Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C.Ramalingam Vs The Management
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED C.Ramalingam S/o. Chinnan 4, Meenakshi Amman Nagar Koundampalayam, Coimbatore 641 030. ..Petitioner Vs The Management Sri Ranganathan Industries Private Limited, Edayapalayam, Coimbatore 641 025 ..RespondentPrayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the award dated 01.11.2021 passed by the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore in ID No.17 of 2018 quash the same and consequently direct the respondent Management to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service back wages and all other attendant benefits award costs For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondent : No appearance Page1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. Even the learned counsel for the Respondent is also not present. T...
M. Smyrna Vs Mr. P. Vikram
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI M. Smyrna ..Petitioner(s) Vs Mr. P. Vikram Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk Office, Chennai 600 053. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate the Contempt Proceedings against the Respondent herein for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.17835 of 2025 dated 04.06.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.P.G. Thiyagu For Respondent : Mr.T.M. Rajangam Government Advocate -----ORDERLearned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the directions issued by this Court on 04.06.2025 in W.P. No.17835 of 2025 has been complied with. In support of his submission, he has produced a copy of the Legal Heirship Certificate of P. Metilda. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the aforesaid submission.2. The submissions made by learned counsel on either side are hereby recorded and the ord...
M.Swaminathan Vs K. Sridhar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Crl.M.P. No. 3535 of 2026 in Crl.R.C. No. 2883 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN,J.This petition is filed to implead the proposed party as 2nd respondent to the revision.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition for impleading is ordered. 27.02.2026 nv 1/2 (Note to Office: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title.) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Dr. J. Jayakumar Vs Dr. P. Senthilkumar and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Dr.J.Jayakumar ... Petitioner vs1. Dr.P.Senthilkumar, The Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. Dr.R.Suganthy Rajakumari Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.3. Dr.D.K.Chitra, Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006. RespondentsPrayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for contempt of Court for having not complied with the orders of this Court dated 01.02.2024 and made in W.P.No.1657 of 2021. For Petitioner : Dr.S.Karpagapriya For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippusulthan Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience and non- compliance with the order dated 01.02.2024 in W.P.No.1657 of 2021.2. When the contempt petition is taken up for hearing on admission,the lear...
The Assistant Commissioner Vs Wipro Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.5487 of 2026 and W.A.SR.No.103509 of 2025Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.Mahesh, learned counsel representing Mr.Muthu Venkataraman, learned counsel on record for the respondent conveys no objection to the condonation of delay of 65 days in filing the Writ Appeal.2. Hence, and also for thereasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous petition, the delay of 65 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [C.K, J.] 27.02.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
ISMAIL Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Ismail2. Mohamed Yousuf3. Bharani ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s)To relax the condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at about 10.30 a.m., until further orders imposed by this honourable court in crl op.no.35418 of 2025 dated 31.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.E. Kannadasan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioners in Crl OP.No.35418 of 2025 by order dated 31.12.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners have been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission, the condition imp...
E.Gandhidasan Vs Dr.Narnaware Manish Shankarrao IAS and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and Cont.P.Sr.No.15912 of 2026 E.Gandhidasan ...Applicants in both applications Vs. Tirupur District 641 654. ...Respondents in both applications Prayer in Sub Appl.No.153 of 2026: Sub Application filed under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, seeking to accept the cause title given in the above Cont.P.Sr.No.15912 of 2026 on the file of this Court filed against theorder dated 10.10.2025 made in W.P.No.4408 of 2025 passed by this HighCourt. Prayer in Sub Appl.No.152 of 2026: Sub Application filed under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, seeking to grant leave to the petitioner to file the Contempt Petition against the order dated 10.10.2025 made in W.P.No.4408 of 2025 passed by this High Court. In both Applications: Page No.1 of 4 For Applicant : Mr.Raghu For Respondents : Ms.Indhu Bala, Special Government PleaderORDERThis Court by its order dated 10.10.2025 issued a direction to ...
Mrs. K. Kala, Vs Mr. Sasikumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN Mrs.K.Kala, ..Petitioner Vs Mr.Sasikumar, ..Contemnor Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to issue summons to the 1st respondent and to punish them for the deliberate disobedience on the part of the 1st respondent in violation of the order dated 28.08.2023 made in W.P.No. 6494 of 2019 by this Hon'ble Court For Petitioner: Mr.J.Arun Prasad For Contemnor(s): Mr.P.Athi Veera Rama PandianORDERPursuant to the direction of this court dated 06.02.2026, a copy of letter in Ref.010600/legal/WP/6494/WP1202/01 dated 16.02.2026 issued by the respondent Insurance Company had been forwarded to the court indicating compliance of the order of this court. Page1 of 32. In view of the compliance reported, the contempt petition stands closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No ssk To Mr. Sasikumar, Page2 of 3C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.ssk...
V.Ravichandran, Vs Ganapathy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR V.Ravichandran ... Petitioner vs Erode Region, Erode. Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willfully and disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court dated 20.06.2022 in W.P.No.12859 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.Krishnasamy.R For Respondent : Mr.M.Muralivinoth Standing CounselORDERThis contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience and non- compliance with the order dated 20.06.2022 in W.P.No.12859 of 2022, whereby this Court had directed the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2022 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.T.VINOD KUMAR.J.,2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to pursue the contempt case.3. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the ...
SARAVANAN Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Saravanan2. Baskar ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s)To extend the time granted in Crl.OP No.32757/2025 dt. 01.12.2025 and Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.T.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for complying the conditions as per the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.32757/2025 dated 01.12.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioners to comply the conditions as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. GBI To 1.State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »