Chennai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
L. Ravikumar Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Thoothukudi and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to file final report within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court in connection with the case in Crime No.105 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to file final report within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court in connection with the case in Crime No.105 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2016. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations, a time bound order cannot be passed in this petition, directing the respondent police to file a final report. 4. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to expedite the investigation and file a final report as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, c...
J. Vasanthi and Others N. Ramani Kanthammal and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 23.12.2014, made in I.A.No.94 of 2014 in O.S.No.20 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul.) 1. This memorandum of Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order dated 23.12.2014, made in I.A.No.94 of 2014 in O.S.No.20 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul. 2. The petitioners are defendants 3,4 and 5 in the Suit in O.S.No.20 of 2014. One N.Ramani Kanthammal filed the Suit in O.S.No.20 of 2014, for declaration that said Ramani Kanthammal and the seventh defendant in the Suit are the owners of the suit schedule property, for declaration that the sale deeds, in Doc.No.922/1991, dated 30.08.1991, Doc.No.805/1991, dated 07.08.1991, Doc No.330/1993, dated 23.03.1993, Doc No.2395/1994, dated 04.01.1994, Doc.No.1239/2002, dated 16.07.2002, Doc.No.2096/2002, dated 10.06.2002,Doc.No.2097/...
Palaniyammal and Others The Government of Tamil Nadu represented by it ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Common Prayer in W.P.Nos.20496 of 2013 and 23804 of 2013 :Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners on and from 2009 as provided under G.O.Ms.No.199, dated 12.08.1997 with all consequential and attendant benefits. Prayer in Cont.P.No.1008 of 2014: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the order of this Court in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.20496 of 2013, dated 25.08.2013.) 1. Since the common question has arisen for consideration in both these writ petitions, these writ petitions are disposed of by way of this common order. 2. The petitioners in W.P.No.20496 of 2013 are Sanitary Workers employed in the second respondent Town Panchayat. The petitioners in W.P.No.23804 of 2013 are also Sanitary Workers in the second respondent Town Panchayat. In total, there ...
S. Janarthanan Vs. S. Dhanabalan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur to dispose of the C.A.No. 37 of 2014 within the time frame stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur to dispose of the C.A.No.37 of 2014 within the time frame stipulated by this Honourable Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. On 10.02.2016, this Court passed the following order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is seen that the respondent was convicted in C.C.No.1 of 2014 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi on 01.04.2015, challenging which, the respondent has filed C.A.No.37 of 2015, which is pending on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur. 3. The petitioner herein, who is the complainant, is a...
Nixon Azariah Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, Pudukkottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.143 of 2015 and to file a charge sheet in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.143 of 2015 and to file a charge sheet in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.143 of 2015 has been completed and the final report is pending with the Assistant Director of Prosecution for his approval. 3. Under such circumstances, two months' time is granted to the respondent police to file either a final report or closure report, as the case may be, before the concerned jurisdictional Court. 4. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
Murali Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police (L and O)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the conviction and sentence passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur @ Poonamallee, in S.C.No.102 of 2011 dated 24.07.2012.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.102 of 2011 on the file of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur @ Poonamallee. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302 and 506(ii) of IPC. The trial court, by judgement dated 24.07.2012, convicted the appellant under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a further period of one year for offence under Section 302 of IPC and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a further period of six months for offence under Section 506(ii) of IPC. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, ...
Dr.P. Saravanan Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Central Cri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.84 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, Madurai District and quash the same with regard to the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the entire records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.84 of 2015 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, Madurai District and quash the same with regard to the petitioner. 2. Heard Mr.K.Chellapandian, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for R1 on 15.03.2016 and posted the matter to 16.03.2016 for arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. As this Court was not inclined to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.84 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, Madurai District, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endor...
The State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary to Government Lab ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenging the order dated 25.04.2012 passed in W.P. No.11975 of 2012.) Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. This intra-Court appeal arises from the order dated 25 April 2012 passed in W.P. No.11975 of 2012, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge, referring to and relying on several judicial pronouncements made earlier, passed the following order: 7. On a perusal of the above referred orders, it is evident that persons similarly placed like the petitioners were granted regularisation of their services on completion of 10 years of service by relaxing the rule whenever required in terms of G.O. Ms.No.22, P and A.R. Department dated 28.02.2006 and they were paid arrears of full time salary. The Government, having passed such an order, has to apply the same to all similarly placed persons without any discrimination. 8. Applying the above said orders passed by this Court to the facts of the case, the writ petitions are allow...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited. Vs. Muthumeenal, W/o. Chandran ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 04.01.2016, passed in I.A.No.973 of 2015 in M.C.O.P.No.2275 of 2015, by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madurai.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 04.01.2016, passed in I.A.No.973 of 2015 in M.C.O.P.No.2275 of 2015, by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madurai. 2. The petitioner/Insurance Company is the second respondent in the M.C.O.P. The respondents are the claimants. They filed a claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.50 lakhs as compensation for the death of one Chandran @ Ramachandran, due to the accident occurred on 12.06.2014. The petitioner filed I.A.No.973 of 2015 to accept the affidavit filed by them and pass orders on the jurisdiction issue. 3. According to the petitioner, the accident occurred within...
V. Pandian Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, Sivagangai and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent not to harass the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 1st respondent not to harass the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that neither a case nor a petition enquiry is pending against this petitioner on the file of the respondent police. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »