Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Syed Ali Vs. Balasubramanian
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for his deliberate and willfull disobedience of the order of this Court made in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12344 of 2015 dated 09.07.2015.) 1. This contempt petition has been filed for punishing the respondent herein for wilfully disobeying the orders of this Court dated 09.07.2015 made in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12344 of 2015. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the order dated 09.07.2015 has been complied with and the case has been closed as mistake of fact. A copy of the RCS notice has been filed before this Court. 3. In view of the above submission, this Court is of the view that nothing survives for further adjudication in this Contempt Petition. Hence, the Contempt Petition is closed. No costs....
VK. Veerappan and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Pudukkottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant permission and give police protection to conduct Dance and Song Programme and using Box Speakers at about 8.00 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. on 23.03.2016 in front of the "VALLAMBAKADU ARULMIGU SREE RAJANARAYANA PERUMAL SREE ARIYANAYAGI AMMAN TEMPLE" Vallambakadu Village Aranthangi Taluk Pudukkottai District.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondent to grant permission and give police protection to conduct Dance and Song Programme and using Box Speakers at about 8.00 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. on 23.03.2016 in front of the "VALLAMBAKADU ARULMIGU SREE RAJANARAYANA PERUMAL SREE ARIYANAYAGI AMMAN TEMPLE" Vallambakadu Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct a dance Programme on 23.03.2016 in front of the "VALLAMBAKADU ARULMIG...
Dr. Ramanathan Ram Kumar and Others Vs. The Union of India, Represente ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for issuing a Writ of Mandamus forbearing respondents 3 to 7 from implementing the revised fee structure and stipend guidelines prescribed by the National Board of Examinations and adopted by the Railway Board as contained in the Letter of the fourth respondent dated 31.10.2014 and the consequent circular issued by the seventh respondent dated 27.11.2014.) 1. The petitioners are post Graduates in Medicine and are undergoing Super Speciality or Board Speciality Courses as the case may be in Southern Railway Head Quarters Hospital, Perambur, Chennai as Trainees from the year 2015-2016. They have come forward with this writ petition seeking for issuance of a Mandamus to restrain the respondents 3 to 7 from giving effect to the revised fee structure and stipend guidelines prescribed by the National Board of Examinations and adopted by the Railway Board as contained in the Letter of the fourth respondent dated 31...
C. Singaravelan and Others Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register a case on the basis of the petitioner complaint dated 21.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a case on the basis of the petitioner complaint dated 21.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 21.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 2nd respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 21.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With the above direction, this Criminal Or...
V.K. Veerasangili Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to take appropriate action as against the accused who are tampering the witness by considering the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to take appropriate action as against the accused who are tampering the witness by considering the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that on a direction issued by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.21019 of 2015 dated 20.11.2015, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.9 of 2016 for offences under Sections 147, 341, 427, 294(b), 323, 506(i) and 379 (ii) IPC against seven accused. The grievance of the petitioner is that Police have not taken any action against the accused and therefore, they are allowing them to move freely and that...
D. Arul Dass Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to give permission and protection for Celebrating the festival in St. Sebastians Church at Monganoor Village, Kandavarkottai Taluk, Pudukottai District and conducting the Adal Padal Programme on 05.04.2016 between 8 PM to 12 AM.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents herein to give permission and protection for Celebrating the festival in St. Sebastians Church at Monganoor Village, Kandavarkottai Taluk, Pudukottai District and conducting the Adal Padal Programme on 05.04.2016 between 8 PM to 12 AM. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct Adal Padal on 05.04.2016 in connection with the festival in St.Sebastians Church at Monganoor Village, Kandavarkottai Taluk, Pudukottai District. He would further submit that in this connection, a representation was...
Govindan and Others Vs. The Secretary to the Government, Home Prohibit ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 2nd respondent in CMP No.65/Goondas/Salem City/2015 dated 13.8.2015 and quash the same and further direct the respondents to produce the body of the detenu, Govindan @ Thalaivetti Govindan, now confined at Central Prison, Salem, before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the detenu, namely, Govindan @ Thalaivetti Govindan, aged 35 years, son of Ganesan, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in CMP No.65/Goondas/Salem City/2015 dated 13.8.2015, passed by the 2nd respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pi...
Sivaranjani and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 08.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.4 of 2016 dated 27.02.2016 for offences under Sections 498(A), 506(i) IPC r/w Section 4 of DP Act. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
R. Prakasam Vs. The Director General of Police, Santhome High Road, Ch ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Respondents 1 and 2 herein to order for further CBCID investigation on right direction as per the representation of the Petitioner dated 16.6.2014 and dated 10.9.2015 and without any further delay and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to order for further CBCID investigation on right direction as per the representation of the Petitioner dated 16.06.2014 and dated 10.09.2015 and without any further delay. 2. Heard the petitioner / Party-in-Person. 3. Shorn of unnecessary frills, the case of the petitioner can be summarized as follows: i) The petitioner is a lawyer by profession and on 07.02.2014, when he was going by his motorbike, it is alleged by him that two unknown persons came in a bike and attacked him with stick on his head and shoulder, on account of which, he fell down unconscious on the road. W...
Rahmathullah Vs. State Rep By The Home Secretary, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the respondent Nos.5 and 6 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.10.2015.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the respondent Nos.5 and 6 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.10.2015. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner is a history sheeted rowdy in H.S.No.564 of 2008. That apart, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to the respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the respondents 5 and 6, who are Government Officials. Hence, this Court finds no reasons to entertain this writ petition, directing the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider the representation dated 28.10.2015 given by the petitioner. This Writ Petition...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »