Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Management Vs The Appellate Authority

The Management vs The Appellate Authority

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Aug 21, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1836780

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/9614/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Management

Respondent

The Appellate Authority

Excerpt

.....in p.g.a no. 47 of 2021 dated 23.02.2022 quash the same. for petitioner(s): mr.c.deepak kumar for respondent(s): mr.m.jayanthy agp for r1 and r2 mr.m.stalin for r3orderthe writ petition is filed seeking for quashment of the records of the second respondent in p.g.a.no.47 of 2021 dated 23.02.202.2. this court by order dated 06.08.2025 has passed the following order“ the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that if interest at the rate of 10% is worked out a sum of rs.8,637/- is payable to the respondent and the said sum would be paid towards full and final settlement of the respondent's claim.2. the respondent is ready to receive the same towards full and final settlement.3. post the matter on 14.08.2025.4. the learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to bring the amount by way of a demand draft in favour of the respondent”3. today, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo ofcompliance and submitted that, as per order dated 06.08.2025, a sum of rs.8,637/- has been deposited in favour of the third respondent by way of a demand draft as full and final settlement and the copy of the demand draft dated 18.08.2025, bearing no.039911, drawn in favour of mr.n.subramanian, has been filed along with proof of compliance.4. today, before this court, the above mentioned demand draft (dd) is handed over to mr.n.stalin.5. as the condition imposed upon the petitioner has been complied with, this writ petition stands closed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.k. surender, j.21-08-2025 jai index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no internet: yes/no to 1.the appellate authority for payment of gratuity-cum-joint commissioner of labour, office of the appellate authority for payment of gratuity-cum-joint commissioner of 2.the assistant commissioner of labour (gratuity) office of joint commissioner ofk. surender, j.jai 21-08-2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-08-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and WMP.No.9665 of 2023 The Management K-678 Coimbatore Co-operative printing Society Ltd, Rep. by its Manager C.V.Rajan, S/o.C.Velayudham, No.1545, Trichy Road, Coimbatore-641 018. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Appellate Authority for Payment of Gratuity-Cum-Joint Commissioner of Labour, Office of The Appellate Authority for Payment of Gratuity-Cum-Joint Commissioner of 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Gratuity) Office of Joint Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore.

3.N.Subramanian Respondent(S) PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent/ Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Gratuity), in P.G.A No. 47 of 2021 dated 23.02.2022 quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Deepak Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Jayanthy AGP for R1 And R2 Mr.M.Stalin for R3

ORDER

The Writ Petition is filed seeking for quashment of the records of the second respondent in P.G.A.No.47 of 2021 dated 23.02.202.

2. This Court by order dated 06.08.2025 has passed the following order

“ The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that if interest at the rate of 10% is worked out a sum of Rs.8,637/- is payable to the respondent and the said sum would be paid towards full and final settlement of the respondent's claim.

2. The respondent is ready to receive the same towards full and final settlement.

3. Post the matter on 14.08.2025.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to bring the amount by way of a Demand Draft in favour of the respondent”

3. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo of

compliance and submitted that, as per order dated 06.08.2025, a sum of Rs.8,637/- has been deposited in favour of the third respondent by way of a demand draft as full and final settlement and the copy of the Demand Draft dated 18.08.2025, bearing No.039911, drawn in favour of Mr.N.Subramanian, has been filed along with proof of compliance.

4. Today, before this Court, the above mentioned Demand Draft (DD) is handed over to Mr.N.Stalin.

5. As the condition imposed upon the petitioner has been complied with, this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

K. SURENDER, J.

21-08-2025 Jai Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To 1.The Appellate Authority for Payment of Gratuity-Cum-Joint Commissioner of Labour, Office of The Appellate Authority for Payment of Gratuity-Cum-Joint Commissioner of 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Gratuity) Office of Joint Commissioner of

K. SURENDER, J.

jai 21-08-2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial