Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Latha Vs. State through the Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 31.01.2016 and consequently direct the respondent to investigate to file a final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 31.01.2016 and consequently direct the respondent to investigate to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. Earlier, this petitioner had given a complaint, in which a petition enquiry in CSR No.36 of 2016 was conducted and the same was also closed as money dispute. Now, again the petitioner has sent the present complaint by post. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out ...
Anna Packiam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to include and alter the penal provisions of Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act and Section 376 IPC in Crime No.45 of 2016 by the petitioner's complaint dated 12.02.2016 and to file the alteration report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to include and alter the penal provisions of Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act and Section 376 IPC in Crime No.45 of 2016 by the petitioner's complaint dated 12.02.2016 and to file the alteration report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that investigation in Crime No.45 of 2016 has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kovilpatti on 01.03.2016. 3. In view of the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her rem...
J. Jayakar Vs. J. Susheela and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer in C.R.P.No.1131 of 2015 Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.192 of 2014 in O.S.No.5348 of 2012 pending on the file of XVIII Additional Judge, Civil Court, Chennai and allow the revision petition. Prayer in C.R.P.No.3616 of 2013 Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 01.08.2013 made in I.A.No.10 of 2013 in O.S.No.5348 of 2012 pending on the file of XVIII Additional Judge, Civil Court, Chennai and allow the revision petition.) Common Order: C.R.P.No.3616 of 2013 has been filed against the order of the trial Court dated 01.08.2013 made in I.A.No.10 of 2013 in O.S.No.5348 of 2012 seeking rejection of the plaint in the said suit under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. During the pendency of the Civil Revision Petition, the petitioner herein, who figures as the first respondent in the above said original suit, ...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Petitioners/Appellants have filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court to condone the delay of 1388 days in projecting the Writ Appeal Sr.No.15891 of 2016 as against the order dated 09.04.2012 in W.P.No.8869 of 2012. 2. According to the Petitioners/Appellants, the particulars of Writ Petitioners were not readily available together with the order copies immediately and therefore, the Director of School Education, Chennai (2nd Petitioner/2nd Appellant) sent a communication to all the Chief Educational Officers in Rc.No.3841/C5/ E4/2011 dated 22.03.2013 by issuing instructions to send the particulars of the orders passed by this Court in similar cases. As a matter of fact, the 2nd Petitioner/2nd Appellant had received the entire information in detailed format from the respective Chief Educational Officers during the last week of March 2013 pertaining to 500 Writ Petitions covered by 3444 Writ Petitioners, who obtain...
P. Sankareswari Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.01.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.01.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint, it essentially appears to be a money transaction between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Therefore, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Arasan and Another Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case for the allaged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC and Sections of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Ordinance 2014 on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 07.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case for the allaged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC and Sections of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Ordinance 2014 on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 07.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.144 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the 3rd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a...
Vinayagamoorthy Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Then ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to issue appropriate direction to dispose proceedings pending in C.C.No. 79/2012 before learned Judicial Magistrate Court Bodinayakkanoor in pursuance of the Crime no. 15/2011 on the file of the respondent police in speedy manner.) 1. This petition has been filed to issue appropriate direction to dispose proceedings pending in C.C.No. 79/2012 before learned Judicial Magistrate Court Bodinayakkanoor in pursuance of the Crime no. 15/2011 on the file of the respondent police in speedy manner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that the accused himself has filed this petition for a direction to the Trial Court to complete the trial in C.C.No.79 of 2012 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court Bodinayakkanoor. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the case is pending from the year 2012, thi...
Periyakaruppan and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to grant permission and to provide police protection to conduct the Aadalum Paadalum dance Programme on 16.03.2016 from 8.00 pm. to 12.00 am. in pursuant to the Panguni Pongal Thiruvizha Festival of Arulmighu Manthaiyamman Thirukoil situated at Kalyanipatti Village Uthappanaickanur Post Usilampatti Taluk Madurai District by considering the Petitioner representation dated 7.3.2016.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondent herein to grant permission and to provide police protection to conduct the Aadalum Paadalum dance Programme on 16.03.2016 from 8.00 pm. to 12.00 am. in pursuant to the Panguni Pongal Thiruvizha Festival of Arulmighu Manthaiyamman Thirukoil situated at Kalyanipatti Village Uthappanaickanur Post Usilampatti Taluk Madurai District by considering the Petitioner representation dated 7.3.2016. 2. L...
Annamalai Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
S. Nagamuthu, J. (Prayer: This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 28th June 2012 made in S.C.No.111 of 2010 on the file of the learned Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram District, Chengalpattu, convicting and sentencing the appellant to undergo life imprisonment for the offence u/s 302 IPC and a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo R.I. for three months.) 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.111 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram. He stood charged for the offence under Section 302 IPC. By judgment dated 28.06.2012, he has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused/appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: [a] The deceased in this...
Seetharamu and Another Vs. State Rep. by, The Superintendent of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint before the petitioner on 04.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint before the petitioner on 04.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that for the same set of complaint given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted on 07.02.2016 and again, the petitioner has sent the very same complaint through post. Therefore, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....