Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

L. Ravikumar Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Thoothukudi and Another

L. Ravikumar vs The Commissioner of Police, Thoothukudi and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 16, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191996

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 4539 of 2016
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

L. Ravikumar

Respondent

The Commissioner of Police, Thoothukudi and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to file final report within the time stipulated by this honourable court in connection with the case in crime no.105 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2016.) 1. this petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to file final report within the time stipulated by this honourable court in connection with the case in crime no.105 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2016. 2. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. taking into consideration the nature of allegations, a time bound order cannot be passed in this petition, directing the respondent police to file a final report. 4. hence, this criminal original petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to expedite the investigation and file a final report as expeditiously as possible. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to file final report within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court in connection with the case in Crime No.105 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2016.)

1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to file final report within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court in connection with the case in Crime No.105 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent dated 20.01.2016.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations, a time bound order cannot be passed in this petition, directing the respondent police to file a final report.

4. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to expedite the investigation and file a final report as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial