Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Minor B.Monisha Narayani. Vs. Emerald Valley Public School and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent school to admit the first petitioner B.Monisha Narayani in class 9, second petitioner K.B.Kirthi Vasan in Class 8 and the third petitioner K.B.Nandan Imayavaramban in class 5 by charging the fees as fixed by the Tamil Nadu State Government for the first respondent school for the academic year 2012-2013.ORDER1. The writ petition is filed by the petitioners, i.e. two minor sons and one minor daughter, represented by their mother, seeking for a direction to the first respondent to admit the first petitioner B.Monisha Narayani in class 9, the second petitioner K.B.Kirthi Vasan in class 8 and the third petitioner K.B.Nandan Imayavaramban in class 5 by charging fees as fixed by the Tamil Nadu Government in respect of the first respondent school for the academic year 2012-2013.2. On behalf of minor petitioners, their guardian and mother appe...
Pachamuthu. Vs. Ramasamy Gounder
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order of the learned District Munsif, Sankarai, dated 10.12.2009 made in I.A.No.700 of 2009 in O.S.No.163 of 2007.ORDER1. The petitioner has preferred the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 10.12.2009, in I.A.No.700 of 2009 in O.S.No.163 of 2007, passed by the learned District Munsif, Sankari.2. The Learned District Munsif, while passing orders in I.A.No.700 of 1989, in O.S.No.163 of 2007, on 10.12.2009 has among other this observed that, " this court is also of the opinion that the petitioner could not be permitted to file the proposed additional written statement when most of the cross examination of P.W.1 was completed and the matter was in the part heard stage. It is settled law that by way of additional written statement, the defendant could not introduce a new case or mutually destructive pleas etc.," and consequently, dismissed the application with costs.3...
D.Mercy Meddilda Mary. Vs. the District Collector, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the first respondent impugned proceedings Na.Ka.No.A8/2183/2012 dated 8.6.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the Gopalapuram Village Panchayat to issue cheques with the petitioner's joint signature along with the President.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the first respondent impugned proceedings Na.Ka.No.A8/2183/2012 dated 8.6.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the Gopalapuram Village Panchayat to issue cheques with the petitioner's joint signature along with the President.2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. The impugned order is passed by the first respondent. No relief is sought for against the respondents 3 and 4. Hence, the respondents 3 a...
P.Lakshmanan. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Dept with effect from 31.05.99 as per G.O.Ms.3037 Public works dept. dated 22.12.1996 and the subsequent amendments.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to promote the petitioner as Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department with effect from 31.05.99 as per G.O.Ms.3037 Public Works Department dated 22.12.1996 and subsequent amendments.2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as per the amendment made in the Tamil Nadu Engineering Service and Tamil Nadu Engineering Subordinate Service, Special Rules, every 4th vacancy of Assistant Executive Engineer is to be filled up by the candidate, holding qualification of Diploma.3...
i.R.Babu. Vs. the Director General, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent herein to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 14.07.2008 to take him in service of CISF Unit NLC with all monetary benefit.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation, dated 14.07.2008.2. It has been stated that the petitioner had submitted a representation, dated 14.07.2008, to the first respondent, to take back the petitioner in service, with all monetary benefits, in view of his honorable acquittal, by the learned Judicial Magistrate in C.C.No. 181 of 2003, dated 05.09.2008, by setting aside the order of dismissal, passed by the 3rd respondent, on 05.09.2002, and confirmed by the second respondent, on 20.12.2002. However, no order has been passed by the first respondent on the said representation, till date .3. A counter affidavit has been f...
S.Venkatasubramanian. Vs. S.Kannammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decretal Order dated 21.11.2009 made in I.A.No.1160 of 2009 in O.S.No.386 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi.ORDER1. The Revision Petitioner/Plaintiff has focussed the present Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 21.11.2009 made in I.A.No.1160 of 2009 in O.S.No.386 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi, in dismissing the Application praying for amendment of short and long cause title in the Plaint (as stated therein).2. The trial Court, while passing order in I.A.No.1160 of 2009 in O.S.No.386 of 2005 on 21.11.2009, has, inter alia, observed that 'the Revision Petitioner/Plaintiff has not proved that he has been taken in adoption by one Kuppusamy Iyer on 07.08.1959' and resultantly, dismissed the Application praying for amendment of short and long cause title in the Plaint.3. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Plaintif...
K.Tamilarasu. Vs. I.C.S.Benefit Fund (P) Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to release the deposit amount both the 2nd respondent as per orders of Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Coimbatore in C.C.No.212 of 2003 in C.M.P.No.1032/2010 dated 29.11.2010.O R D E R1. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent had submitted that the amount of Rs.25,792/-, said to be due to the petitioner, would be paid to him, if such an order is passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.212 of 2003.2. Recording the said submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent, the writ petition stands closed, as no further orders are necessary. No costs....
Gail India Ltd. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to provide adequate protection for the officials, labourers, machinery and t he pipelines installed by the petitioner corporation in the lands subject mater of the acquisition notification in S.O.No.865(E), dated 20.04.2012, S.O.No.1201(E), dated 25.5.2012, S.O.No.392(E), dated 07.03.2012, S.O.No.12(E), dated 04.01.2012, S.O.No.2865(E), dated 27.12.2011, S.O.No.2832(E), dated 19.12.2011 of Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas issued notification under Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipe Lines (Acquisition of Rights of Users in Land) Act, 1962 for the purpose of Cochi-Koottanad-Mangalore-Bangaluru Pipeline Project through the districts of Salem, Coimbatore, Krishnagiri, Dharmapuri, Namakkal, Erode and Tiruppur in the State of Tamil Nadu.ORDER1. The petitioner is the Gas Authority of India Limited, represented by its Senior Manager...
Sochamaniammal Alias Kochamallu Ammal. Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd Respondent's Notice dated 19.10.2010 under reference No.NaKa396/2006/A.1 and quash the same as illegal and invalid, consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to conduct enquiry under Section.15 sub section (1) of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act 2001 pursuant to the Petitioners reply dated 26.10.2010ORDER1. This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd Respondent's Notice dated 19.10.2010 under reference No.NaKa396/2006/A.1 and quash the same as illegal and invalid, consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to conduct enquiry under Section.15 sub section (1) of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act 2001 pursuant to the Petitioners reply dated 26.10.20102. The subject matter of the writ petition is an acquisition of land under Tamil Nadu State Highways Act 34/ 2002.3. In terms of Section 15 of...
Ms.P.Selvam Timbers. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein to issue Form III permit to the petitioner at the Tamil Nadu Forest Department Check Post of Tamil Nadu-Karnataka Border, when the petitioner consignment of silver oak timber logs with valid documents except Transport permit is transported from the State of Karnataka into the State of Tamil Nadu by the petitioner.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein to issue Form III permit to the petitioner at the Tamil Nadu Forest Department Check Post of Tamil Nadu-Karnataka Border, when the petitioner consignment of silver oak timber logs with valid documents except Transport permit is transported from the State of Karnataka into the State of Tamil Nadu by the petitioner.2. Mr.M.K.Subramanian, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent the writ petitio...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »