suit after passing of the preliminary ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt.Vandana Sharma Vs. Smt.Hemlata Goswamy and anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. No.16744/2011 in CS (OS) 1544/2011 Reserved on:21. t November, 2013 Decided on:22. d April, 2014 % SMT.VANDANA SHARMA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun Sharma and Mr. Avnish Pandey, Advocates. versus SMT.HEMLATA GOSWAMY & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate for Defendant No.1 with Defendant No.1 in person. Mr. S.N. Sharma, Advocate for Defendant No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA I.A. No.16744/2011(u/Order VII Rule 11 CPC by Defendant No.1) 1. By this application the Defendant No.1 seeks rejection of the plaint filed by the Plaintiff, the daughter of Defendant No.1.2. Learned counsel for the Defendant No.1/applicant contends that the present suit, filed by the Plaintiff is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed in view of Order VII Rule 11 (a), (b) and (d) CPC inter alia being barred by limitation, as no cause of action has accrued in favour of the Plaintiff ...
Tag this Judgment!