Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.A.Gopinath.. Vs. the District Collector.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus to forbear the respondents either from withholding the transport permits or in any way interfering with the petitioner's right to transport the quarried mineral on payment of necessary seigniorage from the government quarry lands measuring 1.50 Acres comprised in Survey No.463(part), 3.00 Acres comprised in Survey No.464/4 (part), 2.25 Acres comprised in Survey No.465/4 (part) totally measuring 6.75 acres situated in AGALAKOTTAH Village, Denkanikotta Taluk, Krishnagiri District till the disposal of the W.P.No.21128 of 2006.O R D E R1. The Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement that 'the Writ Petition has become infructuous and hence not pressed'.2. In view of the fact that the present the Writ Petition has become an infructuous one and recording the said fact, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as an infructuous one. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous ...
S.Elumalai. Vs. the Presiding Officer and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records from the files of the 1st Respondent in I.D.No.645 of 1997 and quash its impugned award made therein dated 18.01.2007 insofar as the 1st Respondent has negatived the claim of the petitioner for reinstatement in service, with continuity of service, with backwages and with all other attendant and consequential benefits.O R D E R1. Heard both sides.2. The petitioner is a workman. Aggrieved by the award dated 18.01.2007 passed by the first respondent Labour Court, Chennai in I.D.No.645/1997 declining to grant any relief, the writ petition came to be filed.3. The writ petition was admitted on 11.12.2007. On notice from this Court, the second respondent Management has filed a counter affidavit dated 13.02.2012.4. The case of the workman was that he was employed in the second respondent Management with effect from 23.05.1989 as an Operator in the A...
The Management of Trident. Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the award of the 1st respondent herein in I.D.No.612 of 2000 dated 15.02.2006 and quash the same.O R D E R1. Heard both sides.2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Management challenging the award dated 15.02.2006 passed by the first respondent Labour Court, in I.D.No.612/2000. By the impugned award, the Labour Court directed reinstatement of the second respondent workman with continuity of service and other attendant benefits, but without backwages.3. The writ petition was admitted by this Court on 12.03.2007. Pending the writ petition, this Court granted an order of interim stay. Subsequently, on 09.07.2007, this Court directed the petitioner Management to deposit a sum of Rs.57,122/- representing the backwages within four weeks. On such deposit, the Labour Court was directed to invest the same in any one of the Nati...
C.P.Krishnan. Vs. K.Gokulan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the Award and Decree dated 6.10.2004 in M.C.O.P.No.281 of 2000 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri.JUDGMENT1. This Appeal is preferred against the Award and Decree dated 6.10.2004 in M.C.O.P.No.281 of 2000 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri.2. The Respondent/Petitioner has filed a claim petition before the Tribunal against the appellants, claiming compensation for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- for injuries sustained by him in an accident occurred on 24.4.1999 due to the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle by the driver of the first appellant.3. The case of the Respondent/Petitioner is that on 24.4.1999 at about 6.30 A.M. while the petitioner was returning from Palayampudur to Nallampalli in the Salem Dharmapuri Main Road, riding his Motor Cycle bearing the Regn.No.29-C-1765, observing the road rules prescribed, kee...
S.Damodaran. Vs. the Commissioner and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to pay the compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- as damages along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 14.4.2007 till the date of realization.ORDER1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.10 lakhs as damages along with interest at the rate of 18% with effect from 14.4.2007 till the date of realization of the amount.2. The writ petition was admitted on 07.11.2007. Pending the writ petition, in the application for an interim direction, only notice was ordered. On notice from this court, the second respondent, i.e., the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, has filed a counter affidavit dated 20.3.2012. The first respondent Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai has also filed a counter affidavit, dated 06.03.2012, to which the petitioner has filed a reply affidavit.3. Th...
M.Saraswathy. Vs. the Director of Employment and Training
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with order of termination cum show cause notice issued by him in his proceedings Memo No.723/PST/T3/99 dated 02.11.2001 and quash the same.O R D E R1. The petitioner was appointed to the post of Junior Assistant- cum -Typist against the post reserved for Destitute Widow in the year 1996 -1997.2. The petitioner joined the service on 12.02.1999, by submitting the Destitute Widow certificate dated 28.7.1994. It is submitted by the petitioner, that in the application filed with the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, she had disclosed all the facts regarding her financial status.3. It was on 24.12.2001, that the petitioner was issued show cause notice to show cause, as to why her appointment be not treated as cancelled, and further to show cause as to why she be not debarred fro...
Ms.Prime Gold International(P) Ltd. Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Dist ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Writ Petition No.14257 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the second respondent's impugned Memo.No.CE/Comml./EE/R&C/AEE/F.R&C/D.No.70-1/12 dated 12.03.2012 and the consequential letter No.SED/Gen/F.Power Cut/D 1526/2012 dated 30.03.2012 issued by the third respondent and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary.Writ Petition No.14258 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the second respondent's impugned Memo.No.CE/Comml./EE/R&C/AEE/F.R&C/D.No.70-1/12 dated 12.03.2012 and the consequential letter No.SE/CEDC/N/DFC/N/HT/A4/F.1577/D.1866/2012 dated 24.04.2012 issued by the third respondent and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary.Writ Petition No.14259 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the second responden...
Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (K-dn I) Ltd. Vs. Kalpana and or ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Civil miscellaneous appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award and decree dated 2.8.2001 made in MCOP No.902/2000 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Nagapattinam.JUDGMENT1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant/respondent as against the award and decree in MCOP No.902 of 2000 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Nagapattinam.2. The claimants/respondents 1 to 4 have filed the claim petition for compensation of Rs.10 lakhs for the death of one Gurumurthy. The case of the claimants is that on 31.7.2000, the deceased was proceeding to Arasanvanangadu, Mayanapuram, Tiruvarur-Kudavasal Road and at that time, the bus of the appellant/respondent in O.P. bearing Registration No.TN-49-N-0802, proceeding from Tiruvarur to Kumbakonam, was driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the above said Gurumurthy and he died and therefore, the acc...
S.Kuppusamy. Vs. the Enquiry Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer in W.P.No.23590 of 2007:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to Official Communication No.VC/REGR/CC(P)ASOI/2004/231 dated 19.05.2004 of the 2nd respondent, quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to pay the arrears of salary and other emoluments and other service benefits to the petitioner from 14.11.2003 till now.Prayer in W.P.No.36911 of 2007:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Official Communication No.D1(A)/TE/2007/2515 dated 11.10.2007 on the file of the respondent, quash the same and direct the respondent to promote the petitioner to the Cadre of Lecturer Senior Scale under Carrier Advance Scheme from 01.10.2004.Prayer in W.P.No.9140 of 2011:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records r...
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. B. Balakrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2012
Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree, dated 30.09.2004, made in M.C.O.P.No.881 of 2002 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Sub Judge), Krishnagiri.JUDGMENT1. This civil miscellaneous appeal is preferred by appellant-Corporation challenging the quantum of compensation awarded in the judgment and decree dated 30.9.2004, made in M.C.O.P.No.881 of 2002 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Sub Judge), Krishnagiri.2. In the claim petition, the petitioner/respondent has stated that on 29.10.2001, he boarded in the Bus bearing Regn.No.TN 29/N0813 belonging to the respondent-Corporation at Denkanikottah to go to Hosur and while travelling in the said bus, towards Hosur at about 19.30 hours, on account of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus, the bus capsized on the left side of the road. It is further stated that the petitioner sustained severe injuries and the accident ha...