Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.Ramalingam Vs The Management

C.Ramalingam vs The Management

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419471

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/3248/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.Ramalingam

Respondent

The Management

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice shamim ahmed c.ramalingam s/o. chinnan 4, meenakshi amman nagar koundampalayam, coimbatore 641 030. ..petitioner vs the management sri ranganathan industries private limited, edayapalayam, coimbatore 641 025 ..respondentprayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the award dated 01.11.2021 passed by the additional labour court, coimbatore in id no.17 of 2018 quash the same and consequently direct the respondent management to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service back wages and all other attendant benefits award costs for petitioner : no appearancefor respondent : no appearance page1 of 3orderwhen the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. even the learned counsel for the respondent is also not present. the matter is of the year 2022. it appears that the petitioner as well as his counsel has no interest to pursue the matter any further. accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. there is no order as to costs. neutral citation: yes/no mrn to the additional labour court, coimbatore. page2 of 3shamim ahmed, j.mrn page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED C.Ramalingam S/o. Chinnan 4, Meenakshi Amman Nagar Koundampalayam, Coimbatore 641 030. ..Petitioner Vs The Management Sri Ranganathan Industries Private Limited, Edayapalayam, Coimbatore 641 025 ..Respondent

Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the award dated 01.11.2021 passed by the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore in ID No.17 of 2018 quash the same and consequently direct the respondent Management to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service back wages and all other attendant benefits award costs For Petitioner : No appearance

For Respondent : No appearance Page1 of 3

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. Even the learned counsel for the Respondent is also not present. The matter is of the year 2022. It appears that the Petitioner as well as his Counsel has no interest to pursue the matter any further. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of Prosecution. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. There is no order as to costs. Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN To The Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore. Page2 of 3

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

MRN Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial