Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In the instant case, it comes to be known that the first respondent had issued a proceedings in Ref.No.TNTEU/Elig/2016/188 undated addressed to the Principal of the third respondent stating that the petitioner was admitted to B.Ed., programme without following the admission guidelines (G.O.No.(1D) No.168 dated 07.07.2015). Further, in the said proceedings, in the remarks column, it is stated as under: Remarks 12th std. is not completed. Hence, she is NOT ELIGIBLE for admission to B.Ed., Programme. 3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Directorate of Distance and Continuing Education of the second respondent University in ENROL.No.A10C25079006, dated 13.06.2016, had inter alia stated that 'A pass in this course (Degree Bridge Course II year) is equivalent to a pass in +2/H.Sc. 4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the first respondent submits that the petitioner is not eligible for the B.Ed., cour...
K. Ravichandran Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order, dated 09.07.2015 of the First Respondent made in his proceedings Pa.Mu.P5/33768/2014, confirming the order of the 2nd Respondent, dated 18.06.2014 made in his proceedings Pa.Mu.(P1)85452/2012 and quash the same.) Order: 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner; the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and the Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ petition prayed for calling for the records pertaining to the order, dated 09.07.2015 passed by the First Respondent/District Revenue Officer, in confirming the order of the Second Respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District, dated 18.06.2014. 4. The Writ Facts:- ...
S.V.S. Educational and Social Service Trust Vs. Government of India, M ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 3rd respondent culminating in Rc.No.Affln.1(3)/11426/2011 dated 08.04.2016 of the Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai-32 and quash the same and consequently direct the third respondent to issue provisional affiliation to the petitioner institution for the academic year 2015-2016 to run the Bachelor of Homeopathy Medicine and Surgery Course (BHMS) Degree course in their College viz., S.V.S. College of Homeopathy and Research Institute, Kallakurichi, Villupuram District and further direct the third respondent to register the admission of the students in the petitioner institution.) 1. The petitioner Trust intend to start and run a Homeopathy Medical College in the name of SVS Medical College of Homeopathy and Research Institute at Kallakurichi, Villupuram District and had r...
A. Krishnan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corru ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 20.05.2016.) 1. In this Crl.O.P., under Section 482 Cr.P.C,. Krishnan, the petitioner herein, came forward to direct the 2nd respondent, namely, DSP, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar District at Virudhunagar to register a criminal case as against Malarvizhi, V.A.O., Rajapalayam Town, investigate and proceed further as per law. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the said woman V.A.O is a corrupt lady. She acted with corrupt motive. As she is a corrupt woman she has to be corrected by taking action under the prevention of Corruption Act. 3. Almost the power exercised by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is akin to the power exercised by a learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. The difference is one being exercised by this Court and the other being exercised by the Magistrate. In sum ...
K. Gopalram Vs. Muthumari
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to Crl.A.No.2 of 2015 in Crl.M.P.No.4354 of 2013 in M.C.No.76 of 2014 (Crl.M.P.No.1828 of 2010) on the file of the 6thAdditional District Court, Madurai, and to set aside the same.) 1. Gopalram, party-in-person, aggrieved by certain portions of the order, dated 06.11.2015, passed in C.A.No.2 of 2015, by the learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, Madurai, has directed this revision. 2. The revision petitioner is the husband of the respondent. Difference of opinion arose between them. Now, they are not living together. It is the outcome of the family dispute. In the circumstances, the respondent filed Cr.M.P.No.1828 of 2010, under D.V.Act, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai. Later, it was transferred to the file of the learned Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, and renumbered as M.C.No.76 of 2014. In the said case, almost the main family members...
P. Chithiraiselvi and Others Vs. The Tahsildar, Santhankulam Taluk, Th ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant patta entry in the Petitioner's name in respect of the properties in S.No.278, in Flat No.29, situated at Mudalur, Santhankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District in the Petitioner's name, in the light of the applications, Jamabandhi 1420, Pasali year on 3.6.2011. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant patta entry in the Petitioner's name in respect of the properties in S.No.141 A/1B in Plot No.14, situated at Sivanathapuram Pannamparai Village, Santhankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District in the Petitioner's name, in the light of the applications, Jamabandhi 1420, Pasali year on 12.6.2014. Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the r...
Parvathammal Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order in C.M.P.No.28/2016 in S.C.No.51/2011 dated 23.03.2016 on the file of the learned III Additional District cum Sessions Judge, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District.) 1. This petition has been filed to set aside the order in C.M.P.No.28/2016 in S.C.No.51/2011 dated 23.03.2016 on the file of the learned III Additional District cum Sessions Judge, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. It is common knowledge that Rajkumar, a Kannada actor and others were abducted by the Forest brigand Veerappan and was kept in captivity for a long time until they were released by the abductors. In this regard, a case in Cr.No.90/2000 was registered against some persons and after completing the investigation, a Final Report has been filed and the case is now pending in S.C.No.51/2011 before the III Addi...
M/s. Soudal, Joint Stock Company, Chennai Vs. The Registrar, Trade Mar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the impugned order, i.e., the return endorsement dated 30.11.2012 returning the petitioner's representation dated 31.10.2012 (including interlocutory petition and affidavit of renewal) and to quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to take on file and process the petitioner's representation dated 31.10.2012 (including interlocutory petition and affidavit of renewal).) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. This writ petition has been filed, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the endorsement made by the respondent, on 30.11.2012, on the application of the petitioner, for the renewal of the Certificate of Registration, bearing No.297539, d...
M/s. VenturEast Proactive Fund LLC, Mauritius and Others Vs. C. Mohan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 O.S. Rules and Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 03.08.2015 in Appl. No.139 of 2013 in I.N.No.57 of 2013 on the file of original side of this Court.) Sanjay Kishan Kaul, CJ 1. The appeal is directed against the impugned order of the learned Single Judge dated 03.08.2015 dismissing the application filed by the appellants under Section 9 (5) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, III of 1909 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), as not maintainable. 2. At the inception, we may state that we would have sympathy for the appellants because their investment is stuck, but the remedy they have chosen is certainly not what is available to the appellants and we, thus, fully agree with the conclusion of the learned Single Judge. 3. The controversy arises from the investments made by the appellants in equity and compulsorily convertible cumulative participating preference shares and the allegation that the amounts have be...
A.P. Thambi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 08.02.2016, and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. The petitioner came forward, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for a direction to the respondents to register a case as against the H.R. and C.E., officials and certain connected persons in Mandaikadu Bagavathi Amman Temple, in Kanyakumari District. 2. The petitioner is interested in the proper running of the said Bagavathi Amman Temple. It is alleged that there are misdeeds, irregularities and commission of criminal misconducts with regard to Archana Plates and various other items. 3. The respondents have filed counter and also a status report. 4. It is stated that the complaint of the petitioner has been forwarded to the Joint Commissioner, H.R. and C.E., Suchindram, for enquiry. Earlier, the petitioner filed a writ petition in W.P (MD) No...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »