Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Rama Rao Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.8029 of 2005 S.Rama Rao .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Information & Tourism Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.The Director, Information & Public Relations, Secretariat, Chennai 9. 3.G.Mohan 4.G.Babu .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus as stated therein. For Petitioner : Ms.AL.Ganthimathi For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.V.Duraisolaimalai, AGP For R3 & R4 : No Appearance ORDER The petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider his representations dated 25.02.2005 and 26.02.2005 and to appoint him as Chief Cameraman in Tamil Nadu Films Division. Heard the parties.2. The petitioner was appointed as News Reel Cameraman on 26.08.1988 in the Tamil Nadu Films Division under Rule 10(a)(1) o...
L and T Finance Limited Vs. C.T.Ramanathan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA A.No.5314 of 2012 M/S. L & T FINANCE LIMITED REP BY ITS ASST MANAGER MR C BALASUBRAMANIAN vs C.T. RAMANATHAN INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD FLAT NO.4/3 II FLOOR SK ENCLAVE 4 NEW NO.4 SNOWROJI ROAD CHETPET CHENNAI 3 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER SOUTHERN RAILWAYS ERNAKULAM GENERAL MANAGER (ACCOUNTS) SOUTHERN RAILWAYS CONTRACT CHENNAI 3 ORDER This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Sec.9(ii)(a),(b) (c) & (e) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the applicant, for issuance of prohibitory order restraining the Garnishees from making the payment upto a limit of Rs.2,73,11,000/- (Rupees two crores seventy three lakhs and eleven thousand only) and consequently, direct the Garnishees to deposit the amount so withheld into this Court, pending enforcement of the award that may ultimately be passed by the sole Arbitrator. 2 The applicant is a ...
The Management, Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Workmen's Compensation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01/04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.1682 of 2010 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012 The Management, Ashok Sizing, Chettiarpatti Village, Mugavoor, Virudhunagar District. .. Appellant vs 1.The Commissioner of Workmen's Compensation Authority under the Workmen's Compensation Act, No.142/1, Sundaram Theatre Road, K.K.Nagar, Madurai 020. 2.Tmt.Selvarani 3.Minor.Karthik 4.Minor.Pugazhal (Minor respondent 2nd and 3rd represented by 2nd respondent mother and nature of guardian) 5.A.S.P.G.Ramasamy .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the order dated 12.10.2010, passed in W.C.No.249 of 2006, on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour for Workmen's Compensation, Madurai, received by the appellant on 18.11.2010. !For Appellant ... Mr.Karthik for M/s.Profexs Associates ^For Respondent ... Court for R1 Mr.T.R.Jeyapalam for R2 to R4 :JUDGMENT The r...
N.Pasupathy Vs. A.M.Sekar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01.04.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.348 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 N.Pasupathy .. Appellant Vs. A.M.Sekar .. Respondent This second appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2011 passed by the learned V Additional Judge (In charge, IV Additional Court), City Civil Court, Chennai in A.S.No.160 of 2007 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.10.2006 passed by the learned VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.3214 of 2004. For Appellant : Mr.A.Chenchurama Reddy For Respondent : Mr.T.Viswanatha Rao Caveator(T/E) This second appeal is focussed by the original defendant, animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2011 passed by the learned V Additional Judge, (In charge, IV Additional Court), City Civil Court, Chennai in A.S.No.160 of 2007 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.10.2006 passed by the learned VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court...
1.M.Daniel Selvaraj Vs. 1.V.Sakthivel
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01/04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.163 o1. M.Daniel Selvaraj 2.Ebenezer Moses 3.Blessing Anusha (2nd and 3rd petitioners are minors, rep. by their maternal uncle who is petitioner) .. Appellants vs 1.V.Sakthivel 2.O.Veeramani 3.The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Tirunelveli. .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and Decree dated 30.09.2002, passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.112 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. !For Appellant ... Mr.T.Arul ^ :JUDGMENT The appellants/claimants had filed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.112 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil and claimed compensation of a sum of Rs.10,99,500/- with interest against the respondents herein stating...
Bagavathiappan Pillai Vs. 1.State by Inspector of Police2.Jebaselvakum ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Crl.OP(MD)No.17898 of 2012 Bagavathiappan Pillai ... Petitioner Vs 1.State by Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District 2.Jebaselvakumar ... Respondents Prayer This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records relating to Cr.No.10/2012 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police and quash the same. !For Petitioner ... Mr.Shanmugasundarsm, SC ^For Respondent ... Mrs.S.Prabha, GA-R1 Mr.A.Dennison-R2 :ORDER This petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings pending on the file of the 1st Respondent Police in Cr.No.10/2012 for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.2. The short facts giving rise to this petition are stated below:- The Petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Engineer on 12.02.1979 in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. He was promoted to various cadres...
S.Veerabadran Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 01 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN W.P. No.7627 of 2006 S.Veerabadran ... Petitioner versus 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by School Education Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai-9 2. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6 3. The Chief Educational Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore 4. The District Educational Officer, Tirupur, Coimbatore District ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent issued in MM. No.22559/T3(4)/05 dated 24.03.2005 and quash the same and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to count the service rendered by the petitioner as Physical Education Teacher in recognised Metro Matriculation School, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District for the purpose of pay fixation and pension and other benefits. (Prayer amended as p...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Minor.Marikannu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01/04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.467 of 2010 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2010 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Micro Office TN-5719, Seethaiammal Complex, Sathiyamoorthi Road, Pudukottai Town. .. Appellants vs 1.Minor.Marikannu (Minor 1st respondent represented by his father and natural guardian Thiru.A.Karunanithi) 2.Mr.C.Sakthivel .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and Decree dated 17.11.2009, passed in M.C.O.P.No.232 of 2009, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court, Pudukottai. ?For Appellant ... Mr.C.Jawahar Ravindran ^For Respondent ... Mr.K.Gokul for R1 No Appearance for R2 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD).No.467 of 2010, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.232 of 2009, on the file of the Motor Accid...
Syed Saliha Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 04.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. SUDANTHIRAM Criminal Appeal No. 960 of 2004 Syed Saliha .. Appellant Versus The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Dharmapuri .. Respondent Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 14.07.2004 passed in C.C. No. 1 of 1999 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate not I, Krishnagiri (Special Charge). For Appellant : Mr. John Sathyan For Respondent : Mr. P. Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor JUDGMENT The appellant is the accused in C.C. No. 1 of 1999 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate not I, Krishnagiri. He stood convicted for the offences punishable under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment for each of the offence and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three mon...
State Vs. Meeran Bai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 04-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU CRL.RC.No.437 of 2013 State represented by The Inspector of Police 'Q' Branch CID, Nagapattinam .. Petitioner Versus 1.Meeran Bai @ Syed Rahamullah @ Syed Rahamullah Meeran 2.Atha Ullah Patcha 3.Syed Ameenudeen 4.Sathik @ Mohamed Sathik .. Respondents Revision filed u/s.397 and r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvarur in CMP No.1792 of 2013 dated 22.03.2013 dated 22.03.2013. For Petitioner : Mr.Mohamed Riyaz Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER Heard the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the petitioner.2. In the application filed by the revision petitioner before the court below, it is stated that on 04.06.2012, the Sub-Inspector of Police, 'Q' Branch appeared before the police station and filed a special report alongwith complaint stating that a case was registered against the accused in Crime No.2 of 2012 under sections 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »