Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lss Ocean Transport DMCC vs K.I. International Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
2026:MHC:827IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 22.01.2026 Pronounced on : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU O.S.A (CAD) No. 15 of 2024 and CMP No.3586 of 2024 LSS OCEAN TRANSPORT DMCC A Company incorporated under the appropriate Laws of the United Arab Emirates, Having its Registered Office at Unit #2708, Jumeirah Business Center 5- Cluster W - Dubai, United Arab Emirates Rep. by its Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Ram Jay Narayan, A6 Kumaravijayam, 99, Royapettah High Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. ..Appellant/Petitioner Vs1. K.I. (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED, A Company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, Having its Registered Office at #664, T. H. Road , Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081. Page1 of 352. Goyal Ispat Private Limited,A Company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, Having its Registered Office at #664, T. H. Road, Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081. ..Respondents/ Respondents This Or...
A.Anandhan, Vs R.Ramya,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5630 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.202738 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.This petitioner has been filed to recognize the Power Agent.2. This Court has gone through the affidavit and also heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The petitioner having resided in abroad and hence, in order to prosecute the revision, he has appointed the Power Agent.4. I have independently gone through theaffidavit filed in support of this petition to recognize and accept the cause title, and I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 (2/2) dna...
M. Smyrna Vs Mr. P. Vikram
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI M. Smyrna ..Petitioner(s) Vs Mr. P. Vikram Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk Office, Chennai 600 053. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate the Contempt Proceedings against the Respondent herein for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.17835 of 2025 dated 04.06.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.P.G. Thiyagu For Respondent : Mr.T.M. Rajangam Government Advocate -----ORDERLearned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the directions issued by this Court on 04.06.2025 in W.P. No.17835 of 2025 has been complied with. In support of his submission, he has produced a copy of the Legal Heirship Certificate of P. Metilda. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the aforesaid submission.2. The submissions made by learned counsel on either side are hereby recorded and the ord...
C.Ramalingam Vs The Management
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED C.Ramalingam S/o. Chinnan 4, Meenakshi Amman Nagar Koundampalayam, Coimbatore 641 030. ..Petitioner Vs The Management Sri Ranganathan Industries Private Limited, Edayapalayam, Coimbatore 641 025 ..RespondentPrayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the award dated 01.11.2021 passed by the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore in ID No.17 of 2018 quash the same and consequently direct the respondent Management to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service back wages and all other attendant benefits award costs For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondent : No appearance Page1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. Even the learned counsel for the Respondent is also not present. T...
M/s.Suha Drugs Distributors Vs The Deputy Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND WMP Nos.6990 & 6992 of 2026 M/s.Suha Drug Distributors Rep by its Managing Partner N Shanmugam, No.21A, 1st Floor, KVB upstairs, Cutcherry street, Gobichettipalayam, Erode, Tamil Nadu-638452 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Deputy Commissioner O/o.The Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST) (Appeal), Integrated New Commercial Taxes Building III floor, Pudur B Village, Erode-638 0022. The Assistant Commissioner (GST)Gobichettipalayam, Erode, Tamil Nadu-638452 ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pertaining to the impugned order dated 26.10.2024 in ZD331024201833Z passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ramana Kumar B For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government Pleader. Page1 of 6OrderMr.C.Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader takes ...
M.Swaminathan Vs K. Sridhar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Crl.M.P. No. 3535 of 2026 in Crl.R.C. No. 2883 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN,J.This petition is filed to implead the proposed party as 2nd respondent to the revision.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition for impleading is ordered. 27.02.2026 nv 1/2 (Note to Office: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title.) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Additional Chief Secretary Vs NEELIMA
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 24 / 02 / 2026PRONOUNCED ON : / 02 / 2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Crl.M.P.No.2597 of 2026 in H.C.P.No.2714 of 2025 1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chenani. 3.The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Puzhal-II, Chennai. 4.The Inspector of Police, R4, Soundarapandiyanar Angadi Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.280 of 2025) ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Neelima 2.Varaaki ... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to cancel the interim bail granted to respondent / petitioner's husband Varaaki / second respondent / detenu in H.C.P.No.2714 of 2025, dated 30.12.2025 passed by this Court and direct the second respondent/Varaaki to surrender to the Superintendent ...
N.GOWTHAMAN Vs The Secretary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI N.Gowthaman Plot No.13-A, Devi Natarajan Illam, Sai Nagar Phase-II, Aalapakkam, Chengalpattu-603 002 Presently working Associate Professor of Law Dr.Ambedkar Government law College, Pudupakkam ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the Representation dated 05.05.2025 and 20.05.2025 of the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Thyagarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Balathandayutham, SGP Page1 of 4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 05.05.2025 and 20.05.2025.2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing today at the admission stage itself.3. The learned counsel for the peti...
Dr. J. Jayakumar Vs Dr. P. Senthilkumar and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Dr.J.Jayakumar ... Petitioner vs1. Dr.P.Senthilkumar, The Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. Dr.R.Suganthy Rajakumari Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.3. Dr.D.K.Chitra, Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006. RespondentsPrayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for contempt of Court for having not complied with the orders of this Court dated 01.02.2024 and made in W.P.No.1657 of 2021. For Petitioner : Dr.S.Karpagapriya For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippusulthan Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience and non- compliance with the order dated 01.02.2024 in W.P.No.1657 of 2021.2. When the contempt petition is taken up for hearing on admission,the lear...
The Assistant Commissioner Vs Wipro Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.5487 of 2026 and W.A.SR.No.103509 of 2025Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.Mahesh, learned counsel representing Mr.Muthu Venkataraman, learned counsel on record for the respondent conveys no objection to the condonation of delay of 65 days in filing the Writ Appeal.2. Hence, and also for thereasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous petition, the delay of 65 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [C.K, J.] 27.02.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »