Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Daulat Ram College Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on January 09, 2014 Judgment Delivered on April 21, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2448/1996 DAULAT RAM COLLEGE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.M.Kalra, Advocate with Mr. Kunal Kalra and Ms. Sushma Sachdeva, Advocates versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Manchanda, Advocate with Mr. Rajat Manchanda, Advocate for R1. Mr. M.M.Singh, Advocate with Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate for R2. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for UGC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Commissioner, in short) under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Act, 1952 (Act, in short) which was communicated to the petitionerCollege vide covering letter dated May 27, 1995, whereby the Commissioner was of the view that the petitioner-Colleg...
Haseen Miya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : March 28, 2014 DECIDED ON : April 21, 2014 + CRL.A. 1037/2011 HASEEN MIYA ..... Appellant Through : Mrs.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. SI Raj Pal Singh, PS Anand Vihar. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Haseen Miya impugns his conviction under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC recorded by a judgment dated 10.11.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge (East) in Sessions Case No.29/10 arising out of FIR No.560/09 registered at police station Anand Vihar. By an order dated 16.11.2010, the appellant was sentenced to 2. Allegations against the appellant, as set up in the charge- sheet, were that on 29.12.2009 at about 03.00 p.m. at Birla Land near Karkardooma Metro Station, he and his three associates (who faced proceedings before Juvenile Justice Board) in furtherance of common intention robbed Bhuvneshwar of `12,000/- and mobile phone at kn...
Sh. Lakhbir Singh Vs. Sh. Arun Kumar Khanna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t, April, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.1030/2009 SH. LAKHBIR SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. I.S. Alag, Adv. Versus SH. ARUN KUMAR KHANNA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar & Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The following issue, of the issues framed on 05.07.2011 in this suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property and for permanent injunction restraining the sole defendant from transferring, alienating or encumbering the property and in the alternative for compensation and, ordered to be treated as a preliminary issue, is for adjudication:Whether the suit is barred in view of Order 2 Rule 2 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure?. OPD2. Arguments were heard on 06.03.2014. However neither counsel cited the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Virgo Industries (Eng.) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Venturetech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 1 SCC625 Af...
Rakesh Kumar Chola Alias Rajesh Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 04.2014 Date of Decision:21. 04.2014 + CRL. A.224of 2010 SHANKAR AND ANR. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.C. Sagar and Mr Rajesh Rajora, Advs. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL. A.226of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR CHOLA ALIAS RAJESH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dinesh Chander Yadav, Mr. Mahinder Singh & Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.In the night intervening 30/31st October, 2004, Police Control Room received an information that a person namely Pradeep had been stabbed in Gali Akhade Wali, Sita Ram Bazar, Delhi and was being taken to JPN Hospital. The information, when conveyed to Police Station Hauz Qazi was recorded vide DD No.3A and a copy of the said DD was handed over to SI Mahmood Ali for investigation. SI Mahmood Ali reached JPN Hospital, where the injured Pradeep was found admitted....
Deepak Mehta and anr Vs. Yashi Multimedia Pvt Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t April, 2014 % + CS(OS) 869/2010 DEEPAK MEHTA & ANR Through: .... Plaintiffs Mr. S.K. Agarwal, Mr. Umesh Kumr & Mr. N.P. Rakesh Panikar, Advs. versus YASHI MULTIMEDIA PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.K. Gautam, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The two plaintiffs have instituted this suit on 27th March, 2010 for recovery of damages in the sums of US$ 8,69,387.67 equal to Rs.4,02,00,486/- with pendente lite and future interest jointly and severally from the five defendants.2. Summons of the suit were issued and a joint written statement has been filed by the defendants and to which a replication has been filed by the plaintiffs. The parties were referred to the Mediation Cell of this Court, which remained unsuccessful. The parties have filed affidavits of admission / denial of each others documents.3. The suit was listed on 28th March, 2...
Essar Projects (India) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gail (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: April 21, 2014 + ARB.P. No.424/2012 ESSAR PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Adv. versus GAIL (INDIA) LTD Through ..... Respondent Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Ranjana Gawai and Mr.Shailesh Suman, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order I propose to decide the present petition filed by the petitioners under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate all disputes between the parties in terms of Clause 59 of the Contract dated 24 th December, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the Contract). Petitioners Case 2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners Consortium (the Contractor) and respondent (the Employer) entered into the Contract for laying, testing and commissioning of Vijaipur-Dadri Pipeline Section and Associated Facilities (S...
Shankar and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 04.2014 Date of Decision:21. 04.2014 + CRL. A.224of 2010 SHANKAR AND ANR. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.C. Sagar and Mr Rajesh Rajora, Advs. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL. A.226of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR CHOLA ALIAS RAJESH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dinesh Chander Yadav, Mr. Mahinder Singh & Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.In the night intervening 30/31st October, 2004, Police Control Room received an information that a person namely Pradeep had been stabbed in Gali Akhade Wali, Sita Ram Bazar, Delhi and was being taken to JPN Hospital. The information, when conveyed to Police Station Hauz Qazi was recorded vide DD No.3A and a copy of the said DD was handed over to SI Mahmood Ali for investigation. SI Mahmood Ali reached JPN Hospital, where the injured Pradeep was found admitted....
Nagaland Industrial Raw Materials and Supply Corpora Vs. Union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: April 21, 2014 + I.A.No.16577/2011 in OMP No.769/2011 NAGALAND INDUSTRIAL RAW MATERIALS & SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr.P.K.Mittal, Adv. with Mr.Mohit Chadha, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through Mr.Saqib, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned objection petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, called the Act) against the Award dated 24th February, 2011 passed by the sole Arbitrator Mr.B.L. Chaudhary.2. Along with the petition, the petitioner has filed an application under Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 112 days in re-filing the petition after deduction of 30 days. The said application was dismissed by order dated 6th March, 2013. Consequently, the main petition under Section 34 of the Act was also dismissed. The said order was chall...
Neeraj Vs. the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1192/2012 Reserved on:21. t January, 2014 Decided on:21. t April, 2014 % NEERAJ Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.S. Gulia and Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Rich Pal Singh, PS Tilak Marg, New Delhi. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, the Appellant challenges the judgment dated 25th July, 2012 whereby he has been convicted for offence under Section 376 (1) IPC and the order on sentence dated 3rd August, 2012 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- and in default thereof to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one day.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that the conviction has been based on mis-appreciation of facts and law. As per the Doctor, the Appellant was incapable of sexual intercourse. Thus he could not have been convicted for off...
Reliance General Insurance Company Vs. Smt. Kusum and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. t April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.352/2014 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY.... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus SMT. KUSUM & ORS. Represented by: ....Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.CM No.6640/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. + MAC.APP. No.352/2014 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/Insurance Company challenging the impugned award dated 03.03.2014 on the sole ground that while awarding the compensation for loss of dependency, the learned Tribunal has adopted the multiplier of 18 keeping in mind the age of the deceased, i.e., 24 years, whereas as per the settled law, multiplier as per the age of the parents should have been applied.2. To strengthen her arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has relied upon the case of National In...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »