Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Kesavan. Vs. the Presiding Officer, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer in both Writ Petitions:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent in connection with the Award pronounced in I.D.Nos.699 and 700 of 1999 on 30.04.2007 quash the same holding the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement by the 2nd respondent with backwages, continuity of service including permanancy, all the attendant benefits.O R D E R1. These two Writ Petitions are filed by two workmen challenging the two awards passed by the II Additional Labour Court, Chennai made in I.D.Nos.699 and 700 of 1999 dated 30.4.2007 respectively. By the impugned awards, the Labour Court declined to grant any relief to the two workmen in respect of their demand for employment as against the 2nd respondent management of Audco India Limited, but on the contrary granted the reinstatement as against the 3rd respondent with 50% of the backwages and continuity of service and other attendant benefits.2. The two Wri...
The Regional Manager. Vs. the Presiding Officer, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent in I.D.No.422 of 2004 and quash its award dated 25.4.2007 and pass such further or other orders.O R D E R1. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner Central Bank of India represented by its Regional Manager, Chennai challenging an award passed by the 1st respondent Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (for short 'CGIT'). By the impugned award, the CGIT directed that the payment of arrears of salary with attendant benefits to the 14 Safai Karmacharies concerned in the Dispute as per the settlement dated 28.11.1997 was legal and the workmen are entitled to get arrears of salary.2. The writ petition was admitted on 2.1.2008. Pending the writ petition, this Court granted interim stay. Subsequently, the interim stay was made absolute on 27.1.2002 and the vacate stay application was dismissed.3. The case of the 2nd respondent ...
P.Shuyjaath Raheed and ors. Vs. the State Bank of India and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
PRAYER in C.R.P.(PD) No.936 of 2012: Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dated 21.12.2011 in R.A.No.88 of 2010.PRAYER in C.R.P.(PD) No.937 of 2012: Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dated 29.8.2011 in R.A.No.88 of 2010.O R D E RP.JYOTHIMANI,J.1. The revision in C.R.P. (PD) No.936 of 2012 has been filed against the order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dated 21.12.2011 in R.A.No.881 of 2010, by which the Appellate Tribunal while dismissing the appeal filed against the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chennai in O.A.No.368 of 2007 as withdrawn, has granted liberty to the petitioners to seek relief before the Recovery Officer with respect to the proceedings under Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act, with a direction to the Recovery Officer to dispose of the same by following the procedure and g...
Nayala Amtur Rahim. Vs. Assistant Elementary Educational Officer and o ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
W.P.No.28062 of 2008 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the recoreds relating to the reference N.K.476/A2/2006, dated 21.8.2007 of the Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Kancheepuram arrayed herein as the first respondent as well as in O.M.No.13510/A3/2007 dated 31.01.2008 of the Director of Teacher Education Research and Training Chennai herein arrayed as the second respondent and quashing the same and directing the respondents to treat and accept the petitioner's teachers' certificate issued to the petitioner on 25.6.1988 by the Karnataka Secondary Education Examination Board as equivalent to that of the Tamil Nadu and accord the evaluation and approval to the same and pay the petitioner all the arrears of salary that have been hitherto withheld.W.P.No.8294 of 2010 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for t...
V.YoharajA. Vs. the Special Commissioner or Director and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Rc.No.La.1/48438/2006 (LA), dated 25.5.2007 on the file of the first respondent herein and to quash the same.ORDER1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to challenge an order of the first respondent dated 25.5.2007. By the impugned order, the order passed by the second respondent Deputy Director was set aside and he was directed to give appropriate punishment in terms of the misconduct committed by the petitioner after going into records.2. The writ petition was admitted on 29.8.2007. Pending the writ petition, an interim stay was granted. On notice from this court, the respondents have filed a counter affidavit, dated 15.11.2007. The petitioner also field an additional typed set containing several documents including the enquiry report.3. It is seen from the records that the petitioner was ...
The Workmen, Represented by the President. Vs. Management, Madras Fert ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records and papers from the file of the 2nd respondent Tribunal in I.D.No.58 of 2002 and quash its impugned Award made therein dated 27.11.2006 insofar as it has negatived and denied the claim of the petitioner Union for making 73 contract workmen employed in the canteen of the first respondent Management as permanent workmen of the first respondent Management.O R D E R1. The petitioner is a Trade Union. In this writ petition, they have challenged an Award passed by the Industrial Tribunal at Chennai made in I.D.No.58 of 2002 dated 27.11.2006. By the impugned Award, the Tribunal rejected the reference made by the State Government and refused to grant any relief to the workmen represented by the petitioner Union.2. The writ petition was admitted on 04.01.2008.3. At the initiative of the petitioner Union, an industrial dispute was raised under Section 2K of the Industrial ...
The Management of Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. Vs. the Presiding Officer an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer in W.P.22076 of 2007:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent in I.D.No.209/05 and quash its award dated 02.5.2006 insofar as it directs the petitioner to pay compensation to the 2nd respondent.Prayer in W.P.29671 of 2007:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent in connection with its award dated 2.5.2006 in I.D.No.209/05 and quash the same insofar as it holds that the issue of the petitioner's claim for permanency cannot be considered along with that of the legality of his termination from service and insofar as it denies the relief of reinstatement with continuity of service with back wages and other consequent benefits to the petitioner.COMMON ORDER1. Both Writ Petitions challenge an award made in I.D.No.209 of 2005 dated 02.05.2006 passed by the 1st respondent Labour Court, Salem. The said ...
M.Murugan and ors. Vs. the Presiding Officer and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer in W.P.No.31022 of 2007 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records pertaining to I.D.No.27/04 and quash the award dated 13.4.2007 passed by the 1st respondent dismissing the same and further direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioners in service.Prayer in W.P.No.34626 of 2007 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records of the first respondent in connection with the Award in I.D.No.27 of 2004 dated 13.4.2007 published on 13.7.2007 and quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the workers in service with full backwages and continuity of service.C O M M O N O R D E R1. These two writ petitions were filed against an award passed by the Industrial Tribunal in I.D.No.27 of 2004 dated 13.4.2007. By the impugned award, the 1st respondent Industrial Tribunal dismissed the industrial dispute raised by the ...
V.M.Chacko. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer in Writ Petition:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent in G.O (Nilai) No.175 Revenue (Ni. Mu.11(1) Department, dated 26.5.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the obstructions illegally by the fourth respondent the property of the petitioner as well as in the lease deed.Prayer in Contempt Petition: Petition filed under Section11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for not obeying the order of this Hon'ble Court order dated 3.6.2009 in M.P.No.3 of 2009 in W.P.No.9910 of 2009 in accordance with law.COMMON ORDER1. The Writ Petition is filed seeking to challenge an order of the 1st respondent made in G.O (Nilai) No. 175 Revenue (Ni. Mu.11(1) Department, dated 26.5.2009 and for a consequential direction to respondents to remove the obstructions illegally put up by the fourth...
Soundarrajan. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to accord permission for conduct of jellikattu on 22.04.2012 in Mittur Village, Vellore District based on the representation dated 26.3.2012 given by the petitioner to the second respondent.O R D E R1. The Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction to grant permission to conduct jellikattu on 22.04.2012 in Mittur Village, Vellore District based on his representation dated 26.3.2012. The petitioner claims to be the President of Mittur Village. In his representation dated 26.3.2012 given to the District Collector, the petitioner wanted to conduct festival in Amman Temple and also to conduct Jellikattu during the period from 6 to 8 of May 2012. As part of the festival, they want to have Jellikattu on any one of the days. According to the petitioner, as per the orders passed by the State Government, in terms of the Tamil Nadu Act in Vaniyambad...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »