Chennai Court August 2013 Judgments
Universal Abrasives Vs. Commercial Tax Officer at Manali Assessment Ci ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 08.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.A.NO.876 OF2005M/s.Universal Abrasives, represented by its Proprietor Jaffer Sadiq 38, G.N.T.Road, Chennai 600 051. .... Appellant Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Manali Assessment Circle, Kuralagam Annexe, I Floor, Chennai 600 108. ... Respondent For Appellant : Mr.T.Pramodkumar Chopda For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Jayaprathap, Govt.Advocate Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the Order dated 25.1.2005 made in W.P.No.1600 of 2005 on the file of this Court. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by R.BANUMATHI,J.) The writ petitioner has preferred this appeal against the order dated 25.1.2005 made in W.P.No.1600 of 2005, whereby the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition holding that the revised assessment order dated 23.8.2004 is beyond the period of limitation prescribed under Section 16(1)(a) of the...
Tag this Judgment!The Project Director, Vs. 1.R.Karuppaiah,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 08/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (MD)No.650 of 2013 Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (MD)Nos.651 to 680 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 to 1 of 2013 C.M.A.(MD) No.650/2013: The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, No.83/1, SBI1t Colony Extension, Bye-pass Road, Madurai - 625 016. ... Appellant/2nd Respondent/ Beneficiary vs 1.R.Karuppaiah, S/o. Ramasami Servai, Door No.3-3-2/1A, Naicker Street, 3rd Ward, Thathampatti, Vadipatti Post, Madurai District. ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner/ Claimant 2.The District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition - National Highways) Collectorate Building, Madurai - 625 020. ... Respondent/1st Respondent/ Competent Authority Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 30.08.2012, in Ar.O.P.No.8 of 2009 of t...
Tag this Judgment!M. Ramachandran Vs. 1.The Chairman,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 8/2013 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHKUMAR and The Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.DEVADASS W.A(MD)No.850 of 2011 M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 M. Ramachandran .. Appellant Vs 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.2. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006. .. Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 1.11.2010 passed in W.P.(MD)No.1464 of 2009. !For Appellant ... Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh ^For Respondents ... Mr.S.P.Maharajan :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.) This writ appeal is preferred against the order made in W.P.(MD)No.1875 of 2011 dated 12.8.2011.2. The appellant herein filed the writ petition to quash the order of the second respondent dated 3.1.2011, and for a direction to appoint the appellant in the appropriate service, based on the marks obtained...
Tag this Judgment!L.Muthaiah Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 08 /2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN W.P.No.44980 of 2002 1.L.Muthaiah 2.L.Govindan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Deputy Registrar of Chits, Chennai North, Chennai 600 012. 3.M/s.Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Limited, T.Nagar Branch, No.107, Usman Road, 1st Floor, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records of the first respondent relating to impugned order of dismissal of the appeal filed by the petitioners against the award passed by the second respondent in ARC No.1228 of 1999 in the proceedings of the appeal vide G.O.(D)No.205, Commercial Taxes Department dated 15.07.2002, quash the same and consequently restrain the third respondent from proceeding with any recover process in respect of t...
Tag this Judgment!K.Arumugam Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 8-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.24772 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 K.Arumugam .. Petitioner. Versus 1. The Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.2. The Director, Directorate of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam Building, Chennai-108.3. The Pottaneri Nallagoundan Patty Special Town Panchyat, Mettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-02, Salem District, Rep. By its Executive Officer. .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to its proceedings in G.O.(D) No.235, MA & WS Department, dated 28.6.2011, and that of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his proceedings in Na.No.KA11270/2005/A4, dated 5.01.2008 and quash the orders dated 28.6.2011 and 5.01.2008, respectively and consequently direct the 1st respondent to settle all the pensionary benefits of the...
Tag this Judgment!Priya Sudir Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:30. 08.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. SELVAM CRIMINAL APPEAL No.58 of 2012 Priya Sudir ... Appellant Vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police, F5 Choolaimedu Police Station, Chennai. ... Respondent Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai in S.C.No.579 of 2010, dated 03.12.2011 for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment under Section 302 I.P.C. For Appellant : Mr.V.Gopinath, Senior Counsel for Mr.L.Mahendran For Respondent : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran, Addl. Public Prosecutor * * * * * JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.T. SELVAM,J.) The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, dated 03.12.2011 passed in S.C.No.579 of 2010, convicting the app...
Tag this Judgment!P.Harikrishnan, Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 08/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Review Application (MD) No.59 of 2012 and Review Application (MD) No.60 of 2012 in Writ Appeal (MD)Nos.614 & 710 of 2008 Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.59 of 2012 P.Harikrishnan, Managing Trustee, Arulmigu Eswari Padhra Kaliamman Temple, Neendakarai ".B". Village, Esanthangu, Muttom Post, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Petitioner/ Appellant/Petitioner Vs 1.The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Administration Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Isakki Thirukoil, Muppandal, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents/ Respondents/Respondents Review application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., against the common judgment, dated 27.03.2012, made in W.A.(MD).No.614 of 2008. !For petitioner ... Mr.T.R.Rajagopal Senior Counsel for M...
Tag this Judgment!Subramanian Vs. David
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.08.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU APPLICATION NO.3523 OF2007IN C.S.NO.336 OF20071.Mrs.Krishna Ponnuswamy 2.Nirmal Kumar .Applicants versus 1.K.David Anna Durai 2.Manohari Kalimuthu .Respondents This application is filed seeking for an order of attachment before judgment of the immovable property comprised in Survey No.166/4A, measuring an extent of 0.92 cents and the petrol bunk in the name of the fourth defendant and the property belonging to the sixth defendant comprised in Survey No.374/2A3C Tagore Street, Sree Nagar, described in the schedule pending disposal of the suit. For Applicants : Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondents: Mr.K.J.Rebello for D1 to D5 Mr.C.Duraipandian, for D-6 to D-9 - - - - ORDER This is an application filed by the applicants/plaintiffs under Order 38 Rule 5 read with Section 151 CPC, seeking for an attachment before judgment of the immovable property comprised in Survey No.166/4A, measuring an ex...
Tag this Judgment!G.Anbazhagan Vs. G.Manoharan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:30. 8.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S.Nos.256 of 1992 and Tr.A.S.No.478 of 1996 A.S.Nos.256 of 1992 1. G.Anbazhagan 2. P.Gunasekaran Appellants vs.1. G.Manoharan (Deceased) 2. V.Sadasivam (Deceased) 3. Malarvizhi 4. Stalin 5. Vimal 6. Palaniammal (RR3to 6 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R1 vide order dated 16.8.2012 in CMP No.450 of 2012 and RR3to 5 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R1 vide order dated 16.8.2012 made in CMP Nos.548 to 550 of 2012) 7. Sakuntala 8. Senguttuvan 9. Elangovan 10. Malar @ Selvakumari (RR7to 10 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R2 vide order dated 12.6.2013 in CMP No.10052 of 2006 in A.S.No.256/92) Respondents Appeal Suit against the judgment and decree dated 30.1.1992 in O.S.No.141 of 1989 on the file of the Sub Court, Dharmapuri. Tr.A.S.Nos.476 of 1996 1. Anbazhagan 2. Gunasekaran Appellants vs.1. Manoharan (Deceased) 2. Malarvizhi 3. Stalin 4. Vimal 5. Palaniammal (...
Tag this Judgment!V.Sathia Jacob Vs. Managing Director Twad Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 30.08.2013 Coram:- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.Raja Writ Petition Nos.6109 & 21408 of 2008 WP No.6109 of 2008:- V.Sathia Jacob ... Petitioner vs.1. The Managing Director, T.W.A.D. Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Cheppakkam, Chennai.2. The Executive Engineer, T.W.A.D. Board, Village Drinking Water Scheme, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.3. The Executive Engineer, T.W.A.D. Maintenance Division, Tuticorin.4. Contractor, M/s.Argentech, 85, Ladies College Road, Nagercoil. ... Respondents WP No.21408 of 2008:- 1. The Administrative Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.2. The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board, Village Water Supply Scheme Division, Nagerkoil, Kanyakumari Dist.3. The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board, Maintenance Divn., Tuticorin. ... Petitioners vs.1. V.Sathiya Jacob 2. The Contractor, M/s.Argentek, 85, Women College Road, Nagerkoil, Kanyakumari Dist.3. The Presiding Office...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »