Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Rengasamy Vs. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Trichy
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to close the petitioner's loan account No.30293017255 under OTS scheme letter dated 05.01.2016 and return back the Petitioner's title deeds which was mortgaged by the petitioner in the loan account on the basis of the Petitioner's representation, dated 11.06.2016.) 1. Heard the Petitioner / Party-in-person. 2. According to the Petitioner, he is a small farmer, owning small extent of agricultural lands and obtained a loan of Rs.5,50,000/- from the Respondent / State Bank of India, Manaparai, Trichy District, on 12.04.2007, in account No.30293017255, for purchasing Tractor for his agricultural purpose. He had mortgaged title deeds pertaining to his property and on the basis of the security offered by him, the Respondent / Bank had sanctioned the loan for purchasing the Tractor. 3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that due to failure of mon...
A. Ramachandran Vs. The Special Commissioner and Director of Survey an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to enter the petitioner's name in all revenue records including computer chitta for S.No.151/8 with an extent of 0.11.5 Ares (29 Cents) Merpanaikadu Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District within a reasonable time frame.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents 1 and 2. 4. According to the petitioner, the land measuring an extent of 0.11.5 ares (29 cents) in Sy.No.151/8, Merpanaikadu Village, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District belong to him ancestrally and he is in possession and enjoyment of the same from the time of his ancestors. He is using the subject property along with the adjoining lands as a house site by putting up three houses for residential purpose of himself and his sons. The aforesaid property is enclosed with fence and...
Babu Florence Debora Vs. The Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police S ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Sections 439(2) read with 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in Cr.M.P.No.4046 of 2015, dated 22.12.2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Tuticorin. Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Sections 439(2) read with 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in Cr.M.P.No.4047 of 2015, dated 22.12.2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Tuticorin. Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Sections 439(2) read with 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in Cr.M.P.No.3967 of 2015, dated 17.12.2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Tuticorin.) 1. These petitions have been filed praying to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the accused Nos.1 to 6 and 8, who have been shown as respondents 2 to 4 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.2868 of 2016, second respondent in C...
Lakshmanan Vs. Karuthapandi and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 439(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to cancel the Anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent herein made in Cr.M.P.No.5859 of 2015, dated 01.10.2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai.) This petition has been filed to cancel the Anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent herein, in Cr.M.P.No.5859 of 2015, dated 01.10.2015 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai. 2. The first respondent and other accused have been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471 of IPC. The first respondent/A1 and A2 filed anticipatory bail petition before the Principal Sessions Court, Madurai, in Cr.M.P.No.5859 of 2015. By order, dated 01.10.2015, the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to the first respondent/A1 and dismissed the anticipatory bail petition with regard to A2. Now, the petitioner has come out with the present petition for cancellation of anticipatory ...
Amuthapriya Vs. The Superintendent of Central Prison, Madurai and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to grant 10 days leave (parole) to the petitioner's father, namely, Varatharajan, S/o. Arunachalam, who is undergoing sentence as 5 years convict in Central Prison, Madurai to participate her mother Meenakshi's funeral ceremony function.) 1. The writ petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to grant 10 days leave / parole to the prisoner / petitioner's father, namely, Varatharajan, S/o. Arunachalam, who is in confinement on account of conviction for 5 years imposed by the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai in Spl.S.C.No.7 of 2014. The petitioner's father is confined to the Central Prison, Madurai from 28.04.2016; that his wife, Meenakshi, died on 10.07.2016 and that he has to conduct funeral rituals to his wife. In this regard, a representation has been submitted to the jail authorities on 11.07.2016 by...
Chandra Sekaran and Another Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.214 of 2008 pending for trial on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Madurai and quash the same.) 1. Section 482 Cr. P.C., saves inherent power of the Court. Such inherent power can be exercised either to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. Invoking such inherent power, this petition has been filed to quash the proceedings on the ground that the continuance would amount to abuse of the process of the Court. 2. A case in Crime No.1956 of 2007 has been registered under Sections 468, 471, 452, 294(b) and 506(1) IPC by the 1st respondent against the petitioners. After completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed a charge sheet before the learned Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurai, which was taken cognizance by the Magistrate in C.C.No.214 of 2008. 3. When the matter is taken ...
V. Santha Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue Legal Heir Certificate to the petitioner by considering the petitioner's application dated 31.03.2016 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the petitioner, her late husband A.Sadhanantham was working as Lab Assistant in American College, Madurai. The marriage between her and her husband viz., Sadhanantham was solemnized on 27.10.1978. Out of the said wedlock, one male child viz., Vijaya Rajesh was born on 17.06.1983. It appears that her husband already got married to one Gray Chellaiah and having three children viz., S.Shanthi, S.Jeyakeerthi and S.Sathya and the said Gray Chelliah expired in the year 19...
A. Chandrasekaran Vs. Chithiraikani
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the Contemnor/Respondent for having committed the Contempt of Court by disobeying the order made by this Court in W.P(MD)No.19887 of 2014, dated 14.7.2015.) 1. Today, the Contemnor/Respondent is present. On behalf of the Contemnor/Respondent, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the encroachment was evicted with the assistance of Revenue and Police on 30.05.2016 and 31.05.2015 and the 'road restored'. As such, it is the plea of the Contemnor/Respondent that the order passed in W.P(MD)No.19887 of 2014, dated 14.07.2015 has since been complied with. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact, since nothing survives for adjudication in the Contempt Petition, the present Contempt Petition is closed. The presence of the Contemnor/Respondent/Chithiraikani, is dispensed with....
S.R. Sambasivam Vs. The Tahsildar, Pattukottai Taluk
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.10.2014 for issuance of joint patta in Survey Nos.259/1 and 258/1 situate at Athikottai, Pattukkottai Taluk, Thanjavur District within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the above facts and circumstances of the case.) 1. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondent. 2. According to the petitioner, he is the family head and he is aged about 63 years. His grievance is that the omitted portion of the property is to be incorporated in the patta issued to him and in his brother's name. Otherwise, he would be put to great hardship. Furthermore, it is his stand that as per partition deed, they are enjoying the property separately and in fact, his father's brother's son namely Swaminathan had given a 'No Objectio...
T. Pappa Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Home ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the attachment made on 28.04.2003 in pursuance of the G.O.No.356 issued by the first and second respondents under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishment) Act, 1997 in respect of the petitioner's land in S.F.No.15C, 16/2 to an extent of 3108 Sq.ft registered as Document No.354 of 2000 before the fourth respondent located at Mookanakurichi Village, Karur District and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to remove the attachment made on 28.04.2003 in pursuance of the G.O.No.356 issued by the first and second respondents under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishment) Act, 1997 in respect of the petitioner's land in S.F.No.15C, 16/2 to a...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »