Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. M/S Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 04.2014 FAO(OS) 9/2014 & CM3172014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus M/S ATMA RAM PROPERTIES (P) LTD Petitioner Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr J.S. Bhasin with Ms Rashmi Priya : Mr Amit Sethi CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.10.2013 passed by the learned single Judge of this court in CS(OS) 574/2010. Issues had been framed in the said suit and issue No.4 was as under:4. Whether the present suit is barred under the Delhi Rent Control Act?. (OPD)2. The said issue was initially sought to be treated as a preliminary issue.3. In the said suit, the respondent/plaintiff had sought three prayers. Prayer (a) was for a decree of possession in respect of the suit premises which incidentally is a property in Connaught Place comprising of an are...
Fountainhead Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Police and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C)2464/2014 FOUNTAINHEAD ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Amit Shukla, Advocate. Versus DELHI POLICE & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Shri B.S. Jaiswal, DCP (South District), Shri Deepak Gauri, ACP and Shri Satender Mohan Sharma, SHO, PS Lodhi Colony. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER % 19.04.2014 1. The present petition is assigned to this Court by Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice on the ground that the event, i.e., IRI (Idea Rocks India), is scheduled to be held tomorrow, i.e., on 20th April, 2014 at 6.30 PM at the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner applied to the respondents on 04.04.2014 for grant of Casual Performance License to hold the Idea Rocks India Concert -Performance by Mika on 20th April, 2014 from 6.00 pm to 10.00 pm at the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.3. The petitioner's applicat...
State Vs. Bharat Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DEATH SENTENCE REF. No.1 of 2013 STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate. versus BHARAT SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.509 of 2013 BHARAT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.1. By the judgment dated 14th January 2014 in SC14of 2013, the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Special Fast Tract Court convicted Bharat Singh for the offence under Sections 376 (2) (f) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) while acquitting co-accused Sanjay and Arvind for the offence under Section 201 IPC. By the consequent order on sentence dated 15th January 2013, the learned ASJ sentenced the accused Bharat Singh to rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 50,000 for the offence under Section 376...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Vikram @ Sanjay and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. h April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.966/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Amit Gaur, Advocate. Versus VIKRAM @ SANJAY & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. No.966/2011 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 03.08.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation as under:Medical Bills : Pain & Sufferings : Special Diet : Conveyance : Attendants Charges : Loss of Income : Loss of Income on account of disability : Loss of Amenities/enjoyment of life: Total : MAC. Appeal No.966 /2011 Rs. 2,788/Rs.50,000/Rs.15,000/Rs.15,000/Rs.25,000/Rs.36,000/Rs.4,86,000/Rs.75,000/Rs. 7,04,788/- Page 1 of 4 Interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount was also awarded by the learned Tribu...
Parvesh and ors. Vs. Dharmender and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. h April, 2014 % + MAC.APP.No.2/2013 PARVESH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Ms.Alka Srivastava, Advocate. Versus DHARMENDER & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal is directed against the award dated 01.11.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.13,02,400/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation, as noted above.3. Ms.Alka Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that accident had taken place on 13.05.2005 and the deceased died on 12.01.2008 while taking treatment from the hospital.4. She further submits that the learned Tribunal has...
Manglu Ghosh and anr. Vs. Union of India Gm Northern Railway
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO5382011 % 17th April, 2014 MANGLU GHOSH & ANR. ......Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA GM NORTHERN RAILWAY Through: ...... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 impugning the judgment of the Tribunal dated 29.7.2011 by which the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants/parents of the deceased Prashanta Ghosh was dismissed.2. The facts of the case are that the deceased Prashanta Ghosh, a resident of West Bengal was travelling from Malda Town to Delhi on 26.6.2007 after purchasing a railway journey ticket bearing no.20992056. Deceased Prashanta Ghosh boarded the train No.3483 Up Farakha Express from Malda Town to Delhi on 26.6.2007. When the train reached near Dabar Railway Station, and which is near Bulandshehar; UP, at about 12.45 at n...
State Vs. Jeewan Kumar Paswan and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h April, 2014 + CRL.L.P. 352/2012 STATE ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with SI Vivek Yadav, PS S.J.Enclave. versus JEEWAN KUMAR PASWAN & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. G.P. Singh, Advocate for Jeewan Kumar Paswan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Crl.M.A. 12502/2012 Delay in filing of the leave to appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 352/2012 Appellant-State has not been able to verify and positively ascertain whether respondent No.2 has expired. It is, however, stated that as per the information available and ascertained, respondent No.2 was a vagabond and resident of Nepal but no one knows his address in the said country. Orally it was stated that respondent No.2 has expired.2. We have heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. G.P. Singh, Advocate, who has entered appearance on behalf of respondent ...
Shivali Shiksha Sansthan Society and anr. Vs. the Administrator, Nct o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 12.2013 Pronounced on:17. 04.2014 + LPA5112003, C.M. APPL. 1150/2003, 1151/2003, 9082/2010, 4957/2013, 4958/2013 & CRL.M.A.6269/2010 SHIVALI SHIKSHA SANSTHAN SOCIETY & ANR. ..Appellants Through: Sh. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Vikas Tiwari and Sh. Azhar Alam, Advocates with appellant in person. Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, NCT OF DELHI AND ORS..Respondents Through: Sh. Rajiv Bansal, Ms. D. Ray Chaudhury and Ms. Swati Verma, Advocates, for DDA. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat wih Ms. Latika Choudhary, Advocates, for Director of Education. Sh. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Prakash Gautam, Sh. Vivek Ojha and Ms. Jayati Dutta, Advocates, for Resp. No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant (hereafter referred to as the Society) impugns the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge, dismissing its petition [W.P. (C) 6413/2001]. as well as the ord...
Sh. Atul Singh Gandas and Another Vs. Lt. Governor of Gnctd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
#5 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3386/2011 & CM APPL. 7072/2011 SH. ATUL SINGH GANDAS & ANOTHER ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Rajesh Yadav with Ms. Ruchira, Advocates versus LT. GOVERNOR OF GNCTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for R-1 and 2. Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for R-3. Ms. Saroj Bidawat Bansal, Advocate for R-4. Mr. A.K. Sen with Mr. Shyam Dutt, Advocates for R-6, 7 and 8. % Date of Decision :17. h April, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed primarily praying for quashing of provisional certificate of regularisation bearing No.F.1-33/UC/ UD/2004/PT-III dated 17th September, 2008 issued by the order and in the name of Lt. Governor of National Capital Territory of Delhi granting provisional regularisation to Pratap Gandas Colony-I & II, Village Kishangarh, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 070 having Registration No.965.2. Mr. Rajesh Yadav, learned couns...
Shashi Shekhar @ Neeraj Vs. State Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1665/2013 SHASHI SHEKHAR @ NEERAJ ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chawla with Ms. Neha Kapoor, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Charu Dalal for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, St. Counsel. SI Neeraj Kumar, P.S. Vasant Kunj. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL % ORDER1704.2014 CRL.M.A. 5922/2014 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A.5921/2014 (for additional documents) By way of this application, petitioner wants to place on record Annexure A to C i.e., copy of the order dated 28.2.2014 passed in WP(Crl.) 404/2014, copy of the order dated 13.3.2014 passed in LPA No.230/2014 and copy of the order dated 9.4.2014 passed in SLP(Crl.) 3047-3048/2014. Learned counsel for respondent-State has not opposed the request. Accordingly, the aforesaid documents/orders are taken on record. Application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A.5905/2014 (For extension ...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »