Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neelamalai Agro Industries Limited. Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the entire records leading to the impugned order Na.Ka.D.No.034313/2011 dated 08.12.2011 passed by the respondent and quash the same.ORDER1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Company seeking to challenge an order dated 08.12.2011 issued by the District Collector, Udagamandalam. By the said order, the petitioner was informed that their request to remove the tea plant in the Ulikkal Village, Kunoor Taluk in S.Nos.102/6 and 36/2B by using JCB machines and for levelling the field cannot be considered in the light of the report of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kunoor, wherein it was informed that even for agricultural purposes, JCB machines cannot be used. Hence the petitioner Estate was denied permission to use JCB machines for the removal of tea plants in the said survey numbers.2. When the matter came up on 26.6.2012, this court directed t...
R.ShabanA. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertianing to the order, dated 1.2.2011, of the second respondent under Rc.No.AC-II(1)/48191/2010, quash the same order dated 1.2.11 of the 2nd respondent and to pass an order directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to issue the Provisional Certificate II to the petitioner.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. The petitioner has stated that she had joined in the third respondent college, for pursuing Bachelor of Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences Degree course, during the academic year, 2003-2004. She had successfully completed the degree course, in the month of February, 2008. Thereafter, the first respondent had issued a Provisional Certificate, on 13.5.2008. The petitioner had started her one year Compulsory Internship, from 20.5.2008. However, there was a ...
Chinnasalem Sengundar. Vs. Kailasanathan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi, dated 01.03.2012 made in I.A. No: 101 of 2012 in O.S. No: 10 of 1996.O R D E R1. In this Civil Revision Petition, petitioner called in question an order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi, made in I.A. No: 101 of 2012 in O.S. No: 10 of 1996 dated 01.03.2012.2. The revision petitioner is the 3rd defendant in the suit which was filed for a preliminary decree of partition and for separate possession of plaintiffs 3/8th share in the suit schedule properties set out in Schedules A to C hereunder and also for a decree for mandatory injunction ordering the demolition of the superstructures put up by defendants 3 and 5 to 89 in the properties set out in Schedules B & C. There are 90 defendants in the suit. The 90th defendant had filed a written statement and contested the matter. The hearing of the suit had been proceeded with....
The Management of WavIn India Ltd. Vs. the Principal Labour Court and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
PRAYER IN W.P.No.1856 of 2008The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the common findings/award dated 02.07.2007 of the first respondent passed in I.D. No.195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 240, 241, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712 and 713 of 1990.PRAYER IN W.P.No.1857 of 2008The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 02.07.2007 of the learned Labour Court passed in I.A.No.272 of 2006 in I.D.No.702 of 1990.PRAYER IN W.P.No.3787 of 2008The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned award of the learned Labour Court passed in I.D.No.200 of 1990 dated 02.07.2007 and quantify the retrenchment compensation with consequential direction to The Manage...
V.Kathirvel. Vs. Arulmozhi and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC against the order and decreetal order dated 29.02.2012 made in I.A.No......of 2011 in O.S.No.22 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 29.02.2012 made in unnumbered I.A. in O.S.No.22 of 2007, by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard both sides.3. A thumbnail sketch of the relevant facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision, would run thus:The respondents filed the suit based on mortgage. The revision petitioners herein who were the defendants therein, were served with notice and they filed the written statement also. On the side of the plaintiffs', P.W.1 was examined,, but the said P.W.1 was not cross examined and thereafter, the preliminary decree was passed ex parte. Subsequently, an application under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC was filed with an application to get the delay of 734 ...
N.Somu Alias Somaskanthan. Vs. Director of Elementary Education and or ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
PrayerW.P.(MD) No.15001 of 2010 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certioraified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings Moo.Mu.No.01441/A3/10 dated 20.8.2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate measures for effective and proper running of Sri Konkaneswara Vidhyasala Elementary School, Mela Veedhi, Tanjore.W.P.(MD) No.5123 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records which culminated in passing the impugned order by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.2085/A3/2012 dated 09.04.2012 and quash the same.COMMON ORDERR.BANUMATHI,J1. Public Interest Litigation in W.P.(MD) No.15001 of 2010 has been filed to quash the Proceedings dated 20.8.2010 in Moo.Mu.No.01441/A3/10 issued by the District Elementary Educational Officer, Thanjavur and consequently, direc...
P.Veeramani. Vs. the Chief Engineer (Personnel)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to order of the first respondent in No.140871/1052/G102/2005-/ dated 17.03.2006 and proceedings of second respondent letter No.02647/0233/Nee.Pee.1/U.4/ Kho.Va.Ve/2006 dated 09.03.2006, quash the same and direct the respondents herein to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground in anyone of the suitable post T.N.E.B within the jurisdiction of second respondent.O R D E R1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the orders of the respondents 1 and 2 dated 17.03.2006 and 09.03.2006 and for a direction to the respondents herein to provide appointment to the petitioner on compassionate ground in any suitable post in T.N.E.B. within the jurisdiction of second respondent.2. The petitioner's father was employed as an Assessor with the third respondent. His father expired on 02.01.1995 while in service. Having obtained all...
Faizal. Vs. the Secretary to Government and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
Prayer:- Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the detention order in G.O.No.S.R.I/815-6/2011 dated 06.02.2012 passed by the 1st respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondent to produce the body of the person of the detenu namely Mohamed Kassime aged about 33 years son of Abdoul Lattif before this Court, now detained under section 3[1] of the COFEPOSA Act in the Central Prison, Cuddalore and set him at liberty.O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by K.N.BASHA,J. & P.DEVADASS, J.)1. The petitioner who is the brother-in-law of the detenu, viz., Mohamed Kassime, S/o.Abdoul Lattif, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the first respondent dated 06.02.2012 slapped on the detenu under the provision of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.2. Mr.Palanikumar, learned counsel...
St. Joseph Teacher Training Institute. Vs. Union Territory of Pondiche ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to G.O.Ms.No.64, dated 25.05.2006 passed by the 1st respondent, quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to approve the admission of 100 candidates (listed in the annexure hereto) made by the petitioner to the D.T.Ed., CENTAC and Management seats for the academic year 2007-2008.PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to G.O.Ms.No.64, dated 25.05.2006 and G.O.Ms.No.72 dated 15.07.2008 in so far as it requires 50% of seat in Private Professional Educational Institution offering B.Ed., and D.T.Ed., Courses to be filled up by candidates belonging to Puducherry, and G.O.Ms.No.21 dated 10.02.2010 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same.PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the...
N.Krishnan. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to include the petitioner's name in the seniority panel list as per proceedings of B.P.No.Ms.(F.B.) No.65 dated 12.8.1985 (by Administrative Branch) Para 3 Sub Clause (iv).O R D E R1. Mr.S.P.Prabakaran, the learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 18.10.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the first respond...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »