Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Golden Sun Industries Unit 2. Vs. Tamilnadu Electricity Regulatory Com ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Writ Petition No.15223 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in his impugned demand Notice No.SE/EEDC/ED/DFC/AO/REV/HT/A2/F.HT SC NO.168/D.2022/12 Dated 26.5.2012 and quash the same for the levy of excess charges/penalty for alleged excess demand and energy quota as illegal arbitrary without authority of law and against the order of the 1st respondent made in Suo Motu Proceedings No.1 of 2009 dated 28.10.2009 D.R.P.No.14 of 2010 dated 14.3.2011 and R.P.No.3 & 4 of 2011 in D.R.P.No.13 and 14 of 2010 dated 15.11.2011.Writ Petition No.15224 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in his impugned demand Notice No.SE/EEDC/ED/DFC/AO/REV/HT/A2/F.HT SC NO.272/D.1072/12 Dated 23.4.2012 and quash the same for the levy of excess charges/penalty for alleged excess demand and energy quota...
Mrs.S. Saraswathi. Vs. the Commissioner and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling of the records in impugned order in Na. Ka.No.04421/2009/Pa.A.2, dated 15.12.2011 signed on 16.12.2011 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unjustifiable in law.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned.2. It has been stated that the petitioner was employed, as an Assistant Engineer, under the St.Thomas Mount Panchayat Union. While so, the petitioner had been transferred to Madhurandhagam Panchayat Union, by way of the impugned proceedings of the second respondent, dated 15.12.2011, in the place of one V.Jagannathan. In the said impugned proceedings, the second respondent has mentioned that the transfer of the petitioner had been effected, based on the request made by the said Jagannathan. However, in the counter affidavit filed by the second respondent, it has been stated that the ...
S.Jayalakshmi. Vs. Additional Assistant Elementary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for the records connected with the orders of the respondent in RC.593/Aa1/2001 dated 15.4.2002 and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to restore the orders in No.593/Aa1/2001 dated 27.04.2001 insofar as the petitioner is concerned.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order RC.593/Aa1/2001 dated 15.04.2002, in ordering recovery of increment granted to the petitioner for acquiring higher qualification.2. The petitioner joined as Secondary Grade Assistant on 12.12.1990, in the Panchayat Union Elementary School, Pallipandalam (Urudu) in Sankarapuram Panchayat Union. The petitioner acquired the qualification of M.A. Degree from Annamalai Open University in 1994-1995 and B.Ed. degree in 1995-1996. The petitioner was granted four advance increments two ea...
Ms.R.B.Wovens (P) Ltd. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Writ Petition in W.P.No.19498 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in the impugned clarification letter No. FC/Rev/AO/Esst/Asst/Rev/D.120/11 dated 22.2.2012 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents 2 to 5 to permit adjustment of surplus wind energy from higher slots to lower slots both in current generations/banking for consumption in HT No.178 and pass such other including refund if paid due to non adjustment.Writ Petition in W.P.No.19499 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in the impugned clarification letter No. FC/Rev/AO/Esst/Asst/Rev/D.120/11 dated 22.2.2012 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents 2 to 5 to permit adjustment of surplus wind energy from higher slots to lower slots both in current generati...
A.Goutamchand. Vs. S.Krishnaveni
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
This civil revision petition is preferred under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18/1960 as amended by Act 23/1973 as against the fair and decreetal orders dated 25.06.2012 passed by the learned VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in M.P.No.174 of 2011 in the unnumbered RCA in SR No.12414 of 2011.ORDER1. This civil revision petition is focussed as against the fair and decreetal orders dated 25.06.2012 passed by the learned VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in M.P.No.174 of 2011 in the unnumbered RCA in SR No.12414 of 2011.2. Heard both sides.3. Pithily and precisely, the germane facts, absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition would run thus:a) Being aggrieved by the order of the Rent Controller in fixing the fair rent, the tenant filed an appeal with a delay of 260 days on the ground that he was suffering from ill-health, in view of he having met with an accident earlier. Whereupon, after hearing both s...
D.Mohan. Vs. the Chief Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent dated 12.06.2001 issued in the Ref.no.Memo.No.S.4(3)/85881/99 and quash the same and further direct the respondent to absorb the petitioner as work inspector/work clerk with effect from 1.1.83 and to award the consequential benefits.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order Memo.No.S.4(3)/85881/99 dated 12.06.2001, declining the request of petitioner for appointment after relaxing of the rules.2. The petitioner was appointed as Man Mazdoor on daily wage basis in the respondent department. The petitioner was promoted as Head Mazdoor on daily wage basis in the year 1984. The recommendations were made by the Superintending Engineer, Madurai Circle for absorbing the petitioner as Work Clerk, but instead of absorbing t...
C.M.Marisamy GowdA. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Letter No.7120/A.0.3/2009-10 Public (Political Pension-3) Department dated 30.09.2010 and quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondents to grant State Freedom Fighters Pension to the petitioner from the date of his application with interest.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying that this Court may be pleased to set aside the proceedings of the first respondent, dated 30.09.2010, and to, consequently, direct the respondents to grant State Freedom Fighters Pension, to the petitioner, from the date of his application, along with interest.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.3. The petitioner has stated that he was a Freedom Fighter who had taken part in the 'Quit India Movement', i...
S. Jeyalakshmi. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the third respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his Proc.Na.Ka.No.15337/A.Na.3/2011, dated 20.2.2012 and quash the same and direct the respondents to relieve the petitioner from service on voluntary retirement with effect from the afternoon of 31.3.2012 with all monetary and service benefits as per the Fundamental Rules and Government Orders.O R D E R1. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order of the third respondent dated 20.2.2012, rejecting the request of the petitioner for voluntary retirement and to direct the respondents to relieve the petitioner from service with effect from the afternoon of 31.3.2012 with all monetary and service benefits as per the Fundamental Rules and Government Orders.2. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the writ petition are as follows...
The Management Park Town Co-operative Whole Stores Ltd. Vs. G.Achuthan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned award dated 25.06.2007 passed by the second respondent in C.P.No.135 of 2005.O R D E R1. The Management of Park Town Co-operative Whole Stores Ltd. has approached this Court with the prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned award passed by the II Additional Labour Court, Chennai on a petition filed under Sec.33(c) (2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 by the respondent No.1/ Workman.2. The Workman while working as Packer at Koyambedu Fair Price Shop, was charged with deficit of stock and was suspended on 30.03.1991. The workman was served with charge memo on 23.05.1991, being not satisfied with the explanation of the Workman, domestic enquiry was ordered.3. The enquiry officer found the Workman guilty of charges. The competent authority by accepting the findings of the enquiry officer, termina...
Settu Alias Ranganathan. Vs. State by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer.:- Appeal is filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 05.08.2005 made in S.C.No.118 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Ranipet.J U D G M E N T1. The appeal arises out of the Judgment of conviction and sentence made in S.C.No,118 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranipet, whereby, the accused was convicted for the offences under Sections 366, 342 and 376 IPC and for the offence under Section 366 IPC, sentenced to undergo 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo one year imprisonment; for the offence under Section 342 IPC, sentenced to undergo one year imprisonment; for the offence under Section 376 IPC, sentenced to undergo 7 years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo one year imprisonment.2. The respondent Police filed a charge sheet against the accused stating that on 24.12.2004, the ...