Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahesh Chand Vs. Mgt. of M/S Le Meridien
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 16.05.2013 Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 5311/2000 and C.M. Appln. No. 19796/2012 (Arising out of I.D. No.725/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) MAHESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5312/2000 and C.M. No. 314/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.726/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) SRI NIWAS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5345/2000 and C.M. No. 318/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.727/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) RAMESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN & ANR ..... Respondents T...
Reinforced Earth India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Gurunanak Engineering Service ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: July 01, 2013 + ARB.P. No.382/2012 REINFORCED EARTH INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Gurinder Pal Singh, Adv. with Mr.Nitin Mangla, Adv. versus M/S GURUNANAK ENGINEERING SERVICES ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rohit Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office in New Delhi. The respondent, Gurunanak Engineering Services, is a company having its registered office in Haryana, which awarded the petitioner a contract for the construction of a Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall for ROB on the Delhi Mathura Railway line in Faridabad, Haryana.2. This construction work was supposed to be completed within a year from the date of the work order i.e. by 9th July, 2009. However, on 20th July, 2009, the petitioner had sought an extension, which was not replied to by the respondents. However, by the condu...
Chander Mohan Lall Vs. Dlf Commercial Developers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: May 05, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 01, 2013 + Arb. Appeal No.8/2013 CHANDER MOHAN LALL Through ..... Appellant Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Kanika Singh and Ms.Nancy Roy, Advs. versus DLF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.B.B. Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Present appeal has been filed against order dated 20th February, 2013 of learned Arbitrator passed on the application under Section 17 filed by the appellant.2. By the impugned order, the learned Arbitrator has directed the appellant for depositing the holding and maintenance charges from 12th January, 2011 till actual holding over the possession of the said premises by the respondent to the appellant and further directs to deposit the FDR drawn on a nationalized bank in the name of the respondent with this Tribunal of an amount equivalent of the arrears of holding and maintenance charges demand...
Trivender Singh Vs. Motia Wanti
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA 8/2009 % Date of Decision: July 1, 2013 TRIVENDER SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.V.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Priyank Sharma, Advocate versus MOTIA WANTI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sandeep Chandna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.* 1. A challenge by means of this regular second appeal is made to the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.10.2008 passed by the lower appellate court, by which the ld. Appellate Judge, Delhi has set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.2.2005 passed by ld. Civil Judge, Delhi in Suit No.182/1999 whereby the suit of respondent/plaintiff for possession was dismissed and has decreed the suit for possession and mesne profits.2. A suit for possession was filed by the respondent herein i.e., plaintiff No.2 and her husband Shri Bal Mukund i.e. plaintiff No.1 before the learned Civil Judge, Delhi against the appellant herein i.e., defendant before the learned Civil Judge whe...
Vale Australia Pty. Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on : July 01, 2013 + FAO(OS) 210/2012 VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Mr.Anirudh Das, Ms.Smarika Singh, Ms.B.S.Baby, Mr.Manu Krishnan, Advocates. versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.A.K.Ganguly, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Parmatma Singh, Ms.Reeta Chaudhary, Mr.A.K.Panda, Mr.Jagmohan Sharma, Mr.Mayank Jain, Mr.Madhur Jain, Mr.Sharat Kapoor, Mr.Ashish Goswami, Advocates. And + FAO(OS) 214/2012 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.A.K.Ganguly, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Parmatma Singh, Ms.Reeta Chaudhary, Mr.A.K.Panda, Mr.Jagmohan Sharma, Mr.Mayank Jain, Mr.Madhur Jain, Mr.Sharat Kapoor, Mr.Ashish Goswami, Advocates. versus VALE AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. Respondent Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Mr.Anirudh Das, Ms.Smarika Singh, Ms...
Ramesh Chand Vs. Mgt. of M/S Le Meridien
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 16.05.2013 Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 5311/2000 and C.M. Appln. No. 19796/2012 (Arising out of I.D. No.725/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) MAHESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5312/2000 and C.M. No. 314/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.726/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) SRI NIWAS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5345/2000 and C.M. No. 318/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.727/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) RAMESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN & ANR ..... Respondents T...
National Cooperative Consumer Federation of India Vs. Kidar Nath Babba ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: May 15, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 01, 2013 + Ex.P. No.40/2011 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE CONSUMER FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Decree Holder Through Ms.Anju Bhattacharya, Adv. with Ms.Shipalika Dalmia, Adv. versus KIDAR NATH BABBAR Through ..... Judgment Debtor Mr.Ashwani Sharma, Adv. for JD with JD in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition concerns the execution of an arbitral award, passed by the learned sole Arbitrator, Dr. Y. K. Aggarwal, adjudicating a dispute between the parties, related to the recovery of possession of the applicants premises (from the respondent in the present petition): No. B-19 (Basement, western portion measuring 11363 sq. ft.), Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi-110020. The arbitrator found in favour of the claimant, wherein, the respondent was inter alia directed to: a. Handover the possession of the vacant premises to the claima...
Sri Niwas Vs. Mgt. of M/S Le Meridien
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 16.05.2013 Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 5311/2000 and C.M. Appln. No. 19796/2012 (Arising out of I.D. No.725/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) MAHESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5312/2000 and C.M. No. 314/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.726/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) SRI NIWAS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5345/2000 and C.M. No. 318/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.727/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999) RAMESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus MGT.OF M/S.LE MERIDIEN & ANR ..... Respondents T...
Eaton Corporation and anr. Vs. Bch Electric Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: January 11, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 01, 2013 I.A. No.1204/2012 in CS(OS) No.156/2012 EATON CORPORATION & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Navneet Momi, Mr.Amit Kumar & Ms.Neha Gupta, Advs. versus BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED Through ..... Defendant Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.C.A.Brijesh, Ms.Maidini Phul, Ms.V.Mohini and Mr.P.Kalra, Advs. AND + I.A. No.4318/2012 in CS(OS) No.575/2012 BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.C.A.Brijesh, Ms.Maidini Phul, Ms.V.Mohini and Mr.P.Kalra, Advs. versus EATON CORPORATION & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Navneet Momi, Mr.Amit Kumar & Ms.Neha Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of two applications under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 & 2, read with Section 151 CPC; first being I.A.No.1204/2012 filed by the plainti...
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. Vs. Ircon International Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 24, 2013 Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2013 Arb.P.No.31/2013 HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Dherainder Negi, Adv. with Ms.Smita Bhargava, Adv. versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Arun Khosla, Adv. with Ms.Shreeanka Kakkar, Adv. + Arb.P.No.32/2013 HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Dherainder Negi, Adv. with Ms.Smita Bhargava, Adv. versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Arun Khosla, Adv. with Ms.Shreeanka Kakkar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this common order, I propose to decide the two abovementioned petitions filed by the petitioner, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for appointment of an independent person as sole Arbitrator for resolving the disputes and differences which have arisen between the par...