Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.A.M.Gunalan. Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer in W.P.No.11607 of 2012 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.51, Housing and Urban Development (HB4(1) Department dated 5.3.2012 and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Letter No.NTR9/1210/05 dated 22.3.2012 and quash the same.COMMON ORDER1. The petitioners in this batch of Writ Petitions are occupants of the various flats under Public Rental Quota Scheme at Mandavelipakkam, Chennai 28. Admittedly, the flats belonged to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, namely the 2nd respondent herein. In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners seek to challenge an order passed by the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.51, Housing and Urban Development (HB4(1) Department dated 5.3.2012 and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 22.3.2012.2. The contention raised by the petitioners was that the Housing Board has constructed residential units. Out of 2...
The Management of Desk to Desk Courier and Cargo Ltd. Vs. Mr.M.Pradeep ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records connected with the award dated 31.7.2006 in I.D.No.484 of 1997 on the file of the second respondent, I Additional Labour Court, Chennai and quash the same.O R D E R1. The Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner management, which is a courier company seeking to challenge an award passed by the 2nd respondent Labour Court made in I.D.No.484 of 1997 dated 31.7.2006. By the impugned award, the Labour Court directed reinstatement of the 1st respondent in service with backwages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits.2. The Writ Petition was admitted on 20.1.2007. Pending the Writ Petition, interim stay was granted.3. It is seen from the records that the workman was employed as a Temporary Field Staff by the petitioner on 1.8.1990 at the regional office. His service was confirmed on 22.5.1995 in the post of Supervisor-Operations. However, by an order dated 24....
Maanila Retired Teachers-officials. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a appropriate order directions or writ including a Writ of Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to extend the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.371, Finance (Pension) Department, dated 30.04.1986 to the members of the Petitioner Association and reckon the Dearness Allowance and Additional Dearness Allowance drawn by them as Dearness Pay for the purpose of calculation of pension as per the said Government Order and re-fix the Pension/ Family Pension as the case may be of the members of the Petitioner Association and grant them all consequential benefits including payment of arrears.ORDER1. The petitioner/ Association has filed the present writ petition praying for issuance of an order by this Court in directing the respondent/ Government of Tamil Nadu to extend the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.371, Finance (Pension) Department, dated 30.04.1986 to the members of the petitioner/ Associ...
Sri Pasuveswara Ladies Self Help Group. Vs. the Forest Range Officer a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to issue an order of allotment to sell the small forest produces collected through the Kongadai and Thalakarai Village Forest Council respectively to the petitioners for the year 2006-2007 in conformity with the G.O.Ms.No.79 Environment Forest (Forest 14) Department dated 29.04.2003.C O M M O N O R D E R1. The Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement that the relief sought for in these Writ Petitions no longer survives and hence, prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petitions. Also, the Learned Counsel has made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundles.2. Recording the aforesaid endorsements, this Court dismisses these Writ Petitions as infructuous ones. No costs....
Ms.Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd. Vs. the Joint Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Tax Case Appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B Bench, Chennai, dated 24.5.2005 passed in I.T.A.No.1337/ Mds/2000 for assessment year 1997-98.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J)1. The assessee has preferred the appeal as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to assessment year 1997-98. The above Tax Case (Appeal) was admitted on the following substantial question of law:-"Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that for the purpose of computation under Section 115JA of the Act, the prior years expenses should not be deducted since the same was not debited in the profit and loss account?"2. It is seen from the narration of facts that the book profit shown by the assessee was computed after deducting prior period expenses of Rs.96,94,693/-. While processing the return, the Assessing Authority viewed that as per the provisions of the Companies Act, prior year adjustments could not be reduced for arriving ...
D.Arumugam. Vs. the District Collector, and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 1.8.2011 and to initiate necessary action on the petitioner's representation dated 1.8.2011 within the time that may be fixed by this Court.ORDER1. The petitioner seeks writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 1.8.2011 and to take appropriate action.2. The petitioner is a resident of No.1/132, V.O.C.Street, Chithalapakkam, Chennai 600 073 and he is said to have purchased the same in the year 1999. The grievance of the petitioner is that his neighbours Dhanapal and Elumalai are causing disturbance and that they are threatening the petitioner without any rhyme or reason. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have given a representation on 1.8.2011 seeking protection for his person as well as his property. Stat...
Ms.Thangam Steels Ltd. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the third respondent culminating in his impugned demand bearing in Lr.No.SE/CEDC/N/DFC/AAO/HT/A.4/F-TAX/D/2010, dated 10.02.2012 issued to the petitioner and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or sale of Electricity Act, 2003 and also unconstitutional.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the third respondent culminating in his impugned demand bearing in Lr.No.SE/CEDC/N/DFC/AAO/HT/A.4/F-TAX/D/2010, dated 10.02.2012 issued to the petitioner and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or sale of Electricity Act, 2003 and also unconstitutional.2. Mr.G.Vasudevan, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. By the ...
Ms.Vijaya Hospital. Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records connected with the order dated 16.03.2007 made in Approval Petition No.2 of 2005 passed by the first respondent and quash the same.O R D E R1. Heard both sides.2. The petitioner is the Management of Vijaya Hospital, Chennai. In this writ petition, the petitioner Management challenges the order dated 16.03.2007 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Chennai, in Approval Petition No.2/2005. The Tribunal, by the impugned order, declined to grant approval and dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner Management.3. The writ petition was admitted by this Court on 05.04.2007 and an order of interim injunction was also granted. Subsequently, the contesting second respondent filed two applicatinos in M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2007 seeking for a direction to pay the last drawn wages as well as to vacate the interim order passed by this Court. Those applicat...
C.Manoharan. Vs. the Tahsildar (Village Natham) Ambattur Taluk and ors ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the name of the petitioner for the grant of patta in respect of the S.No.163/2B, in Pandeeswaram Village, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District on their long standing enjoyment over the Natham land.O R D E R1. This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the name of the petitioner for the grant of patta, in respect of the property situated in S.No.163/2B, in Pandeeswaram Village, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District, on his long standing enjoyment over the Natham land.2. No appearance for the respondents 3 to 5.3. A counter affidavit, dated 29.11.2011, has been filed denying the averments made by the petitioner in his affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.4. Paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit reads as follows:"9. It is respec...
The Chief Engineer. Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to I.D.No.16 of 2004 and quash the order of the Labour Court, Salem dated 08.03.2005.O R D E R1. Heard both sides.2. This writ petition is filed by the Chief Engineer, Mettur Thermal Power Station, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mettur Dam, challenging the award dated 08.03.2005 passed by the Labour Court, Salem in I.D.No.16/2004. By the impugned award, the Labour Court directed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board to absorb the workman Selamban with effect from 28.10.1999 and to grant backwages.3. The writ petition was admitted on 05.09.2007. Pending the writ petition, this Court granted an order of interim stay.4. It is seen from the records that the workman Selamban was entered as Contract Labour. Subsequently, he was absorbed as Helper. By an order dated 28.10.1999, he was stopped from work for the reason that the name of his father ...