Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Master Anant Narayan Rai and anr Vs. Siddarth Rai
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:03. d July, 2013 FAO(OS) 621/2012 and CM APPL. 21415/2012, CM APPL.21416/2012, CM APPL. 21418/2012 MASTER ANANT NARAYAN RAI AND ANR .....Appellant Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Natash Sehrawat, Advocate. versus SIDDARTH RAI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H.C. Kharbanda and Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The present appeal challenges the order dated 29.8.2012, by which the application for enhancement of maintenance in view of the applicantplaintiff having joined Scindia School, Gwalior was rejected.2. The brief facts are that the appellant-plaintiff is the son of the first respondent. The parents of the plaintiff have a matrimonial discord and several litigations are pending before this Court as well as before the Court of competent jurisdiction at Mau, Utta...
K.K.S.Sirohi and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: July 03, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3510/2013 K.K.S. SIROHI AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.L.R Khatana, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. O.A No.2917/2012 and O.A No.3320/2012 filed by the writ petitioners pertaining to disciplinary action initiated against them have been disposed of by the Central Administrative Tribunal vide impugned order dated March 19, 2013, directing the respondents to complete the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioners within three months.2. Brief facts necessary to understand the issue raised in this writ petition are that in the year 2007 common proceedings under Rule 14 read with Rule 18 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 were initiated against 4 persons including the petitioners ...
M/S Ramesh Kumar Ravinder Kumar Vs. Assistant Commissioner (East)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:03. 07.2013 W.P.(C) No.4126/2013 M/S RAMESH KUMAR RAVINDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.Yogesh Kumar , Advocate versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (EAST) ..... Respondent Through:Ms.Norrpa for counsel for Ms.Sujata Kashyap, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) CM No.9691/2013(Exemption) Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. WP(C) No.4126/2013 & CM No.9690/2013(stay) The petitioner before this Court was granted license for running a Fair Price Shop No.4757 in Circle No.05(now Circle No.59) by the respondent/Department of Food and Supplies, Govt. of NCT of Delhi. The business premises of the petitioner were inspected by the officials of the Department on 11 th May, 2013 and a number of discrepancies were found. A Notice dated 17th May, 2013 was then issued to the petitioner referring to the said inspection and a physical verification of the stock...
U.i.Carriers Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
14 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4106/2013 U.I.CARRIERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Advocate with Mr. Chetan Rai Wahi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocate with Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocate. Date of Decision:03. d July, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): C.M. Appl.9668/2013 (for exemption) in W.P. (C) 4106/2013 Keeping in view the averments in the application, same is allowed subject to just exceptions. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) 4106/2013 & C.M. Appl.9667/2013 1. Present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking setting aside of the order dated 21st June, 2013 passed by the respondent. The order dated 21st June, 2013 is reproduced hereinbelow:- Northern Railway DRMs Office, New Delhi No. CIID/SLR/TN/13112/2011 Date : /06/2013 (Amended) (Speed-Post) M/s. U.I. Carriers, IX/110...
Ram Awtar Manda and ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:03.07.2013 W.P.(C) 4010/2013 & CM 9470/2013 (stay) RAM AWTAR MANDA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.C. Chandra, Mr. Ashish Kumar and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Rakesh Gosain with Mr. Vineet Ajmani, Advs. For UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) Section 3 of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 provides for 27% reservation of seats in admission to the Central Educational Institutions. It also provides for 15% reservation in such institutions for Scheduled Caste and 7.5% for the Scheduled Tribes. The Central Educational Institutions has been defined in Section 2(d) of the Act, as under: Central Educational Institution" means(i) a university established or incorporated by or under a Central Act; (ii) an institution of national importance set up by an Act of Parliament;...
State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Jaidev Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
$-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :3. d JULY, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 241/2013 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. versus JAIDEV PRASAD ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. State has preferred Criminal Leave Petition under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C. to file appeal against judgment / order dated 08.07.2011 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate by which the complaint case filed under Section 22A of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was dismissed for nonprosecution. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the record. Trial Court record reveals that complaint case under Section 22A of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was filed by complainant/ Inspector- Joginder Singh against the respondent on 18.12.2009. Vide order dated 22.12.2009, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate summoned the respondent for 09.03.2010. On 09.03.2010, none appeared on behalf of the complainant before the Co...
Keshav @ Bichu Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :4. h APRIL, 2013 DECIDED ON :3. d JULY, 2013 + CRL.A. 575/2007 & CRL.M.A.1229/2011 KESHAV @ BICHU Through : ....Appellant Ms.Saahila Lambha, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI .Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant- Keshav @ Bichu impugns judgment dated 12.05.2007 in Sessions Case No. 50/2006 arising out of FIR No. 121/2006 PS Moti Nagar by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 392/394 read with Section 397 IPC. By an order dated 14.05.2007, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with total fine ` 4,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant- Keshav @ Bichu were that on 19.03.2006 at about 05.15 A.M. at Zakhira Flyover, he along with his associates Irfan and Salam (not arrested) in furtherance of common and mobile phone. It is also alleged that in the process of committing robbery Dilbagh Singh was injured ...
Sambhavana Vs. University of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:03. 07.2013 + W.P.(C) No.2982/2013 SAMBHAVANA ..... Petitioner. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Pankaj Sinha For the Respondent : Ms Pinki Anand, Sr. Advocate with Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal. Dr Anil Aneja, Assoc. Prof. Delhi University and Mr G. K. Singh, Deputy Registrar (Legal). CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:A) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of documents/representations considered in the meeting of Task Force, Academic Council and Executive Council of Delhi University. B) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to make necessary provision to introduce a bridge course for students wi...
Management of D.T.C. Vs. Jai Pal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6685/2010 % Date of decision: July 3, 2013 MANAGEMENT OF D.T.C. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Arati Mahajan Shedha, Adv. versus JAI PAL SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. By way of this petition, petitioner/management has challenged the award dated 7th October, 2009 passed in I.D. No.194/08/98 by the Presiding Officer Labour Court, petitioner/management respondent/workman Karkardooma has been Courts, directed Delhi to whereby reinstate the the in the same post where he was working with continuity of service for the purposes of fixing the wages, pension, gratuity only and no back wages have been awarded by the Labour Court.2. The facts relevant for the disposal of the present petition are as under:- Respondent/workman was working as a driver with the petitioner/management w.e.f. 29th March, 1989. On 18th November, 1996, a charge sheet was issued to him...
Ms. Brij Mohini Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5437/2007 MS. BRIJ MOHINI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Sharma and Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate % Date of Decision : July 03, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the refusal of the Respondent to allot to the Petitioner an alternate plot in lieu of plot in Khasra No.329/327, Block C, Jheel Khurenja, Krishna Nagar in respect of which the Petitioner had been vested with leasehold rights and the possession of which the Respondent has failed and neglected to hand over to the Petitioner owing to encroachments on the said plot of land.2. The facts necessary for appreciating the grievance of the Petitioner are as under.3. A plot measuring about 1100 sq. yards bearing Khasra No.329/327, situated in Block C, Jheel Khurenja, Krishna Nagar, New Delhi...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »