Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prem Singh Vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 276 of 2008 PREM SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Anand, Advocate. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE Through: None. ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 277 of 2008 RAJENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Anand, Advocate. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE Through: None. ..... Respondent And CRL.A. 278 of 2008 TARLOCHAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Anand, Advocate. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER2404.2014 1. These appeals are directed against the common order dated 30 th November 2007 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (AT) dismissing the Appeal Nos. 618 of 2005, 619 of 2005 and 620 of 2005 thereby confirming the adjudication order (AO) dated 13 th June 2005 passed by the Speci...
M/S Olam Agro India Ltd Vs. M/S Mother V Impex Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2014 CO. PET. 302/2012 & CA No.1209/2012 M/S OLAM AGRO INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner versus M/S MOTHER V IMPEX PVT LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Arun Kathpalia, Mr Rajat Jariwal, Mr Angad & Ms Anisha Somal. : Mr Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr Rishab Raj Jain. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner company under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) inter alia praying for winding up of the respondent company on the ground that the respondent company is unable to pay its debts. It is alleged that the respondent had failed and neglected to pay a sum of `8,45,89,296/- alongwith interest, which was claimed as due and payable by the respondent company on account of supply of goods by the petitioner to the respondent. The respondent...
Raj Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :23. d April, 2014 DECIDED ON :24. h April, 2014 + CRL.A. 1308/2011 & CRL.M.B.No.626/2014 RAJ KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Kansal, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Raj Kumar (the appellant) challenges the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 28.07.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I (East) in Sessions Case No.26/2011 arising out of FIR No.664/2007 registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri by which he was convicted under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC; 411 IPC; and 25 Arms Act. By an order dated 29.07.2011, he was awarded various prison terms.2. The prosecution case, as set up in the charge-sheet, was that on 25.09.2009 at around 09.30 pm near Telco T-Point, Gazipur, the appellant robbed complainant Shailender Rathore of his purse containing `500/-, RC of motor cycle No.DL-7SAH-2101 ...
Smt. Vimlesh Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
$-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :24. h APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A. 1168/2012 & CRL.M.A.No.17574/2012 SMT. VIMLESH ..... Appellant Through : Appellant is present in person. versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.M.S.Vinaik, Advocate with Ms.Surabhi Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Smt. Vimlesh (the appellant) has presented the appeal to challenge the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 16.08.2012 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Special Electricity Court, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Case No.122/09 PS Amar Colony, New Delhi, whereby she was convicted under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003. By an order dated 04.09.2012, she was sentenced to undergo RI for one and a half years. ` 7,89,306/- was imposed as fine. The civil liability was determined ` 5,26,204/-.2. The matter was referred for settlement to Lok Adalat. However, the dispute could not be resolved there. Admitte...
Chandan @ Babar Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :24. h APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A. 974/2011 CHANDAN @ BABAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Adit S.Pujari, Advocate for Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Chandan @ Babar impugns conviction in Sessions Case No.39/2008 arising out of FIR No.64/2008 registered at Police Station Bara Hindu Rao by which he was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Section 120-B/392/397 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet was that on 13.06.2008 at about 05.00 A.M. opposite shop No.T-736, Tyre Market, Azad Market, DCM Road in pursuance of criminal conspiracy, Chandan @ Babar and his associates - Mukesh @ Mukka, Karan Singh @ Deva and Mohd.Wasim robbed ` 2,500/-, visiting cards and mobile phone no.9212421161 ...
National Investor Forum Reg. Vs. Golden Forests India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided On:24. 04.2014 + W.P.(C) 1399/2010 & CM APPL. 7072/2012 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REG. ..... Petitioner Mr. Ranjan Mukerjee, Adv. for the applicant. Versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Harpawan Kumar Arora, Adv. for Committee-GFIL. Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Adv. for SEBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % CM APPL. 7072/2012 1. This application seeks appropriate directions from the Court, to the Court appointed Committee to carry out the affairs and manage the properties, and sell the assets of the Golden Forests (India) Ltd and its group companies.2. The brief background of the case is that the Golden Forests (India) Ltd (GFIL) was incorporated in 1987. Between the years 1991 and 1997, its promoters set up over 100 companies, including Golden Tourist Resorts and Developers Ltd (1991), Golden Lease Finance Ltd (1994) Golden Projects...
Meenu Upadhyay Vs. Kanwar Pal Singh and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 929/2013 % Judgment dated 24.04.2014 MEENU UPADHYAY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Prateek Kumar and Mr.Suryajyoti Singh Paul, Advs. versus KANWAR PAL SINGH & ANR Through: Mr.Vijay Chopra, Adv. for D-1. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) IA No.11516/2013 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery and damages for a sum of Rs.32,35,000/-.2. This is an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC filed by defendant No.1 seeking vacation of the interim order dated 17.05.2013 which was made absolute on 12.07.2013 by virtue of which defendant No.1 was restrained from creating any third party interest in respect of property bearing No.C-5/134, Area measuring 35 sq.m., Yamuna Vihar, Ilaqa Shahdara, Delhi-110053.3. Upon service, the defendants filed their written statements. It is submitted by counsel for defendant No.1 that on the next date of hearing, before the matter was taken up on its turn...
Ram Prabhu Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
$~R-41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :17.4.2014 Judgment delivered on :24.4.2014 CRL.A. No.272/2003 RAM PRABHU SHARMA Through ..... Appellant Appellant with his counsel Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 05.4.2003 and 17.4.2003 respectively wherein he has been convicted under Section 376 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 1 year. 2 Record shows that as per the version of the prosecutrix (PW-3) on 07.7.2001 at about 9.00 a.m. she was called by the appellant to his house at Quarter No.14/1 Vayusenabad on the pretext of getting her a job; he told that she has to spent Rs.10,000/-; she told him that she does not have the money; he stated that in lie...
Jaipal Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2014 W.P.(C) 71/2014 JAIPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rahul Sharma For the Respondents : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal for respondent No.1. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. On 06.01.2014 when this matter was taken up for hearing the following order was passed by us:This matter has a long history. Earlier two writ petitions had been filed by the petitioner. The earlier two petitions as well as the present petition pertain to the matter of payment of interest to the petitioner under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). It is not in dispute that the land in question was the subject matter of Award No.25/2005-06/DC (N-W) dated 06...
Union of India Vs. Birharamwati @ Birmati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO No.135/2012 24th April, 2014 UNION OF INDIA Through: ......Appellant Mr. A.S.Dateer, Adv. VERSUS BIRHARAMWATI @ BIRMATI Through: ...... Respondent Ms. Naveet Goyal, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM Nos. 5488/2012 (delay in filing) and 5489/2012 (delay in refiling) For the reasons stated in the applications, delay in filing and refiling is condoned. CMs stand disposed of. FAO1352012 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 by the Union of India/Railways impugning the judgment of the Tribunal dated 14.9.2011 by which the Tribunal accepted the claim petition which was filed by the respondent, who is the mother of the deceased Sarvesh. It is the case of the respondent/claimant that the deceased Sarvesh died in an untoward incident of a fall from the train on 28.7.2010 while travelling from Shahdara to Ghaziabad i...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »