Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Poopandi Vs. State through the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.123 of 2014 in C.C.No.36 of 2014, dated 04.05.2015, on the file of the Special Court for Trial Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Sivagangai.) 1. A3 in C.C.No.36 of 2014 (originally C.C.No.17 of 2008), on the file of the learned Special Judge under P.C.Act, Sivagangai, in this revision canvases the correctness of dismissal of his discharge petition filed in Crl.M.P.No.123 of 2014. 2. In connection with a Scheme framed by the Government for the Adi - Dravidars to be managed by the Department of Animal Husbandry, allegations have been made as against certain public servants. In this connection, F.I.R., in Crime No.5 of 2001, under Sections 120-B I.P.C., r/w 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(c) of P.C.Act and Section 120-B I.P.C., r/w Sections 409, 420, 467, 471 I.P.C., r/w 467, 477-A and 167 I.P.C., has been registered by Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corrupt...
A.S. Mallika Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Sivagan ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register a case/FIR on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 23.6.2016 and investigate into the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register a case/FIR on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 23.6.2016 and investigate into the case. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that petition enquiry is pending in this case, the respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the la...
G. Renganayaki Vs. The Inspector General of Registration, Department o ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned proceedings of the second respondent vide I.No.4/AA1/2015, dated 31.12.2015 and to quash the same and further to direct the third respondent to refund the excess stamp duty and registration fees of Rs.1,96,500/- collected from the Petitioner for the registration of document No.323 of 2016 at Chokkikulam Sub-Registrar's Office, Madurai with interest at 18% per annum from the date of registration I.e., 12.1.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 3. 4. According to the Petitioner, some properties were purchased out of herself and from her husband's income in favour of her deceased son Dr.G.Kannan, even when he was not employed and earning. As such, even before his death, she her...
M. Mohammed Iqbal Vs. The Inspector General of Registration Department ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take necessary steps to cancel the sale deed dated 14.9.1994 in Document No.642/1994 before the 3rd respondent and implement the order of the 1st respondent in his proceedings Mu.Mu.No.47149/U3/15 dated 27.10.2015.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Government Advocate appearing for R-1 to R-3. In respect of R-4, Court notice was served on 14.06.2016 and today, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, there is no appearance on her behalf either in person or through the Learned Counsel. 2. According to the petitioner, one Modeen Abdul Hameed (since deceased) executed a sale deed in favour of 4th respondent and the same was registered on the file of the 3rd respondent. The stand of the petitioner is that Modeen Abdul Hameed had no right to execute the sale deed in favour of the 4th respondent, because of the reason t...
G. Pushpa Rani Vs. The Executive Officer, Selection Grade Town Panchay ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the Respondent in a.d.m.k.ma.No.115/2015-16, dated 5.10.2015 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondent to grant plan approval and order of licence to construct the building in the Petitioner's property bearing S.No.276/2B and 283/1 measuring a total extent of 1058.11 sq.ft in Mission School Street, Ward No.15, Kalakkadu, Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Tirunelveli District.) 1. Mr.M.Maharaja, learned counsel on record for the Petitioner has circulated a letter, dated 29.06.2016 to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The said letter is placed on record. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs....
S. Anitha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent to file the final report in Crime No.51 of 2016 dated 02.03.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.51 of 2016 dated 02.03.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents, who would submit that the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed within a period of six months. 3. In view of the above submission, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.51 of 2016 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this ord...
Savithiri Vs. The Assistant Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Tamil ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 11.04.2016 passed in W.P.(MD) No.18943 of 2015 by allowing the Writ Appeal.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. This Writ Appeal is filed by the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.18943 of 2015 as against the order passed by the learned Single Judge closing the writ petition by order dated 11.04.2016. 2.The writ petitioner filed the Writ Petition above mentioned, for issuing a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent herein, the Assistant Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, to give electricity service connection to the appellant with regard to Door No.1/8-1, Plot No.4, in Krishnanagar, Cholanmaligai, in Survey No.145/4B, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District. The writ petitioner claimed to have purchased the plot measuring to an extent of 1800 square feet in the lay out known as Krishnanagar in Cholanmaligai Village, and got patta changed in her name. According to the petitioner, she has constructed a ...
M. Moorthy Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul District and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 6.4.2016 within the period stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2.By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3.No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4.The grievance of the Petitioner is that he had addressed a communication, dated 6.4.2016 to the Second Respondent/The Tahsildar, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District, praying for issuance of patta in respect of S.F.No.36/1 of Kodaikanal Village, measuring an extent of 0.76 cents. 5.It comes to be known that the Petitioner, on numerous occasions, had submitted Petitions praying for issuance of patta and it all proved futile. Hence, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 6.Considering the fact that the Petitioner's representation, dated 6.4.2016 is pending before the Sec...
N. Ponnappan Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Customs Tuticorin Customs ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to restrain the delivery of 18 containers of raw cashew to any other 3rd party based on any illegal amended bill of lading other than the Petitioner and consequently order to deliver the cargo which are kept in 2nd Respondent warehouse in bill of lading numbers 1. COSU6095467990-14.4.2016-4 Containers - 64.500MT - 860 bags 2.COSU6095468160-14.4.2016-8 Containers - 129.375MT - 1725 bags 3. COSU6095468170-14.4.2016-3 Containers - 48.000MT - 640 bags 4. COSU6095468180 -14.4.2016-3 Containers - 48.375MT - 645 bags TOTAL 18 Containers - 290.250 MT - 3870 bags to the Petitioner only according to law based on his representation dated 08.05.2016.) Order: 1. The Petitioner has focused the instant writ petition before this Court praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the First Respondent to restrain the delivery of 18 containers of 'Raw Cas...
A. Dawood Bi Vs. Palanisamy District Collector, Tiruchirappalli, and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
(Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order passed in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.20015 of 2014, dated 10.12.2014.) 1. It is represented on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 4 that Respondent No.5 in the Writ Petition has filed W.P.No.17542 of 2014 before the Honourable Division Bench of this Court and obtained an order of interim stay. As such, it is represented that the present Contempt Petition would not lie. Also, the Petitioner has filed the present Contempt Petition without mentioning about the interim stay granted by the Honourable Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.17542 of 2014. 2. In view of the above, the Contempt Petition stands closed....