J.Vanitha vs State Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Aug 21, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1835676

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1835676
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran
Decided On: Aug 21, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/8708/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

J.Vanitha

Respondent

State Rep. by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 21.08.2025coramthe hon'ble dr.justice g.jayachandran j.vanitha ... petitioner vs. the state rep.by inspector of police (crime no.120 of 2024) ... respondent prayer : criminal original petition filed under section 438 of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with crime no.120 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. for petitioner : mr.j.h.magesh for intervenor : mr.ponraj for respondent : mr.s.vinoth kumar government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 420, 468 and 506(1) of ipc, in crime no.120 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.2. the fourth anticipatory bail petition by the suspected accused inconnection with crime no.120 of 2024, registered on 15.04.2024 for offences under sections 420, 468 and 506(1) of ipc. the very fact that even after the dismissal of three anticipatory bail petitions, the petitioner has not been arrested by the respondent police would go to show that the apprehension of the petitioner is unfounded.3. hence, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. dna to 1.the v metropolitan magistrate court, egmore. 2.the inspector of police (crime no.120 of 2024) 3.the public prosecutor, high court of madras.dr.g.jayachandran, j.dna

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.08.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN J.Vanitha ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep.by Inspector of Police (Crime No.120 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.120 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.J.H.Magesh For Intervenor : Mr.Ponraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 506(1) of IPC, in Crime No.120 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The fourth anticipatory bail petition by the suspected accused in

connection with Crime No.120 of 2024, registered on 15.04.2024 for offences under Sections 420, 468 and 506(1) of IPC. The very fact that even after the dismissal of three anticipatory bail petitions, the petitioner has not been arrested by the respondent police would go to show that the apprehension of the petitioner is unfounded.

3. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. dna To 1.The V Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore. 2.The Inspector of Police (Crime No.120 of 2024) 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

dna

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties J.Vanitha vs State Rep. by Same Judge Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran