Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
1.M.Govindarajan Vs. 1.R.Ganesamoorthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04/04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.554 of 2013 & M.P(MD)No.1 o1. M.Govindarajan 2.G.Mangayarkarasi 3.G.Maniselvam 4.G.Mathivanan 5.Mallika 6.Manivizhi 7.Malarvizhi ... Petitioners/Respondents 1 to 7/ Defendants 1 to 7 Vs 1.R.Ganesamoorthy ... Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff 2.Sebastin ... Respondent/8th Respondent/ 8th Defendant Prayer Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the order dated 19.12.2012 made in I.A.No.192 of 2012 in O.S.No.167 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thiruchirappalli and set aside the same and allow the civil revision petition. !For Petitioners... Mr.D.Rajkumar ^For Respondents... Mr.M.subash Babu for R1 No Appearance for R2 :ORDER The defendants in O.S.No.167 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, are the revision petitioners. The first responde...
Omana George Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.14085 of 2007 and M.P.No.1/2007 and 1/2010 Tmt.Omana George .. Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax and Competent Authority of Urban Land Ceiling Tambaram Area, No.169, Sannadhi Street, Adambakkam Chennai-602. The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai-603. The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk At Tambaram, Chennai-600 045 .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the connected records of the 1st Respondent relating to his order in proceedings Na.Ka.4524/90 (P) dt.11-1-91 (certified copy issued on 23-3-2007) U/S 9(5) of the Principal Act, declaring as excess vacant land in Survey No.269/1A & 2 of Thiruneermalai Vilalge, Old Saidapet Taluk, present Tambaram Taluk, measuring to an extent of 7150 Sq. Mts. Inclusive of 94 = cents...
V.Kalyani Vs. Official Liquidator
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04. 04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA Comp.A.Nos.351 to 377 of 2013 in C.P.No.186 of 2004 COMP.A.351/2013 --------------- V.KALYANI W/O.VEERARAGHAVAN NO.5 THIRUNEERMALAI MAIN ROAD, NAGALKENI, CHROMPET, CHENNAI.44 VS THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS AS LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. COROMANDEL LEATHER PVT. LTD. (IN LIQN.) ORDER In all these applications, the prayer is to condone the delay in filing claim application in Form-66 to claim the amount due to the workmen under Award passed by the learned Labour Court.2. In support of these applications, it is pleaded that industrial dispute challenging the suspension of operation of industrial concern by the management was referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Chennai, wherein an ex parte Award was passed on 19.11.2004, holding the "Suspension of Operation" to be illegal and that the workmen working in the industry were entitled to wages for the entire p...
R.Ayyamperumal Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.A.(MD)No.1147 of 2012 R.Ayyamperumal .. Appellant Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Chennai-9. 2.The Public Information Officer & Inspector General of Police (Establishment), Office of the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai-1. .. Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1248 of 2011 dated 30.11.2011. !For Appellant ... Mr.H.Thayumanaswamy ^For Respondents... Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) The present writ appeal is against the order of the learned single Judge in W.P.(MD)No.1248 of 2011 dated 30.11.2011, dismissing...
Krishnamurthy Vs. 1.Karthikeyan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.1248 of 2005 Krishnamurthy .. Appellant vs 1.Karthikeyan 2.The Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, South Street, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and Decree dated 13.03.2003, passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.33 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court not I, Thanjavur. !For Appellant ... Mr.D.Veerasekaran ^For Respondent ... Mr.K.Baskaran for R2 :JUDGMENT The appellant herein/claimant was travelling as a pillion rider on 14.05.1999, the motorcycle bearing registration not TN-49C- 5579 and at about 12.00 midnight, on the Kallaperumbur Road at that point of time, the rider of the motor cycle had ridden the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and as the road was slippery as rain was ...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Neethi Kesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04/04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.112 of 2008 The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, 1817, Neela South Street, Nagapattinam Town. .. Appellant vs 1.Neethi Kesan 2.Balan 3.The Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 1858, South main Veedhi, Thanjavur. 4.Karunanidhi .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and Decree dated 15.11.2006, passed in M.C.O.P.No.150 of 2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Pattukottai. !For Appellant ... Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan ^For Respondent ... Mr.G.Karnan for R1 Mr.K.Bhaskaran for R3 Mr.A.Chandra kumar for R4 :JUDGMENT The appellant/4th respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD).No.112 of 2008, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.150 of 2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinat...
Jayalakshmi Vs. Padmavathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:4.04.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL C.R.P.PD.No.1213 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Jaya @ Jayalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. Padma @ Padmavathi ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decretal Order dated 13.12.2010 made in I.A.No.448 of 2010 in O.S.No.25 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kalyanaraman For Respondent : No appearance ORDER The Petitioner/Defendant has filed the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 13.12.2010 in I.A.No.448 of 2010 in O.S.No.25 of 2009 passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Namakkal. 2.The Learned Principal District Judge, Namakkal in I.A.No.448 of 2010 in O.S.No.25 of 2009 on 13.12.2010 [filed by the Petitioner/ Defendant under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the exparte decree passed against her on 07.10.2010] has directe...
Athiappan Vs. Palaniappan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:4.04.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL C.R.P.PD.No.2640 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 o1. Athiappan 2.Rangasamy Gounder 3.Ramasamy Gounder 4.Dhamodaran ... Petitioners/Petitioners/Plaintiffs Vs. 1.Palaniappan 2.K.P.Periyasamy 3.K.Varudharajan 4.Balasubramani 5.Jayakrishnan 6.Sengottuvel 7.Sakthivel ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decretal Order dated 29.11.2010 made in I.A.No.962 of 2010 in O.S.No.145 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Rasipuram. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.K.Vasuvenkat ORDER The Petitioners/Plaintiffs have focussed the present Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 29.11.2010 in I.A.No.962 of 2010 in O.S.No.145 of 2008 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Rasipuram. 2.The Learned District Munsif, while passing the order in I.A.No.962 of 2010 in O.S.No.145 of 200...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Jambulingam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04/04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.1080 of 2011 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, 33,Promenade Road, Cantonment, Trichy - 1. .. Appellant vs 1.Jambulingam 2.Parvathy 3.Panneerselvam 4.A.Ondimuthu .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and Decree dated 30.04.2008, passed in M.C.O.P.No.194 of 1996, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Kulithalai. !For Appellant ... Mr.R.Srinivasan ^For Respondent ... Mr.K.P.Narayana Kumar for R1 to R3 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD).No.1080 of 2011, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.194 of 1996, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Kulithalai.2. The petitioners, who are the parents and brother of the (deceased) Gopi, have filed the claim ...
Maji Vs. Perumal Naidu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 04.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.1255 of 1989 Maji .. Appellant vs.1. Perumal Naidu (deceased) 2. P.Radhabai 3. P.Jankrishnan 4. P.Gopalakrishnan 5. J.Saraswathi 6. Mangalakshmi 7. Sumathi 8. Geetha 9. Devi .. Respondents RR2 to 9 brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole respondent vide order of this Court dated 10.12.2011. This Second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree of the Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, S.Arcot in A.S.No.1 of 1989 and dated 11th July 1989 in confirming the judgments modifying the decree of the Court of District Munsif, Cuddalore in O.S.No.701 of 1985 and dated 28.11.1988 by allowing the cross objection preferred in A.S.No.1 of 1989 on the file of the Sub Court, Cuddalore. For Appellant : Mr.V.Raghavachari For R2 : Mr.R.Muralidharan JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 11th July 1989 passed in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »