Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D.Geetha Vs. Kavarai Nadidumargal Mahajana Sangam at Tiruchengode
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :3. 04.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.Nos.1419 & 1420 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 D.Geetha .. Appellant in both the appeals Vs. Kavarai Nadidumargal Mahajana Sangam Tiruchengode, rep.by its President V.Govindasamy, 30,S.V.A.Extension Street No.2, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District .. Respondent in both the appeals These Second Appeals are focussed as against the judgments and decrees dated 28.11.2008 passed by the Sub-Court, Thiruchengode in A.S.Nos.103 & 104 of 2008 (A.S.Nos.6 & 7 of 2007, Sub Court, Namakkal), confirming the judgments and decrees dated 28.11.2008 passed by the District Munsif, Tiruchengode, in O.S.No.132 of 1999. For Appellant : Mr.N.Manokaran in both the appeals For Respondents : Mr.M.Devaraj in both the appeals COMMON JUDGMENT These Second appeals are focussed by the plaintiff animadverting upon the judgments and decrees dated 28.11.2008 passed by the Sub-Court, Thiruchengode in A.S.N...
1. the State of Tamilnadu, Rep. Vs. 1. M.Arumugam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.A.(MD) No.204 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 o1. The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government Environment of Forest Secretariat, Chennai-9.2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests 15, Jeenis Road, Panagal Building Saidapet, Chennai-15.3. The District Forest Officer Social Forestry Division Trichy.4. The District Forest Officer Theni Forest Division Theni. .. Appellants versus 1. M.Arumugam 2. A.Annamalai 3. P.Jeyaraman 4. A.Andi 5. M.Velu 6. L.Munusamy 7. A.Karuppiah 8. M.C.Mathew @ Babu 9. V.Govindan 10. T.C.George Kutty @ Benny 11. C.Subburaj 12. P.Kottaichamy 13. B.Selvakumaran 14. L.Ponnalagar 15. A.Shankar 16. D.Murugan .. Respondents !For appellant ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader ^For respondents-1 to 16 ... Mr.R.Singgaravelan ----- :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.VIMALA,J.) T...
1.Hajee E.A.A.Jalaludeen Vs. E.A.A.Mohameed Siddiq
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.675 of 2011 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.676 of 2011 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.675 of 2011:1. Hajee E.A.A.Jalaludeen 2.E.A.A.Jameemdeen 3.A.Nazeerz Beevi 4.A.Z.Mohammed Harish 5.K.Saleema Begum 6.A.Z.Mohameed Harun 7.S.Mehar Nisha ... Petitioners/Petitioners/ 1,2,4 to 8 Defendants Vs E.A.A.Mohameed Siddiq ... Respondent/Respondent/ Palintiff Prayer Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 16.03.2011 in I.A.No.111 of 2011 in O.S.No.7 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Court/ Fast Track Court, Periyakulam. C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.676 of 2011:1. Hajee E.A.A.Jalaludeen 2.E.A.A.Jameemdeen 3.A.Nazeerz Beevi 4.A.Z.Mohammed Harish 5.K.Saleema Begum 6.A.Z.Mohameed Harun 7.S.Mehar Nisha ... Petitioners/Petitioners/ 1,2,4 to 8 Defendants Vs E.A.A.Mohame...
K.Rajendran... Petit Vs. M. Natarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No345 of 2012 & M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 K.Rajendran ... Petitioner/Appellant/ Respondent/Tenant Vs M. Natarajan ... Respondent/Respondent/ Petitioner/Landlord Prayer Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, to set aside the order dated 31.10.2011 made in R.C.A.No.57 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Rent Control Appellate Authority, Madurai, confirming the order dated 03.06.2010 made in R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court(Rent Controller) Thirumangalam. !For Petitioner ... Mr.G.R.Swaminathan ^For Respondent ... Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan :ORDER The tenant is the revision petitioner. The respondent filed R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court( Rent Controller) Thirumangalam, for eviction of the revision petitioner on the groun...
Ex. Gunner (Operator) T. Suresh, Vs. the Chief of Army Staff New Delhi ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
V. Periya Karuppiah, J. 1. This application has been filed by the applicant before the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench at New Delhi in O.A.No. 303 of 2011 and was transferred to this Bench. The applicant has filed this application for quashing the impugned punishment of dismissal awarded to him on 21.03.2006 and quash the impugned cryptic rejection order of the Chief of Army Staff dated 11.05.2009 with all consequential benefits to the applicant and also for costs. 2. The case of the applicant as stated in the application would be as follows:- The applicant was enrolled in the Indian Army on 30.01.1999 and was given rigorous basic military training. He was attested as a Gunner and posted to various units in Raiwala, U.P.; Dawan, JandK; Punjab etc. While in service the applicant was granted part of annual leave of 30 days from 06.09.2005 to 05.10.2005. The applicant over stayed for 10 days beyond his leave period due to sickness in the family. When the applicant reported back on ...
P.Ragu Vs. 1. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P.(MD) No.4949 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 P.Ragu .. Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector Kanyakumari District Nagercoil.2. The Superintendent of Police Kanyakumari District Nagercoil.3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Padmanabapuram Revenue Division Thuckalay Kanyakumari District.4. The Tahsildar Vilavancode Taluk Kanyakumari District.5. The Inspector of Police Nithiravilai Police Station Kanyakumari District.6. S.Dilli 7. Renuka 8. Vasantha 9. Radha 10. Sinthamoni 11. Murugan 12. Rengan 13. Suresh 14. Rajkumar 15. Vijayakumar 16. Satheesh .. Respondents ----- PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the fourth respondent's impugned order in A2/16136/2003 dated 15.07.2008 and quash the same as illegal...
R.Uma Maheswaran Vs. 1.The Commissioner,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Writ Petition (MD)No.11722 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 R.Uma Maheswaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 2.The Commissioner, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarifiled mandamus, calling for the records in pursuance of the 2nd respondent's rejection order in Na.Ka.No.79/2012/B1, dated 11.01.2012, quashing the same as devoid of merits and consequently directing the respondents to regularise the petitioner's service from August, 2002 in time scale of pay and to confer all the benefits within a stipulated period. !For Petitioner ... Mr.A.Haja Mohideen ^For Respondent-1... Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, Spl.Govt.Pleader. For Responde...
Ponnammal, W/O.V.Moni Vs. 1.The Director of School Education,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Writ Petition (MD)No.4170 of 2011 and Writ Petition (MD)No.4171 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1/2012 and 1/2013 in WP(MD)Nos.4170 & 4171 of 2012 Ponnammal, W/o.V.Moni ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.4170/2011 Rajam, W/o.Appukuttan ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.4171/2011 Vs. 1.The Director of School Education, High School, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 3.The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents in both the WPs Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarifiled mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 3rd respondent in Ref.Na.Ka.No.9965/A1/2005, dated 29.07.2010, quashing the same insofar as fixing the regularization with effect from 23.0...
Kris Heavy Engineering and Construction Vs. Pnhb Lanco Khec Jv
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:02. 04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA A.No.687 of 2010 M/S. KRIS HEAVY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD REP BY MR. DATO IR A.P. PERUMAL VS PNHB-LANCO-KHEC-JV REP BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY OLD NO.66 NEW NO.18 2ND STREET I FLOOR KARPAGAM AVENUE, R.A. PURAM, CHENNAI 2 CHENNAI METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD (CMWSSB) REP BY CHIEF ENGINEER ORDER M/s.Kris Heavy Engineering and Construction Sdn. Bhd., has invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act before commencement of arbitration proceedings with the prayer for interim measure in granting interim pro-order prohibiting the 2nd respondent / Garnishee from releasing the amount due and payable to the 1st respondent as on the date of this order under the contract not CNT/WSS/CWSAP-I/MWB/03/2001-Package III dated 31.10.2012.2. The application as framed is not competent. The order against Garnishee can be passed by invoking the underlying principles of ...
Nallathambi Vs. Nallusamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:2. 4.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.163 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Nallathambi (died) 1. Santha 2. Kumaresan 3. Sumathi 4. Amutha Petitioners vs. Nallusamy Respondent Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 17.11.2011 in I.A.No.656 of 2011 in O.S.No.122 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem. For petitioners: Mr.A.R.Gokulnath For respondent : Mr.P.Jagadeesan ORDER Defendants 2 to 5 in O.S.No.122 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional Judge, Sub Court, Salem are the revision petitioners.2. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,00,000/= based on the promissory note alleged to have been executed by the first defendant Nallathambi, whose legal heirs are the revision petitioners herein, for the borrowal of a sum of Rs.1,00,000/=. After commencement of the trial, the revision petitioners filed an application to send the promissory note Ex.A1, r...