Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 26 of about 432 results (0.023 seconds)Kalsang Choemphel and ors. Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 652/2009 KALSANG CHOEMPHEL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Bimlesh Kumar, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Advocate for respondent No.1 with Mr Vedpal, Assistant Divisional Officer, Delhi Fire Service. Reserved on :18. h March, 2014 Date of Decision :16. h April, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayers:"(I) writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s) order(s) direction(s) for commanding the respondent authorities for providing relaxation in to the installation of two out of twelve Fire Safety Parameters of the Delhi Fire Service, on account of impossibility of performance/installation thereof at the Dharamsalas run by petitioner mentioned above by taking into account the special socio-economic religious and morphological condition and circumstances as ...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Kumar Vs. Border Security Force and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : April 01, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : April 16, 2014 + W.P. (C) No.5440/2002 SURESH KUMAR Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate versus BORDER SECURITY FORCE & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Mr.Pradeep Desodya and Mr.Arvind Sharma for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The factual backdrop leading to the filing of the above captioned petition is that on August 11, 1988 the petitioner was enrolled as a Constable in Border Security Force.2. The petitioner availed earned leave due to him in the year 1989 and reported back in time. Thereafter, on several occasions the petitioner overstayed leave or proceeded on unauthorized leave. Put in a tabular form, the data would reveal as follows:Sl. No.1. Period of overstay/ Duration of overstay/ unauthorized leave unauthorized leave February 23, 1990 to March 01,...
Tag this Judgment!Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:11. 03.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:16. 04.2014 + CUSAA32014 & C.M. No.829/2014 .APPELLANT SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. Through : Mr. Tarun Gulati, Mr. Rony. O. John & Mr. Shashi Mathews, Advocates. Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Satish Kumar, Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT1 This is an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against the order dated 19.06.2013 of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissing the appellant companys appeal challenging the denial of refund claim under Notification No.102/2007-Cus read with Section 27 of Customs Act. The question of law that arises for determination in this appeal is Can period of limitation for preferring refund claims, specified in the amending notification No.CUSAA32014 Page 1 93/2008-Cus be made applicable with retrospective effect, ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Ii Vs. M/S Ankit Garments Manufactur ...
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:16. 04.2014 + ITA5112013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE II ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Judy James, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S ANKIT GARMENTS MANUFACTURING CO. .... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. Service is complete upon the respondent/assessee. However, there is no appearance on its behalf. Appeal is admitted. The following question of law arises for consideration:Did the Tribunal fall into error in setting aside the Commissioners order made in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act in the given circumstances of the case?.2. A search and seizure operation was conducted on 16.10.2007 in the establishment of one Shri Dwarka Das Aggarwal (TNG Group). ITA5112013 Page 1 Notice under Section 142 (1) was issued to the asses...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ritu Kapoor and ors
Court: Delhi
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. h April, 2014 % + MAC.APP.No.597/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate. Versus RITU KAPOOR & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal is directed against the award dated 05.03.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation as under:a) b) c) d) Medial bills and expenses-------------------------Rs.9047/Special diet and conveyance charges -------------- Rs.21,228/Pain and sufferings, inconvenience -------------Rs.50,000/and temporary loss of amenities etc. Loss of income------------------------------------Rs.38,688/__________________ Total MAC.APP.597/2012 Interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum was also awarded by the learned Tribunal from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount. Besides, this, a su...
Tag this Judgment!Hafizur Rehman @ Nadeem Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~R-68 & 69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on :16.4.2014 CRL.A. No.208/2006 HAFIZUR REHMAN @ NADEEM Through ..... Appellant Appellant with his counsel Mr. Mohit Popli, Adv. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through + Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP CRL.A. No.308/2007 NADEEM ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jiwan Pal Singh, Adv. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J (oral) 1 There are two appellants before this Court namely Hafizur Rehman and Nadeem. They have been convicted by the Sessions Judge under Sections 392/394 read with Section 34 of the IPC and each of them had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 5 years for the offence punishable under Section 392/34 of the IPC besides a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for a period of 6 months; for the offence under Section 394/34 of the IPC, each of the two convicts had been sentenced to undergo RI ...
Tag this Judgment!Omesh Mishra Memorial Charitable Trust Vs. Sriram Housing Finance and ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Pronounced on: April 16, 2014 CM(M) No.493/2012 & C.M. No.7470/2012 OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST .... Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjiv Bansal, Adv. versus SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE & INVESTMENT INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Naresh Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the abovementioned petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in order to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court against the order dated 13th January, 2012 passed in Execution No.46/06, titled as Sh.N.D.Mishra vs. Ms.Nisha Chauhan, whereby the Executing Court while entertaining the objections filed under Order 21 Rules 97 to 101 CPC framed the issues and issued the directions to the parties to lead their evidence on those issues.2. The submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/decree holder is...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. M/S Devasan Investment Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:21. 03.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:16. 04.2014 ITAs 1102/2011 & 1103/2011 + ITA11022011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV .APPELLANT Through : Mr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate. Versus M/S DEVASAN INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ajay Vohra with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. + ITA11032011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV .APPELLANT Through : Mr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate. Versus M/S DEVASAN INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ajay Vohra with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR ITAs 1102/2011 & 1103/2011 Page 1 MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT1 In these appeals, the Revenue contends that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in concluding that the amounts originally brought to tax as business income of the assessee were short and long term capital gains as claimed in the returns filed. The following common question of law ...
Tag this Judgment!Ntpc Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-v
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:13. 03.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:16. 04.2014 + ITA5072013 NTPC LTD. ..APPELLANT Through : Mr. S.E. Dastur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Muralidhar and Mr. Ved Jain, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V .RESPONDENT Through : Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Anshumaan Sahni & Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT1 This is an assessees appeal against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 30.4.2012 in ITA1438Del/2009 for the assessment year 2005-06. The question of law which arises for consideration in this case is whether the Commissioner of Income Tax fell into error in invoking his power under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) modifying the assessment order by withdrawing the additional ITA5072013 Page 1 depreciation of Rs.187,55,77,000 and further directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to exa...
Tag this Judgment!Shiv Kumar Giri Vs. the Management of M/S. Hotel Siddhartha Continenta
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on January 29, 2014 Judgment Delivered on April 16, 2014 + W.P.(C) 4764/1995 SHIV KUMAR GIRI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal with Ms. Aarushi Aggarwal, Advocates versus THE MANAGEMENT CONTINENTAL & ANR. Represented by: OF M/S. HOTEL SIDDHARTHA ..... Respondents Ms. Raavi Birbal with Mr. Nishant Anand, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated April 07, 1995 passed by the Labour Court in I.D. No.198/87 whereby the Labour Court has answered the reference made by the appropriate Government by holding that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.2. Suffice would it be to state that the Industrial Dispute was referred by the appropriate Government vide order dated April 21, 1987 in the following terms:Whether the termination of services of Sh. Shiv Kumar Giri is illegal and/or unjustified and if so, to what relief is he ...
Tag this Judgment!