Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Noorudeen. Vs. the District Collector.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to release the 250 bags of rice each 50 kg seized from Lorry No.T.C.E.6136 by the 2nd respondent on 24.09.2006 to the petitioner on furnishing immovable property security.O R D E R1. The Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement that the Writ Petition has become an infructuous one and has prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Recording the said fact of the Writ Petition becoming an infructuous one, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as an infructuous one. No costs....
T.Narasimhavarman and ors. Vs. the Registrar of Co-operative Societies
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent dated 01.01.2002 as referred in his proceedings made in Na.Ka.55986/2007/Pa-tho-1 dated 10.05.2007 and quash the same in so far as the revision made including the 1998 qualified Senior Inspectors over and above the name of 1995 qualified Senior Inspectors are concerned and consequently directing the respondent to effect promotions as Co-operative Sub-Registrars as per the order of seniority prepared pursuant to Panel made in RC.61422/95/EM1 dated 08.08.1995 and thereafter consider the promotions of subsequently eligible Senior Inspectors as per their regular order of seniority.O R D E R1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition seeking to challenge the circular of the respondent dated 10.05.2007 in so far as including the 1998 qualified Senior Inspectors over and above the name of 1995 qualified Se...
C.Suryakumari. Vs. the Presiding Officer, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the concerned records from the first respondent, quash the award dated 23.08.2006 passed by the first respondent Tribunal in I.D.No.62 of 2005 in so far as declining the relief of reinstatement with full backwages and continuity of service and consequently direct the respondent No.2 and 3 to reinstate the petitioner in service with full backwages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits.O R D E R1. The petitioner was an employee of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (for short BSNL). She has filed the present writ petition, challenging the Award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court (for short CGIT) made in I.D.No.62 of 2005 dated 23.08.2006. By the impugned Award, the CGIT granted only the relief of Rs.10,000/- as compensation in lieu of all claims.2. The writ petition was admitted on 08.02.2007. Subsequently, when the m...
R.Muthurkrishnan. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer in W.P.No.31634/07 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to revise the date of promotion of the petitioner as well as his seniority in the cadre of Labour Officer on the basis of revised seniority list of Deputy Inspectors of Labour issued on 07.06.2007.Prayer in W.P.No.36989/07 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent's Memorandum No.E4/7564/04 dated 16.04.2004 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to redraw the seniority list in the cadre of Assistant Inspector of Labour as on 1.4.1984 and refix the seniority of the petitioner within the admitted substantive vacancies of 241 as on 01.04.1984, more specifically at S.No.207 above Thiru K.Kadirvelu and below C.Poosai Pandian by applying the quota rota rule contained in the special rules and in accordance with the order of...
Management of Gemini Colour Lab. Vs. S.Ramanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the award dated 30.10.2006 in I.D.No.870 of 1999 passed by the second respondent herein, viz., Presiding Officer, II Additional Labour Court, Chennai, quash the same.O R D E R1. The Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner management seeking to challenge an award passed by the 2nd respondent Labour Court, Chennai in I.D.No.817 of 1999 dated 30.10.2006. By the impugned award, the Labour Court directed that the workman was entitled to wages from 15.11.1998 to 15.11.2001 and also balance of retirement benefit as if the workman retired on 15.11.2001.2. The Writ Petition was admitted on 9.7.2007. Pending the Writ Petition, interim stay was granted. Subsequently, by an order dated 14.2.2008, this Court, after calculating the backwages, which comes approximately Rs.2 Lakhs, directed the petitioner management to pay Rs.1 Lakh towards backwages. Thereafter, the ...
SrilekhA. Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.04.2012 and not to detain the petitioner's father Mr.G.G.Ramesh, S/o.Ganapathy, residing at No.5, Vaidhya Vasu Devan Street, Vellore as Act 14/82 as Goonda to secure the ends of justice.ORDER1. The question arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the petitioner's father's detention can be prevented from being detained under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 even before any detention order is issued by the second respondent Detaining Authority, i.e., District Collector, Vellore ?2. The petitioner claims to be a medical graduate and is an house surgeon. It is her case that her father G.G.Ramesh was running a lodge at Vellore known as M/s.Geethanjali Lodge. According to her, he is a disabled person. He is having continuous treatment in the CMC Hospital, Vellor...
C.Anantharaman. Vs. the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the respondents herein in Na.Ka.No.84/1997/Sa.Pa., dated 18.10.2007 of the second respondent as confirmed in the proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.10144/2007/Sa.Pa.1, dated 31.1.2008 and quash the said impugned orders.ORDER1. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner challenging an order of the second respondent, i.e., Regional Deputy Registrar (Housing), dated 18.10.2007 and confirmed by the order of the first respondent, dated 31.1.2008.2. The writ petition was admitted on 28.2.2008. Pending the writ petition, an interim stay was granted after observing that the petitioner was in possession and though the sale certificate was issued as early as 1993, it was sought to be cancelled only in the year 2007. Further, it was recorded that the petitioner will not part with his title and interest in the property pending disp...
K.Govindaraj Vs. the Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
PRAYERWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order made in G.O.2D No.140 Commercial Taxes and Registration (A1) Department Dated 02.09.2011 issued by the 1st respondent insofar it relates to regularization of petitioner's service from the date of issue of the order and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to regularize the petitioner with effect from the date of petitioner initial appointment.ORDER1. The petitioner was initially appointed as a casual labour in the respondent department on being sponsored through Employment Exchange. He was promoted and posted as Night Watchman on 16.01.1993. He made a representation on 29.09.2008, seeking regularization of his service from the date of his initial appointment. Thereafter, he filed W.P.(MD) No.10111 of 2008, seeking for a direction to the fourth respondent to regularize the appointment from ...
V.Nagarajan Alias Palaniyandi Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- with 9% interest from 20.10.2002 till date of realisation for the death of the petitioner's son Vijayakumar, in the Noon Meal Scheme, "Hot Sambar Bowl Accident" happened on 17.10.2002 in the 4th respondent's schoolO R D E R1. Father, who has lost his son aged about 6 years, due to the negligence of the staff, attached to the Hon'ble Chief Minister's Children Nutritious Meals Scheme Centre attached to Panchayat Union Elementary School, Karuppampatti Village, Evoor Post, Musiri Taluk, Thiruchirappally District, has sought for compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- with 9% interest per annum from 20.10.2002, till the date of realisation and for further orders.2. According to him, his son Vijaya Kumar aged about 6 years, was studying in Std-I, in the above said school and that on 17.10.2002, his wife informed him th...
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. R.N.Shanmugam and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree, dated 12.11.2002, made in M.C.O.P.No.291 of 1999 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Addl. District Court cum Sessions Court), Dharapuram.JUDGMENT1. This civil miscellaneous appeal is preferred by appellant-Corporation challenging the quantum of compensation awarded in the judgment and decree dated 12.11.2002, made in M.C.O.P.No.291 of 1999 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court cum Sessions Court), Dharapuram.2. In the claim petition, the petitioner/1st respondent has stated that on 17.2.1998 at about 4.15 pm, the petitioner tried to get into the bus bearing Registration No.TN 33 N 406 through the front door. At that time, the first respondent moved the bus in a rash and negligent manner with a high speed without following the rules and due to that the petitioner was thrown off from the bus and fell down on the road ...