Chennai Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arumairaj Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 08 /2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN W.P.No.46679 of 2002 & M.P.No.67838 of 2002 Arumairaj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of TamilNadu, Rep. by its Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai - 600 006. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, KK District. 4.The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai & Post, K.K.District. 5.The Corporate Manager, CSI Schools, KK Diocese, Nagercoil, K.K.District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent issued in G.O.Ms.No.155, School Education (D2) Department, dated 03.10.2002 and quash the same in so far as the direction to pay salary only after completing the child psychology training alone is concerned and direct the resp...
A.Lovely Rani Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 08 /2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN W.P.No.46678 of 2002 & M.P.No.67836 of 2002 A.Lovely Rani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of TamilNadu, Rep. by its Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai - 600 006. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, KK District. 4.The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai & Post, K.K.District. 5.The Corporate Manager, CSI Schools, KK Diocese, Nagercoil, K.K.District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent issued in G.O.Ms.No.155, School Education (D2) Department, dated 03.10.2002 and quash the same in so far as the direction to pay salary only after completing the child psychology training alone is concerned and direct the ...
State Represented by Vs. Anand
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN Criminal Appeal (Md.No.35 of 2010 State represented by The Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Pudukottai District [Crime No.42/2007]..Appellant versus Anand ..Respondent Prayer Appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of acquittal dated 07.10.2008 in S.C.No.115/2008 on the file of the learned Additional District cum Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Pudukottai. !For Appellant : Mr.Mayil Vahana Rajendran, APP ^For Respondent : Mr.G.Bhagavath singh :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.RAJESWARAN, J.) This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the State as against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Pudukkottai in S.C.No.115 of 2008 dated 07.10.2008. 2.The respondent/accused was ...
Vimaldoss Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated ::29. .08..2013 Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Selvam Criminal Appeal No:341. of 2011 Vimaldoss 158, J.J.Nagar Ennore Chennai 57. ... Appellant -vs- State represented by The Inspector of Police Ennore Police Station Thiruvallur District. ... Respondent .. .. .. Criminal Appeal under Section 391 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment and sentence passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No:4. Ponneri, in S.C. No:183. of 2009 dated 04.05.2011. For appellant :: M/s. R. Sankarasubbu For respondent :: Mr. V.M.R. Rajendran Addl. Public Prosecutor .. .. .. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.T. Selvam, J.) The appellant is the sole accused who stood trial for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. in S.C. No:183. of 2009 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No:4. Ponneri.2. The prosecution case is that the appel...
Management of the Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer of Ind ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.Nos.449 & 36529 of 2003 The Management of The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd., Administrative Office, Salem Road, Kathaparai, Karur 639 006.Petitioner in W.P.No.449 of 2003 Vs 1.The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. 2.E.Ravi 3.S.Soundararajan 4.T.Sunder 5.G.Shankar 6.S.Manjunathan 7.P.Muralidharan .Respondents in W.P.No.449 of 2003 1.E.Ravi 2.S.Soundararajan 3.T.Sunder 4.G.Shankar 5.S.Manjunathan .Petitioners in W.P.No.36529/03 versus 1.The Chairman, Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd., Karur, Karur District. 2.The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Chennai.Respondents in W.P.No.36529/03 Prayer in W.P.No.449 of 2003:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the fiRs.respondent in I.D.Nos.74/86, 78/86, 86/86, 1/87. 9/87 and 14/87 and quash its common award dated...
R.Murugavel Vs. Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 08.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.20391 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 R.Murugavel ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police (Traffic) Coimbatore City, Coimbatore. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned suspension order of the 2nd respondent in Memo No.CPO:181/2012/C.No.F1/6552/2013 dated 13.02.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in the service. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Shivasurya For Respondents : Mr.V.Subbiah, Spl.Govt.Pleader ORDER The petitioner was appointed as Grade I Constable in the Police Department. He was promoted as Special Sub-Inspector of Police and posted at B3 Traffic Kattur Police Station, Coimbatore City.2. ...
Balakrishnan Vs. T.K.Rajendran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CONT.P.No.932 of 2012 and Sub.Appln.Nos.191,301 and 302 of 2012 Balakrishnan ... petitioner Versus 1.T.K.Rajendran Director Vigilance and Anticorruption 2.K.P.Maghendran Ex-Director Vigilance and Anticorruption Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for disobeying the orders of this court dated 27.08.2010 made in Crl.O.P.No.10255/2010. For Petitioner : Mr.Abudukumar Rajarathnam for Mr.S.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Somayaji, AGP For Intervenor : Mr.P.S.Raman Senior Counsel for Mr.V.Kuberan for Rank Associates ******* ORDER This petition seeks an order of this court punishing the respondents for contempt of its order passed in Crl.O.P. No.10255/2010 on 27.08.2010.2. In Crl.O.P.No.10255/2010 the petitioner had sought that a direction be issued to the Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai, towards registration of a...
B.Narasimhulu Chetty Vs. K.Vijayalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 08.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal No.439 of 2012 & M.P.No.1 of 2012 1.B.Narasimhulu Chetty 2.C.S.Hemalatha 3.V.B.Vijayalakshmi 4.B.Santhoshkumar ... Appellants Vs. 1.K.Vijayalakshmi 2.G.Malluram Misser 3.Madhu Devi ... Respondents Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 13.08.2012 passed in Application No.1343 of 2011 in C.S.No.758 of 2010. For appellants : Mr.P.G.Padmanabhan For 1st respondent : Mr.N.Baskaran For 2nd respondent: Mr.H.Adaikala Arokiaraj JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) The appellants, being aggrieved against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in the impleading application in Application No.1343 of 2011 in C.S.No.758 of 2010 filed by them, have come forward with this Original Side Appeal.2. Facts i...
Rajamanickam Vs. R.Udayakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.08.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2740 of 2003 and Cross Obj.No.29 of 2005 and C.M.P.No.2825 of 2004 C.M.A.No.2740 of 2003 1.Rajamanickam 2.Rathamani .Appellants vs 1.R.Udayakumar 2.A.P.Abdul Hameed 3.The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., 1858, South Main Road, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.Respondents (No Notice to be sent to 1st Respondent since he is exparte before the Tribunal) Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award of the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.IV) Erode at Bhavani in M.C.O.P.No.245 of 2002, dated 31.01.2003. For Appellants : Mr.A.K.Kumaraswamy For Respondents:Mr.R.Babu (for R2) Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan (for R3) R1 Notice dispensed with Cross Objection No.29 of 2005 A.P.Abdul Hameed .Cross Objector Vs 1.Rajamanickam 2.Rathamani 3.Udayakumar 4.The Oriental Ins. Co.Ltd., 1858, South Main Road, Thanjavur, Thanjavur Dist.Re...
New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Cor ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 08.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.346 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 The New India Assurance Company Limited, Thiruvannamalai. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, By its Managing Director, Villupuram. 2.Chandra Devi Durga. ... Respondents (second respondent exparte in lower Court and hence notice may be dispensed with) PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.98 of 2007, dated 15.02.2008, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Chidambaram. For Appellant : Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan For Respondents : Mr.V.RAmesh for R-1 R-2 (exparte) - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.98 of 2007, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Chidambaram.2....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »