Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madhusudan Auto Limited and anr Vs. ......
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d July, 2013 + CO. APPL. (M) NO. 81 OF 201.MADHUSUDAN AUTO LIMITED & ANR ........Applicants Through: Mr. Ashok Sharma and Mr. Praveen Kumar Mittal, Advocates for the Applicants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR R. V. EASWAR, J.: (ORAL) 1. This first motion joint application has been filed under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement (Scheme) of Madhusudan Auto Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) and Strong Vintrade Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) [hereinafter collectively referred to as Applicant Companies]. A copy of the proposed Scheme is enclosed with the application as Annexure- VII.2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the jurisdiction of this Court.3. The details of the dates of incorporation of the Applicant Co...
Sub Divisional Officer, Phones Vs. Babu Lal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on : July 3, 2013 W.P.(C) 3305/2005 SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PHONES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Prakash Pandey with Mr.Raghav Pandey, Advocates versus BABU LAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal with Mr.Sachin CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. By way of this writ petition challenge has been made to impugned award dated 21.06.2004 in I.D. No.103/1998 passed by Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal by which the respondent Nos.1 to 6/workmen have been given reinstatement with effect from 01.06.1988 with 20% back wages.2. The factual background is as under:The respondents had worked as casual labourers under the petitioner/management till 31st May, 1988. As per respondents, they had continuously worked for 3 years i.e. 1985, 1986 and 1987 for at least 242 days in each year. After their termination they had rai...
Parmanand Vs. C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No. 132/2004 Reserved on:22. d April, 2013 Decided on:03. d July, 2013 % PARMANAND Through: ..... Appellant Mr. D.K. Singh and Mr. Divyang Thakur, Advocate. versus C.B.I. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel for the CBI with Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The Appellant challenges the judgment dated 30th January, 2004 convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 31st January, 2004 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 7 of the PC Act and Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- for offence under Section 13 (2) of the PC Act.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that as per the Complainant PW7 Mu...
S.N. Malik Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8436/2011 S.N. MALIK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. % Date of Decision : July 03, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present petition filed by the Petitioner seeks to assail the action of the Respondent/DDA in cancelling the allotment of Flat No. 24-A, Pkt. A, Nand Nagri, Delhi made in favour of the Petitioner in the draw held on 18th February, 1991. The Petitioner also seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent/DDA to restore/re-allot the aforesaid flat to the Petitioner or in the alternative any other flat in the same locality at the old rates, that is, at the same cost as mentioned in the original allotment letter.2. The facts as culled out from the writ petition are that the Petitioner applied for allotment of flat in the year 1979 under the New Pattern Scheme in t...
Naresh Kumar Matta Vs. Dda and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
#7 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7266/2011 NARESH KUMAR MATTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Alok Kumar with Mr. Manisha Agarwal with Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocates versus DDA AND ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-1. Date of Decision:03. d July, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any order or any appropriate direction commanding the Respondent authorities i.e. Respondent No. 1 & 2 to withdraw the letter dated 17.05.2010 demanding a sum of Rs. 10,59,243/- for conversation of LIG Flat No. 61-E, DB, Block, Hari Nagar, New Delhi and; b) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any order or any appropriate direction directing the Respondent to consider and allow the application for conversation of flat No. 61-E, DB Block, Hari Nagar, New Delh064. ; c) ...
Pitam Singh Vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi Through Chief Secretary, ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
1. The applicant of this OA was a work-charged regular employee of the respondents posted at ISBT, Kashmere Gate, Delhi as a Pump Operator-II. 2. He fell ill and his illness was detected as cancer by the St. Stephens Hospital, after which he was referred to the Dharamshila Hospital, and a long treatment was given to him at the Dharamshila Cancer Hospital and Research Centre. With God's grace, he recovered from the said illness. He then submitted his medical bills totalling to Rs.4,98,164/- to the respondent-authority. The respondent authority, in turn, cleared 80% of those medical bills, by passing the bills in respect of Rs.3,99,744/-, through their orders dated 13.11.2007, 06.12.2007, 28.12.2007, 11.01.2008, 22.01.2008, 11.02.2008 and 07.05.2008. However, being dissatisfied with the balance amount of Rs.98,420/- having remained unpaid or un-reimbursed, the applicant earlier came before this Tribunal in OA 67/2011, which was disposed of on 10.01.2011 with the following orders: 2. In v...
State Vs. Sanjay Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 314/2013 and Crl.M.A. 9680/2013 Decided on 03.07.2013 IN THE MATTER OF : STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Addl. PP for State versus SANJAY GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present Criminal Leave Petition has been filed by the State under Section 378(3) read with Section 482 of the Cr.PC against the judgment dated 16.11.2012 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts in FIR No.367/2001 lodged under Sections 279/304A IPC at Police Station: Civil Lines, whereunder, the respondent has been acquitted by the court below.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 16.12.2001, on receiving DD No.49B regarding an accident, PW-9, Ct. Chandrapal and PW-12, SI Saket Kumar had reached the place of the incident, i.e., Boulevard Road, near Barakhana Chowk, opposite Ashok Market, Delhi, where the body of an unknown male, aged 30-35 ye...
State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Bishan Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 429/2012 Date of Decision:03. 07.2013 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Addl. Standing Counsel versus BISHAN SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. The present Criminal Leave to Appeal has been preferred by the petitioner/State under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C. to challenge the judgment dated 17.12.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, New and South East District, Patiala House Courts, Delhi thereby acquitting the accused persons of the charges framed against them under Sections 498A/302/34 IPC.2. The facts and circumstances which gave rise to the registration of the case against the accused persons as per prosecution are that on 23 rd August, 2002, an information vide DD No.29 was recorded in PP Madangir at about 11.05 p.m. that the in-laws had burnt their daughter-in-law t...
Mohd Zulfikar Ali Vs. M/S (Wakf) Hamdard Laboratories Thr Its Head Hr, ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.431/2013 Date of decision:3. d July, 2013 % ..... Appellant MOHD ZULFIKAR ALI Through Mr.B.K. Pal, Advocate versus M/S (WAKF) HAMDARD LABORATORIES THR ITS HEAD HR, P & A HAMDARD BUILDING .... Respondent Through Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (ORAL) LPA No.431/2013 1. By a separate order passed today, we have dismissed the appeal and directed that we would separately record reasons for doing so. We, hereby, record reasons for which we have not found merit in the appeal.2. The petitioner assails the order dated 21st March, 2013 passed in WP (C) No.1880/2013 whereby the writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. The petitioner had assailed an Industrial Award dated 28th March, 2012 by way of the said writ petition.3. The challenge by the petitioner rests on his contention that he was appointed as Kushtasaz (medicine maker) on the 5th March, 1996 by the responden...
B.N.Sanawan Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
$~4 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4332/2012 Date of decision :3. d July, 2013 % B.N.SANAWAN Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Rekha Palli, Adv. with Ms.Punam Singh, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. The petitioner in the instant case prays for issuance of a writ of Certiorari quashing the orders dated 10th February, 2012, 20th December, 2011 and the order dated 22nd January, 2008 passed by the respondent No.2 rejecting the petitioners representation in respect of certain adverse remarks which had been recorded in his Annual Confidential Report for the period w.e.f. 4th June, 2005 to 31st March, 2006. The petitioner has also prayed for issuance of writ of Mandamus seeking a direction to the respondents to hold a Review DPC for considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the rank of Second-in-Command w.e.f. 12th May, 2011...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »