Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R.Sivakumar Vs The State Rep. by

R.Sivakumar vs The State Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Aug 21, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1836754

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/9507/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.Sivakumar

Respondent

The State Rep. by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 21.08.2025coram:the hon'ble mr.justice n.sathish kumar w.p.no.9507 of 2023 & w.m.p.no.9576 of 2023 r.sivakumar ... petitionerversus1. the state rep. by2. shivakumar3. a.s.senthil kumar4. m.vivek5. nithyanandan6. r.sathiyalakshmi7. s.thenmozhi8. a.tamilarasi9. a.sumathi10. venkata ramesh kumar11. p.n.karthikeyan12. n.maheshbabu 13.k.balasubramaniyam14. r.sivakumar15. r.ganesan page no.1 of 416. k.r.naveen17. p.ramachandran18. t.yavana kathiravan19. v.alaguvel20. r.m.valliammai21. ashish bali22. dr.s.ravichandran ... respondentsprayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of constitution of india for issuance of writ of declaration declaring the auction sale conducted dated 09.03.2023 in lieu of na.ka.no.28901/2013/11 issued by the 1st respondent as null and void. for petitioner : ms.l.srilekha mr.r.rajarajan for respondents : mr.l.m.d.muhilan of r1 additional public prosecutor ms.anandha gomathy for r2 mr.l.rajendran for r19orderthe present writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of declaration declaring the auction sale conducted dated 09.03.2023 in lieu of na.ka.no.28901/2013/11 issued by the 1st respondent as null and void. page no.2 of 42. when the petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.3. recording the said submission and the endorsement made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs. index: yes/no internet: yes/nospeaking order / non speaking orderssd to the state rep. by page no.3 of 4n.sathish kumar, j.ssd page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P.No.9507 of 2023 & W.M.P.No.9576 of 2023 R.Sivakumar ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State rep. By

2. Shivakumar

3. A.S.Senthil Kumar

4. M.Vivek

5. Nithyanandan

6. R.Sathiyalakshmi

7. S.Thenmozhi

8. A.Tamilarasi

9. A.Sumathi

10. Venkata Ramesh Kumar

11. P.N.Karthikeyan

12. N.Maheshbabu 13.K.Balasubramaniyam

14. R.Sivakumar

15. R.Ganesan Page No.1 of 4

16. K.R.Naveen

17. P.Ramachandran

18. T.Yavana Kathiravan

19. V.Alaguvel

20. R.M.Valliammai

21. Ashish Bali

22. Dr.S.Ravichandran ... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Declaration declaring the auction sale conducted dated 09.03.2023 in lieu of Na.Ka.No.28901/2013/11 issued by the 1st respondent as null and void. For Petitioner : Ms.L.Srilekha Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.L.M.D.Muhilan of R1 Additional Public Prosecutor Ms.Anandha Gomathy for R2 Mr.L.Rajendran for R19

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Declaration declaring the auction sale conducted dated 09.03.2023 in lieu of Na.Ka.No.28901/2013/11 issued by the 1st respondent as null and void. Page No.2 of 4

2. When the petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.

3. Recording the said submission and the endorsement made by the

learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

Speaking Order / Non Speaking order

ssd To The State rep. By Page No.3 of 4

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

ssd Page No.4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial