Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Ramaiah Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to implead the petitioner as a party in the pending proceedings before him in Na.Ka.No.11138/2012/D3 dated 28.4.2015 and pass orders on merits after affording opportunity to the petitioner.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the First Respondent/District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai. 4. However, in respect of Respondent Nos.2 to 4, to avoid an avoidable delay, issuance of notice to them is dispensed with by this Court. 5. At the outset, it is to be pointed out that the petitioner had filed a petition in Na.Ka.No.11138/2012/D3 before the First Respondent/District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai, seeking to implead himself in the pending appeal. 6. At this stage, Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Learned Government Advocate informs this Court that the petitioner's i...
Theni District Cable (TDC TV) Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Ar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.03.2014 and to amend the Provisional Allotment Orders in PLC No.55133, 55192, 55243 and 55268 dated 28.01.2014, 29.01.2014, 29.01.2014 and 30.01.2014 in the name of Theni District Cable (TDC TV) a partnership firm, represented by its Partners S.Tamilan, V. Lakshmanan and S.Loganathan at D.No.60, NRT, Main Road, theni-625 531 and grant such other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
K. Selvarani Vs. The District Collector, Trichirappalli District and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner, dated 23.5.2016 and to grant patta in her name to the land situated in S.Nos.295/6, 295/9 and 294/5 situated at Periyakurukkai Village, Lalkudi Taluk, Trichirappalli District within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1 .There is no representation for the Petitioner. 2. According to the Petitioner, he originally purchased the property and submitted an application before the Second Respondent/The Tahsildar, Lalkudi Taluk,Trichirappalli District in the year 2014 itself. However, till date, no orders have been passed by the Second Respondent. 3. It is the case of the Petitioner that due to the inaction on the part of the Second Respondent, he had suffered much and again, he approached the Second Respondent in person at his Office and submitted a representation and prayed for issuance of ...
B. Ranjith Kumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.06.2016 and take necessary action within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.06.2016 and take necessary action. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on the complaint dated 17.06.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.487 of 2016 dated 03.07.2016 for offences under Sections 147, 448 and 379 IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
K. Karuppasamy Vs. The Regional Manager, Pandian Grama Bank, Virudhuna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to permit the Petitioner to open the Locker No.C6 and further to close the Fixed Deposit No.FDR.211300018SB3803 within the time fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. According to the Petitioner, he is holding an Account No.521501000003803 with the Second Respondent/Pandian Grama Bank, Pudukkottai Branch, Pudukkottai and also Locker No.C6 in his name. 3. It is his stand that on 17.2.2014, while he was travelling from Usilankulam on his bike, he had missed the Bank Pass-book, and Locker Key provided by the Second Respondent. In spite of diligent search, he could not find the Bank Pass-book and Locker Key. Therefore, he filed a complaint before the Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkoil Police station, Sivagangai District and obtained Receipt No.129 of 2014. Thereafter, on 7,3,2014, the Petitioner submitted a r...
Ramanathan Vs. State, represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police Devip ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge / Presiding Officer Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai in Crl.M.P.No.1450 of 2015 vide its order dated 02.02.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the above said learned Special Judge to return the vehicle namely Lancer Car (Black Color) bearings its registration No.TN33 AB6162 in connection with the case in Crime No.8 of 2015 pending on the file of the respondent to the petitioner.) 1. The Car Owner / A1 aggrieved by the dismissal of his property return petition in Cr.M.P.No.1450 of 2015, by the learned Special Judge under E.C. and N.D.P.S.Act, Pudukkottai, has directed this revision. 2. In connection with Crime No.8 of 2015, Devipattinam Police seized a Lancer Car (TN33 AB6162). The Car has been produced with Form-95 to the Court. It has become a case-property.The revisi...
S. Muniyandi Vs. The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant Patta for petitioner's property bearing Old Survey/Paimash No.1189, now known as Survey No.127/6, an extent of 65.45 cents situated in Sevalpatti Village, Karyapatti Taluk, Aruppukottai Sub Division of Virudhunagar District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.03.2016 within the period stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his grand father Arumuga Nadar, S/o.Valaguruva Nadar, had acquired a property bearing Old Survey/Paimash No.1189, now known as Survey No.127/6, measuring an extent of 65.45 cents situated in Sevalpatti Village, Karyapatti Taluk, Aruppukottai Sub Division, Virudhunagar District, by means of purchase on 02.05.1917 (vide Registration No....
J. Gnanadurai and Others Vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue patta to the petitioners for the land measuring Western 1 Acre 33 Cents in Survey No.28/4B and Survey No.28/4C1, Thathaneri Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District and to pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue patta to the petitioners for the land measuring Eastern 40 Cents in Survey No.28/4B and Survey No.28/4C1, Thathaneri Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District and to pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The facts in both cases are not in dispute that the petitioners are the lawful owners of their respective properties. 2. It appears that the Tamil Nadu State Housing Board issued a notification in G.O.R....
Selvarajan Vs. Rengasubathra
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the order of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi dated 11.02.2016 in C.A.No.38 of 2015, modifying the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kovilpatti in M.C.No.2 of 2013 by order dated 01.07.2015 under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act and set aside the same.) 1. This is an husband's revision as against his wife. 2. The revision petitioner and the respondent are blessed with a child, but not with a happy married life. The boy is 6 years old. He is a school going boy. Difference of opinion arose between the spouses. They got separated. The boy is with his mother. 3. Claiming shared residence, compensation, maintenance, return of her srithana articles and also protection from domestic violence, the wife has filed M.C.No.2 of 2013 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kovilpatti as against her husband and his parents. Evidence ...
B.T.K. Educational Trust, Rep. by its Correspondent B.T. Arasakumar Vs ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to process the petitioner's Application dated 27.12.2012 for starting Arts and Science College taking into consideration the recommendations of the 2nd and 3rd respondents by their proceedings vide Na.Ka.Aa1/526/2012 dated 24.05.2013, Na.Ka.No.2520/A4/2015 dated 23.4.2015 respectively in light of the petitioner's compliance communication dated 23.09.2015 within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard the Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondents. 2. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 3. According to the petitioner/Educational Trust, it wanted to start an Arts and Science College under the name and style of 'Kokila Arts and Science College' at Viralimalai, Pudukkottai District and in this regard, it projected an application dated 27.12.2012, which was duly acknowledged by the second respondent/District Revenu...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »