Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pioneer Products Vs. Alberto Culver International Inc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO 480/2011 % Date of Decision: July 1, 2013 PIONEER PRODUCTS Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr.Adv. with Mr.N.K.Kantawala, Mr.Praver Sharma, Mr.Satyender Chahar and Mr.Ritesh Mehra, Advs. versus ALBERTO CULVER INTERNATIONAL INC. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.S.K.Bansal with Mr.Vikas Khera, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.* 1. Present appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 1st October, 2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, New Delhi whereby application of the respondent under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC was allowed and the interim order dated 9th September, 2009 has been confirmed.2. Appellant herein is defendant no.1 before the learned trial court. Respondent herein is plaintiff before the learned trial court. The respondent/plaintiff has filed a suit under Section 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against appellant/d...
Late Smt. Bhagwati W/D of Late Sh. Rati Ram Throug Vs. Consolidation O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
2 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5147/2012 LATE SMT. BHAGWATI W/D OF LATE SH. RATI RAM THROUGH HER LEGAL HEIRS AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sat Pal Singh, Advocate. versus CONSOLIDATION OFFICER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kr. Garg, Advocate with Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate. Date of Decision:01. t July, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 02nd September, 2011 passed by the Financial Commissioner, Delhi, dismissing the petitioners application under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation & Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (for short Act, 1948) on the ground of delay.2. Since the order passed by the Financial Commissioner is a rather short one, the same is reproduced hereinbelow in its entirety:This is an application u/s 42 of the East Punjab Holding (Consolidation & Fragmentation) Act...
Rakesh Muni Tyagi Vs. Dtc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 17.05.2013 01.07.2013 W.P.(C) 5864/2011 RAKESH MUNI TYAGI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal & Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocates. versus DTC Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Parmod Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the industrial award dated 02.09.2008 passed in I.D. No.131/2005 by the Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby the Industrial Tribunal has answered the reference made to it by the Appropriate Government on 08.08.2005 against the petitioner workman and in favour of the respondent management. The reference made to the Industrial Tribunal by the Appropriate Government reads as follows: Whether the termination of Sh. Rakesh Muni Tyagi S/o Sh. Mangat Ram Tyagi from services is illegal and/ or unjustified and if...
Smt. Harbans Kaur Vs. Bhai Balbir Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2013. + CS(OS) 1294/2008 SMT. HARBANS KAUR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P. Banerjee and Ms. Princy Ponnan, Advocates. Versus BHAI BALBIR SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Animesh Rastogi, Advocate for D-1 & 25. Mr. Udit Gupta, Advocate for D-8, 9, 17, 18 & 26. Mr. Manish Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates for D-14. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT 01 07.2013 % 1. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit pleading: (i) that the plaintiff is the daughter of Bhai Sunder Dass who died on 27th October, 1963; (ii) that Bhai Sunder Dass besides his wife Smt. Somawanti, had five sons and one daughter namely the plaintiff; (iii) that Bhai Sunder Dass left his last Will dated 11th January, 1962 bequeathing all his properties in favour of his wife Smt. Somawanti; (iv) that at the time of institution of the suit, the plaintiff and the defendants No.1 to 24 ...
Rohit BhasIn and anr. Vs. Nandini Hotels
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: July 01, 2013 + ARB.P. No.70/2012 ROHIT BHASIN & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Ms.P.M. Saigal, Advocate versus NANDINI HOTELS Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Noopur Singhal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole independent arbitrator.2. As per petition, the facts are that the International Recreation Parks Pvt. Ltd. (IRPPL) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 20 th June, 2006 with the petitioners for transfer of the leasehold rights of the premises bearing No.309A on the Third Floor of Tower A admeasuring approx. 90.11 sq. mts. (940 sq. ft.) situated at Plot not A2, Sector 38A, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the said premises) to the petitioners. Agreement for sub-lease dated 19th July, 2006 execu...
Narendra Kumar Rajgarhia Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: June 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 01, 2013 Bail Appl. No.666/2013 & Crl.M.A. No.9293/2013 NARENDRA KUMAR RAJGARHIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Adv. with Mr.C.Mukund & Mr.Pankaj Jain, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr.Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State with I.O./Insp. Vivek Maheshwari, EOW. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Madhav Khurana & Mr.Vishal Malhotra, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the abovementioned application for grant of bail.2. The following grounds on which the bail must be granted: a. The Sessions court acted mechanically and did not apply his mind and passed an order without appreciating the requirements for the grant of bail, which are allegedly all in favour of the petitioner. b. He states that, out of all the banks that have allegedly been subject to fraud, only one filed ...
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % 21.02.2013 01.07.2013 + W.P.(C) 5775/1998 INDIAN OIL CORPN. LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. V.N. Koura, Ms. Paramjeet Benipal & Mr. Sumit Benipal, Advocates versus UOI & Anr. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Tushar Singh & Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for the respondent No. 1 Mr. B.K. Singh & Mr. Pradeep K. Jaiswal, Advocates for respondent No.2. JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd to seek the quashing of the gazetted notification No. S.O. 734(E) dated 21.10.1997, issued by the Central Government under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 (the Act for short) prohibiting employment of contract labour in respect of certain specified jobs being carried on in the petitioner corporations establishments.2. The petitioner is a Publ...
Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sanguine Technical Publishers ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: July 01, 2013 + O.M.P. 856/2012 & I.A No. No.4567/2013 DORLING KINDERSLEY(INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Akhil Sibal, Adv. with Mr.Sanjay S. Chhabra, Adv. versus SANGUINE TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS & ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms.Nidhi Jain, Adv. for R-1 to 3. Mr.Nikhil Rohatgi, Adv. for R-4. Mr.Saurabh Kirpal and Mr.Gurmehar S. Sistani, Advs. for applicant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of OMP No.856/2012 filed by the petitioner against the respondents seeking in the interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) pending the arbitration. The brief factual matrix of the matter leading up to the filing of the present petition can be enunciated as under: a) The petitioner namely Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd. claims to be engaged in the business of publishing wide varieties ...
Sh. J. Chandra Hassan Vs. M/S. Indian Airlines Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2333/1997 1st July, 2013 % SH. J.CHANDRA HASSAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Samir Sagar Vashistha, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus M/S. INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Advocate with Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-Sh. J.Chandra Hassan praying for grant of promotion to the post of Assistant Manager/Security Officer/Vigilance Officer (post being same only nomenclature being different) w.e.f 22.8.1994.2. Before me, on behalf of petitioner the entitlement to promotion is prayed on two counts. The first count is that the petitioner was empanelled alongwith one Sh. J.Sathyanarayan in the recruitment process pursuant to the recruitment process of the year 1993 and the petitioner had higher marks. As per the recruitment proces...
Sudhir Kumar Gupta Vs. S.P. Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: + 1st July, 2013 CS(OS) 1399/2011 & IA No.12036/2011 (u/O 7 R-11) SATYA PAL GUPTA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advs. Versus SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Adv. AND CS(OS) 1480/2011 + SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Adv. Versus S.P. GUPTA Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This order/judgment is on IA No.12036/2011 of the defendant in CS(OS) No.1399/2011 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and the impact if any thereof on CS(OS) No.1480/2011.2. Shri Satya Pal Gupta (SPG) has filed CS(OS) No.1399/2011 pleading:- (a). that SPG purchased half share of 2 storied house not K-115, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delh016. constructed over land ad measuring 528 sq. yds from Mrs. Kamal Mathur wife of Mr. Gulab Singh Mathur vide ...