Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Assistant Commissioner Vs Wipro Ltd.,

The Assistant Commissioner vs Wipro Ltd.,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1421315

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/5487/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Assistant Commissioner

Respondent

Wipro Ltd.,

Excerpt

cmp.no.5487 of 2026 and w.a.sr.no.103509 of 2025dr. anita sumanth, j.andc.kumarappan, j.(order of the court was made by dr. anita sumanth, j.) mr.mahesh, learned counsel representing mr.muthu venkataraman, learned counsel on record for the respondent conveys no objection to the condonation of delay of 65 days in filing the writ appeal.2. hence, and also for thereasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petition, the delay of 65 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned and this miscellaneous petition is ordered.3. registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [a.s.m, j.] [c.k, j.] 27.02.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP.No.5487 of 2026 and W.A.SR.No.103509 of 2025

Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.

and

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.Mahesh, learned counsel representing Mr.Muthu Venkataraman, learned counsel on record for the respondent conveys no objection to the condonation of delay of 65 days in filing the Writ Appeal.

2. Hence, and also for the

reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous petition, the delay of 65 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

3. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [C.K, J.] 27.02.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial