Chennai Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Arumugham Vs. Mtc Ltd Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.3998 of 2008 S.Arumugham ... Appellant Vs. Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai Division) Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 01.09.2008 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.440 of 2004, on the file of the VI Small Causes Court, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.R.Kalaiarasan For Respondent : Mr.M.Deivanandan - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / petitioner has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.440 of 2004, on the file of the VI Small Causes Court, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner has filed the claim in M.C.O.P.No.440 of 2004, claiming compensation of a sum of Rs.13,0...
M/S.Hotel Supreme Private Limited, Vs. P.Kannan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30/08/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P(NPD)(MD)NO.1423 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 M/s.Hotel Supreme Private Limited, No.10, West Perumal Maistry Street, Madurai-1 ..Petitioner/Respondent/Respondent vs P.Kannan ..Respondent/Petitioner/Claimant/ Respondent PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order passed in E.A.No.33 of 2012 in E.P.No.41 of 2012 in M.C.O.P.No.1532 of 2008, on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate(Motor Accident Claims Tribunal).Madurai, dated 4.6.2013 !For Petitioner :M/s.V.Kannan :ORDER The respondent in the main Civil Revision Petition made a claim in the said M.C.O.P for compensation arraying the revision Petitioner as fiRs.respondent, being the owner of the offending vehicle and the New India Assurance Company Limited, being the second respondent on the premise that the vehicle in question had be...
Mrs.S.Komala Vs. Mrs.S.Sumathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 8.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN C.S.No.892 of 2010 1 MRS.S.KOMALA2D.SARASWATHI3M.PRAVEEN4D.VIJAYAKUMAR5R.KANAKAMMAL [ PLAINTIFFS ]. Vs 1 MRS.S.SUMATHI W/O.SHANKAR134D SOUTH LOCK STREET CHELLAPPA GARDEN, KOTTUR, CHENNAI-85. 2 K.BANUMATHY W/O.LATE.R.KRISHNAMOORTHY NO.13/4D, SOUTH LOCK STREET CHELLAPPA GARDEN EXTENSION KOTTUR, CHENNAI-85. 3 R.CHANDRASEKAR S/O.LATE.R.RANGANATHA NAICKER FLAT NO.1, DOOR NO.12 S.S.NAGAR EXTENSION, THIRUMANJAM KULAM STREET THIRUMULLAIVOYAL CHENNAI-62. [ DEFENDANTS ]. This Civil Suit has been filed to pass a Judgment and Decree: i) declaring the plaintiffs 1 to 4 are each entitled to 1/7th share in the schedule mentioned property referred to in the Schedule A and effect a partition proceedings by metes and bounds and put them into possession of their separate share. ii) declaring that the plaintiffs 1 to 3 and 5 are each entitled to 1/7th share in the agricultural lands in Melapakkam village,...
Banumathi Vs. Muniammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K. SUGUNA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(PD) No.2813 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 1.Banu @ Banumathi 2.Elumalai 3.Mani ... Petitioners v. Muniammal ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 14.6.2007 passed in I.A.No.25 of 2007 in O.S.No.472 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruvannamalai. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Rajan For Respondent : Mr.J.Ramakrishnan ORDER M.DURAISWAMY, J A learned Judge of this Court has referred the above Civil Revision Petition to a Division Bench for considering the following question:- ".Whether an Advocate Commissioner can be appointed to ascertain the age of a building?.".2. Before the learned single Judge, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners relied upon a judgment reported in 2002 (2) CTC199(Saraswathy and another v...
Arun P.Diwakar Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 30.08.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.Nos.1123 to 1125 of 2013 Arun P.Diwakar ..Petitioner in WP.1123/2013 S.Subramanian ..Petitioner in WP.1124/2013 Aruna Ravikumar ..Petitioner in WP.1125/2013 versus 1.The State Bank of India, Rep. By its Chairman, Corporate Centre, Madam Cama Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021. 2.The General Manager, Network-I, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, 16, College Lane, Chennai 600 006. 3.The Assistant General Manager (HR).HR Department, Local Head Office, Circle Top House, Post Box No.737, 16, College lane, Chennai 600 006..Respondents in all WPs. PRAYER: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the issue of the impugned ordeRs.namely, Lr.No.L&D/36 dated 05.04.2011 issued by the third respondent and Lr.No.L&D/ME201011/218 dated 10.05.2011 issued by the second r...
R.Shanmugam Vs. Spl Dist Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 8-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.30296 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 1. R.Shanmugam 2. Kamalam 3. Lalitha 4. V.Geethanjali 5. V.Rajkumar 6. Boopathi 7. Minor Harini .. Petitioners. Versus 1. The Special District Revenue Officer (L.A.) National Highways-47 & 67, No.3, Savarimuthu Chettiar Street, Red Fields, Coimbatore-641 045.2. Gopalsamy .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.282/2010 NH-47, dated 30.8.2011 on the file of the 1st respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st petitioner herein to refer the dispute to the competent Civil Court at Coimbatore District. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader (R1) Ms.P.T.Asha (R2) for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates ORDER Heard the learned counsel a...
G.Krishnaveni Vs. Bharathiar University
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 08.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T. SELVAM W.P.Nos.8298 of 2003 and 1952 of 2006 W.P.No.8298 of 2003 G.Krishnaveni .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Registrar, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore. 2.The Vice Chancellor, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the first respondent dated 06.07.2001 issued in the proceedings No.E3/13479-5/2009 and the order of the second respondent dated 20.03.2002 issued in the proceedings of the Vice Chancellor No.E3/13479/2002 and quash the same. W.P.No.1952 of 2006 G.Krishnaveni .. Petitioner vs. The Registrar, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore. .. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the respondent dated 22.12.2005 issued in Memorand...
Universal Shoe Company Vs. Belluti Simone
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:29. 08.2013 Coram: The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.Jaichandren and The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.M.Sundresh O.S.A.Nos.238 to 240 of 2013 1.M/s.Universal Shoe Company, rep.by its Partners. 2.V.Arshad Ahmed 3.M.G.Riyaz Ahmed 4.Glides Shoes Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Directors, V.Arshad Ahmed. .. Appellants in all the Appeals vs. Belluti Simone .. 1st respondent in all Appeals INAC SPA DIFISIONE IGI, Italy. .. 2nd respondent in OSA No.239 of 2013 PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Order 36, Rule 9 of the O.S. Rules, r/w. Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order, dated 7.1.2011, in O.A.No.482/2011, A.Nos.2532 and 3117 of 2011. For appellants : Mr.T.P.Sankaran For respondents : Mr.G.K.Muthukumar for M/s.GMS Law Associates ----- JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was made by M.M.Sundresh, J.]. These Original Side Appeals have been preferred by the respondents in O.P.No.477 of 2011, being aggrieved against the order passed by the learned single Judge in allow...
1.The Regional Chief Engineer, Vs. 1.K.A.Thomas,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 08/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (MD)No.888 of 2013 and Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (MD)No.889 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.2 & 2 of 2013 C.M.A.(MD) No.888/2013 1.The Regional Chief Engineer, P.W.D./W.R.O., Madurai Region, Madurai. 2.The Executive Engineer, Korampallam Aru Basin Division, W.R.O./P.W.D., Thoothukudi - 2. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Thambraparani Basin Circle, W.R.O/P.W.D., Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli - 3. ... Appellants Vs 1.K.A.Thomas, Government Engineering Contractor, Karuottuputhempura House, Palakuzha Post, Kothattakulam, Muvatttupuzha, Kerela. 2.Er.S.S.Sankara Narayanan, M.E.M.I.E., Sole Arbitrator, Sole Arbitral Tribunal, Superintending Engineer, W.R.O./P.W.D., Parambikulam Aliyar Basin Circle, Pollachi. ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 37(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
R.V.Thamizh Mani Vs. Tn Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29.08.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM W.P. No.4875 of 2010 R.V.Thamizh Mani ... petitioner Vs The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd., (Special Recovery Branch,) 692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 35. Rep. by its Branch Manager ... Respondent Prayer:-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of respondent in TIIC/SRB/MR/2009-10, dated 12.02.2010, and quash the same and further direct the respondent to refund the sum of Rs.10 lakhs to the petitioner. For petitioner .. Mr.K.Chandrasekaran For Respondents .. Mr.A.Ramesh Kumar ******* ORDER The petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.02.2010, passed by the respondent, by which a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- remitted by the petitioner to participate in a tender cum public auction held on 28.10.2009, was forfeited.2. The respondent conducted a tender cum auction for sal...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »