Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ananthi Sundaram vs the Selection Committee
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN And 1.Ananthi Sundaram 2.Rathika R ... Petitioners Vs. Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. ... RespondentPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to permit the petitioners to participate in the Additional Stray Vacancy Round to be conducted by the respondent herein pursuant to the Notification No.108/SCS II(1)/2024 dated 26.02.2025 and also by permitting the petitioners to surrender the PG seats allotted to them as free exit without demanding any penalty/deposit amount by considering the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2025.For Petitioners : Mr.D.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mrs.M.Sneha Standing CounselC.KUMARAPPAN,J.priORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that nothing survives in the present writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.Hence, the ...
V.Vasanthi vs Vanachelian @ Vanaraja
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and C.M.P.No.12469 of 2018 V.Vasanthi ... Appellant/Petitioner in both appeals -vs- V.Vanachelian @ Vanaraja ... Respondent/Respondent in both appeals Prayer in CMA 1574/2018: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under O.P.No.3290 of 2011 on the file of III Additional Family Court at Chennai. Prayer in CMA 1575/2018: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under O.P.No.4476 of 2011 on the file of III Additional Family Court at Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.S.Gunaseelan For Respondent : Notice Not Yet Returned *****J.NISHA BANU, J.ANDM.JOTHIRAMAN, J.arCOMMON JUDGMENT(By J.Nisha Banu,J.) When these matters are taken up for hearing, Mr.S.Gunaseelan (E.No.345 of 1994), learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these appeals and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the above submiss...
Ananthi Sundaram vs the Selection Committee
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
W.M.P.No.8835 of 2025 In W.P.No.7856 of 2025 W.M.P.No.8835 of 2025 In W.P.No.7856 of 2025C.KUMARAPPAN,J.Ordered subject to payment of separate Court fee. 21.08.2025 pri 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Gunasekaran vs Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 20.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN C.M.P.No.9205 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.36512 of 2025 K.Gunasekaran ... Petitioner -vs- Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Ms.P.T.Saleem Fathima For M.S.Elangovan Law Asso. For Respondent : Mr.A.Vinoth Raj *****ORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 118 days in filing the Appeal.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has got no serious objection in the delay being condoned.3. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavitfiled in support of this petition, this Court is of the view that the delay may be condoned, however, on payment of costs, and the matter may be argued on merits.4. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the delay iscondoned on payment of costs of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred...
J.Vanitha vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN J.Vanitha ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep.by Inspector of Police (Crime No.120 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.120 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.J.H.Magesh For Intervenor : Mr.Ponraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 506(1) of IPC, in Crime No.120 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The fourth anticipatory bail petition by the suspected accused inconnection with Crime No.120 of 2024, registered on 15.04.2024 for offences under Sections 420, 468 and 506(1) of IPC. The very fact th...
J.Vanitha Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN J.Vanitha ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep.by its, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.118 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.118 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : M/s.Nithyesh Nataraj for Mr.J.H.Magesh For Intervenor : Mr.Ponraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.118 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.2. For the case of job racketing, for providing a fake appointment orders, the matter is under investigation.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police...
The Management Vs The Appellate Authority
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and WMP.No.9665 of 2023 The Management K-678 Coimbatore Co-operative printing Society Ltd, Rep. by its Manager C.V.Rajan, S/o.C.Velayudham, No.1545, Trichy Road, Coimbatore-641 018. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Appellate Authority for Payment of Gratuity-Cum-Joint Commissioner of Labour, Office of The Appellate Authority for Payment of Gratuity-Cum-Joint Commissioner of 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Gratuity) Office of Joint Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore.3.N.Subramanian Respondent(S) PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent/ Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Gratuity), in P.G.A No. 47 of 2021 dated 23.02.2022 quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Deepak Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Jayanthy AGP for R1 And R2 Mr.M.Stalin for R3ORDERThe Writ Petition is filed seeking ...
R.Sivakumar Vs The State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P.No.9507 of 2023 & W.M.P.No.9576 of 2023 R.Sivakumar ... PetitionerVersus1. The State rep. By2. Shivakumar3. A.S.Senthil Kumar4. M.Vivek5. Nithyanandan6. R.Sathiyalakshmi7. S.Thenmozhi8. A.Tamilarasi9. A.Sumathi10. Venkata Ramesh Kumar11. P.N.Karthikeyan12. N.Maheshbabu 13.K.Balasubramaniyam14. R.Sivakumar15. R.Ganesan Page No.1 of 416. K.R.Naveen17. P.Ramachandran18. T.Yavana Kathiravan19. V.Alaguvel20. R.M.Valliammai21. Ashish Bali22. Dr.S.Ravichandran ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Declaration declaring the auction sale conducted dated 09.03.2023 in lieu of Na.Ka.No.28901/2013/11 issued by the 1st respondent as null and void. For Petitioner : Ms.L.Srilekha Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.L.M.D.Muhilan of R1 Additional Public Prosecutor Ms.Anandha Gomathy for R2 Mr.L.Rajendran for R19ORDE...
Commissioner of Income vs the Karur Vysya Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
2025:MHC:2064IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Commissioner Of Income Tax Trichy. .. Appellant vs The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Erode Road, Karur 639 002. .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, 'A' Bench, dated 17.01.2013 in ITA No.1070/Mds/2011. For Appellant : Mr.V.Mahalingam, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar PadmanabhanDR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR,J.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.V.Mahalingam, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant/Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal qua assessment period 2004-05 and seek withdrawal of the same on account of the low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09....
R.Sundaravalli (Deceased) and 3 others Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.Tmt.R.Sundaravalli (Deceased) 2.Mr.R.Krishnan 3.Tmt.Malavika Vinodkumar 4.Mrs.R.Lavanya (The first petitioner was died) (Petitioners 2 to 4 are recognized as Legal Heirs of the deceased 1st petitionerand the amendment carried out as per orderdated 29.07.2025 in A.No.3536/25 in O.P.No.439/2024) PetitionersPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 39 of 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 6 of O.S. Rules, praying that a Succession Certificate may be granted to the 2nd petitioner with power to collect securities to receive interest and dividends on and negotiate and transfer the securities specified in the schedules A & B hereto. (Prayer amended as per order dated 29.07.2025 in A.No.3537 of 2025 in O.P.No.439 of 2024)For Petitioners : Mr.V.Arvind RajagopalORDERThe petitioners seek Succession Certificate in favour of the 2nd petitioner, in respect o...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »