Dr. J. Jayakumar Vs Dr. P. Senthilkumar and 2 others

Dr. J. Jayakumar vs Dr. P. Senthilkumar and 2 others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419743

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1419743
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: CONT P/598/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. J. Jayakumar

Respondent

Dr. P. Senthilkumar and 2 others

Excerpt

.....proper channel. the petitioner had received the same in person and affixed his signature acknowledging the receipt of the proceedings on 06.06.2024 at 11.55 a.m.,4. the learned government advocate further submits that suppressing the aforesaid fact, the present contempt petition has been filed.5. submitting as above, the learned government advocate has placedbefore this court a copy of the proceedings dated 02.05.2024, along with the receipt of the said proceedings by the petitioner bearing his signature on 06.06.2024 at 11.55 am, as forwarded to him by the respondents under a covering letter dated 06.06.2024.6. the copy of the aforesaid proceedings as placed by the learned government advocate is taken on record.7. since, the present contempt petition is filed by the petitionersuppressing the aforementioned fact of disposal of the representation and receiving a copy of the said proceedings on 06.06.2024, this court had called upon the learned counsel for the petitioner, who had appeared in the morning session, as to why action should not be initiated against the petitioner for approaching this court with unclean hands by initiating the contempt petition on 27.01.2026 alleging non compliance with the order of this court in w.p.no.1657 of 2021.8. on this court pointing out the aforesaid fact to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time toverify the said fact from the petitioner and thus, the matter was passed over. the learned counsel for the petitioner was informed that the matter would be taken up at the end of the list. when the matter called at the end of the list, there was no representation.9. however, taking note of the fact that the respondents have compliedwith the order of this court dated 01.02.2024 and the same also been served on the petitioner, this court is of the view that the contempt petition filed by the petitioner alleging the willful disobedience of the order of this court dated.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.02.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Dr.J.Jayakumar ... Petitioner vs
1. Dr.P.Senthilkumar, The Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2. Dr.R.Suganthy Rajakumari Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.
3. Dr.D.K.Chitra, Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 006. … Respondents
Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for contempt of Court for having not complied with the orders of this Court dated 01.02.2024 and made in W.P.No.1657 of 2021. For Petitioner : Dr.S.Karpagapriya For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippusulthan Government Advocate

ORDER

This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience and non- compliance with the order dated 01.02.2024 in W.P.No.1657 of 2021.

2. When the contempt petition is taken up for hearing on admission,

the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the respondents have complied with the direction of this Court by considering the representation of the petitioner as directed by this Court by proceedings dated 02.05.2024.

3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the

respondents further submits that the respondents had disposed of the representation of the petitioner as directed by this Court in W.P.No.1657 of 2021, and had communicated a copy of the said proceedings to the petitioner through proper channel. The petitioner had received the same in person and affixed his signature acknowledging the receipt of the proceedings on 06.06.2024 at 11.55 a.m.,

4. The learned Government Advocate further submits that suppressing the aforesaid fact, the present contempt petition has been filed.

5. Submitting as above, the learned Government Advocate has placed

before this Court a copy of the proceedings dated 02.05.2024, along with the receipt of the said proceedings by the petitioner bearing his signature on 06.06.2024 at 11.55 am, as forwarded to him by the respondents under a covering letter dated 06.06.2024.

6. The copy of the aforesaid proceedings as placed by the learned Government Advocate is taken on record.

7. Since, the present contempt petition is filed by the petitioner

suppressing the aforementioned fact of disposal of the representation and receiving a copy of the said proceedings on 06.06.2024, this Court had called upon the learned counsel for the petitioner, who had appeared in the morning session, as to why action should not be initiated against the petitioner for approaching this Court with unclean hands by initiating the contempt petition on 27.01.2026 alleging non compliance with the order of this Court in W.P.No.1657 of 2021.

8. On this Court pointing out the aforesaid fact to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to

verify the said fact from the petitioner and thus, the matter was passed over. The learned counsel for the petitioner was informed that the matter would be taken up at the end of the list. When the matter called at the end of the list, there was no representation.

9. However, taking note of the fact that the respondents have complied

with the order of this Court dated 01.02.2024 and the same also been served on the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the contempt petition filed by the petitioner alleging the willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 01.02.2024 in W.P.No.1657 of 2021 cannot be proceeded with.

10. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is dismissed. 27.02.2026 dh Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No

Speaking Order/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No To

1. Dr.P.Senthilkumar, The Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. Dr.R.Suganthy Rajakumari Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

3. Dr.D.K.Chitra, Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 006. T.VINOD KUMAR.J., dh 27.02.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Dr. J. Jayakumar vs Dr. P. Senthilkumar and 2 others Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar