Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Royal Villa Residents Association Vs. Project Management Committee
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED .04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN CRP(PD)No.3084 OF 201.and M.P.No.1 OF 201.Royal Villa Residents Association, represented by its President, Mr.P.R.Angamuthu, New No.5/2,Royal Villa, 4th Main Road, Kotturpuram, Chennai 0085. ..Petitioner/Respondent/Defendant Vs The Project Management Committee Kotturpuram Officers Co-operative Housing Society, represented by its authorised persons 1. K.Govindarajan 2. R.Dorairaj ..Respondents/Petitioners/Plaintiffs Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the exparte order, dated 01.08.2012, passed in I.A.No.10947/2012 in O.S.No.3646 of 2012, on the file of the II Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner :Mr.M.S.Krishnan Senior Counsel for M/s.K.Moorthy For Respondents :M/s.G.Rm.Palaniappan ORDER Aggrieved by the order of ad-interim ex-parte injunction, this Civil Revision Petition is filed by the...
C.Naresh Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Police of Greater Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:2-4-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Crl.O.P.No.6376 of 2013 C.Naresh Kumar .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2.Joint Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 3.Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 4.The Inspector of Police, Team-IX, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. Crime No.247 of 2009. 5.AICTE, New Delhi. 6.The Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 7.The Secretary Department of Higher Education, State of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai. 8.Anna University. Rep. By Registrar, Guindy, Chennai. .. Respondents This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent to direct the Fourth Respondent to file the report relating to the genuineness of documents of the 50 lakhs worth of immovable property security deposit give...
1.Selvi C.K.Saraswathi Vs. the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.(MD)No.5013 o1. Selvi C.K.Saraswathi 2.R.Meenakshi Sundaram 3.S.Alagirisamy 4.S.Sundararajan 5.S.Nalla Meenakshi 6.M.Anandan 7.Prof.A.Winfred 8.S.P.Rajaram 9.V.Triveni 10.A.Afthab Begum ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Secretary to Government, Finance Pension Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 009. ... Respondent Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the implementation of the order of the Government in G.O.Ms.No.371 Finance (Pension) Department dated 30.04.1986 to all the petitioners by directing the respondent to count the D.A. and A.D.A. As Dearness pay for all the 10 months proceedings retirement by computing average emoluments and pay the arrears of pension, gratuity and value of computation on such refixation computed on and from...
Vaas Automation Private Limited Vs. Authority for Clarification and Ad ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:2. 4.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.8553 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 M/s.Vaas Automation Private Limited, Represented by R.Ganesan, Vice President--Operations & Authorised Signatory, 73, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Perungudi, Chennai-96. .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Authority for Clarification and Advance Ruling, Ezhilagam, Chennai.2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC), Anna Salai II Assessment Circle, Chennai. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the files of the second respondent in CST.32201/2010-11, dated 5.3.2013 and quash the same as being without jurisdiction, as the order is contrary to Section 8(2) of the CST Act read with Entries 67-A and 89 of Part-B of the First Schedule and Section 48-A of the TNVAT Act, violative of principles of natural justice and hence, invalid and illegal. For ...
Fridgehouse Vs. G.Jaganathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:02. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN CRL. O.P. NOS. 6033 & 29237 OF 201.AND M.P. NOS. 1 & 2 OF 201.& M.P. NO. 1 OF 201.Crl. O.P. No.6033 o1. M/s.Fridgehouse rep. By Managing Partner Mr. S.Giridharan Near Vinayaga Caterers Auditorium Kadavanthara Post, Ernakula020. 2. S.Giridharan 3. S.Gauthaman 4. C.Ganesh 5. T.Raghavan 6. S.Meerabai 7. S.Murali 8. C.Natesan .. Petitioners - Vs - G.Jaganathan .. Respondent Crl. O.P. No.29237 of 2012 G.Jaganathan .. Petitioner - Vs - 1. M/s.Fridgehouse rep. By Managing Partner Mr. S.Giridharan Near Vinayaga Caterers Auditorium Kadavanthara Post, Ernakula020. 2. S.Giridharan 3. S.Gauthaman 4. C.Ganesh 5. T.Raghavan 6. S.Meerabai 7. S.Murali .. Respondents Crl. O.P. No.6033/2012 filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C. No.41 of 2012 from the file of the Judicial Magistrate not VI, Coimbatore a...
Tmt.S.Beulah M.Rajeswari Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.(MD)No.5045 of 2013 Tmt.S.Beulah M.Rajeswari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Secretary to Government, Backward classes, Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare (B.C.III) Department, Fort St,. George, Chennai 009. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By The Principal Secretary to government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 009. 3.The Commissioner of Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities, Chepauk, Chennai 005. 4.The Joint Director, Kallar Reclamation, Madura020. 5.The Headmaster, Government Kallar Higher Secondary School, Melakkal, Vadipatti taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend to the petitioner the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.258 School Education (M.1) Department dated 06.09....
Alladi Staram Vs. Plfinance and Investment Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:2. 4.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.2343 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Alladi Staram Petitioner vs.1. M/s.P.L.Finance and Investment & Limited, No.4, 2nd Link Road, CIT Colony, Mylapore, Chenna004. rep by its Director Mr.M.Narayanamurthy.2. M/s.Premier Housing and Industrial Enterprises Ltd., No.4, 2nd Link Road, CIT Colony, Mylapore, Chenna004. rep by its Director M.Narayanamurthy 3. Mrs.Geetha Ravishankar 4. P.A.Kothandarama Chetty 5. Kamal Kasan 6. Alladi Prabhahar 7. Mrs.Lalitha Ramakrishnan 8. Dr.Krishnasamy Alladi (RR 5 to 8 were given up in CRP) Respondents Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 20.2.2012 in I.A.No.10633 of 2011 in O.S.No.14314 of 2010 on the file of the V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For petitioner : Mr.D.Govinda Reddy For respondents: Mr.T.V.Ramanujam for Mr.R.Venkatavaradhan ORDER Fifth respondent/fifth proposed defendant in I.A.No.10633 of 2011 in O.S.N...
K.Baladhandayudam Vs. P.S.R.Sathiyamurthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:02. 04.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P(PD)No.3861 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 K.Baladhandayudam : Petitioner/ Defendant Vs. P.S.R.Sathiyamurthy : Respondent/ Plaintiff PRAYER:This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order, dated 27.09.2012 in I.A.No.325 of 2012 in O.S.No.52 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Panruti. For Petitioner : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Senior counsel for Mrs.A.L.Gandhimathi For Respondent : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy O R D E R The defendant in O.S.No.52 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti, is the revision petitioner. 2.The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for declaration of title and for permanent injunction stating that the property originally belonged to one Rajmohan and Rajmohan sold the property to the plaintiff under a registered sale deed, dated 04.11.2010 and ever-since the date of purchase, the resp...
Banumathi Vs. M.Vasantha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02. 04.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.1344 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.828 o1. Banumathi 2. Punithavathi 3. Anbuselvi 4. Hemalatha 5. Arulmozhi .. Appellants Vs.1. M.Vasantha 2. Senthilkumar (died) 3. Chinnammal 4. Rajeswari 5. Nagarajan 6. Kanimozhi 7. S.Poongodi 8. Minor Ramalingam 9. Minor Praveen Rajkumar .. Respondents Minors 8 and 9 represented by their mother and next friend S.Poongodi R3 recorded as LR of the deceased R2 and RR7 to 9 brought on record as Lrs of the deceased R2 vide order of court dated 15.02.2013 made in C.M.P.No.829 of 2012 in S.A.No. 1344 of 2004. This second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 31.12.2003 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Sankari in A.S.No.64 of 1998 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.06.1998 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sankari in O.S.No.23 of 1996. For appellants : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.N.Sankaravadivel for...
M.Somasundaram Vs. 1.The Principal Chief Conservator
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.(MD)No.5053 of 2013 M.somasundaram ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chenna015. 2.The Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry Division, 11, Lady Doak College Road, Madura002. ... Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to revise and refix the petitioner's pay in the Selection Grade Time scale of pay in the post of Ranger with effect from 21.02.1991 I.e. on the date of petitioner's promotion as Ranger, as his Special Grade Time scale of pay of the lower post of Forester is identical to that of Ordinary Grade promotion post of Ranger and revise the pension proposals within a stipulated period. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Alagarsamy ^for Respondents... Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, A.G.P :ORDER The petitioner joi...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »