Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Dhanam Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to prevent the petitioner from using the pathway situates in adjacent to the petitioner's house comprising in Survey No.121/9 and 119/7, Kottagaimedu Village in the fourth respondent panchayat and consequently direct the first respondent to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 28.02.2014, within the time limit prescribed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to prevent the petitioner from using the pathway situates in adjacent to the petitioner's house comprising in Survey No.121/9 and 119/7, Kottagaimedu Village in the fourth respondent panchayat and consequently direct the first respondent to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 28...
The De-notified Tribes Welfare Association, Rep. by its President Dr. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take time bound action on the appeal filed by the Petitioner on 13.7.2015 against the order dated 8.5.2015 of the Second Respondent.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the appeal filed by the Petitioner as President of De-notified Tribes Welfare Association, Madurai addressed to the First Respondent/The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Backward Classes,Most Backward Classes and De-notified Tribes Welfare, St.George Fort, Chennai 600 006 is pending as on date without any disposal. As a matter of fact, the said appeal is filed against the order of the Commissioner of Most Back-Ward Classes and De-notified Communities Welfare(FA...
G. Thangadurai Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to G ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of punishment passed by the first respondent in his proceedings G.O.(2D)No.54, dated 05.03.2009, and quash the same as illegal and consequentially, to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Assistant Executive Engineer (A.E.E.) w.e.f. the date on which the petitioner juniors were promoted within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The order passed by the first respondent in G.O.(2D)No.54, dated 05 March, 2009, imposing the punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of twelve months without cumulative effect, besides recovery of loss, is under challenge in this Writ Petition. THE FACTS: 2. While the petitioner was working as Assistant Engineer, in the office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, Dindigul, a charge memo was issued to him by the third respondent. ...
Synam Beevi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent who is having the petitioner's house key without any lawful means or any direction or order from the Court to return back the key to her or permit her to break open her house situated at in S.No.572/17, New Ward Nos.15.4.18 in Achampudur Village, Senkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent who is having the petitioner's house key without any lawful means or any direction or order from the Court to return back the key to her or permit her to break open her house situated at in S.No.572/17, New Ward Nos.15.4.18 in Achampudur Village, Senkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that she was in absolute possession and peaceful enjoyment of the house ...
Benial Gnanadurai Vs. The Sub-Registrar, Tuticorin District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to receive and register the sale deeds from the petitioner in respect of the lands in Survey No.439 in Vasavappapuram Village, Murappanadu Sub-Registration District belonging to him with the period that may be stipuled by this Court as deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to receive and register the sale deeds from the petitioner in respect of the lands in Survey No.439 in Vasavappapuram Village, Murappanadu Sub-Registration District belonging to him. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the land measuring to an extent of 2 Acres out of 4 Acres 85 cents, on the eastern portion on the south in Survey No.439 in Vasavappapuram Village, Murappanadu Sub-Registration District belongs to the petitioner by virtue of sale deed, dated 21.02.2000 and that the land meas...
Tamilvannan Vs. The District Collector, Office of the District Collect ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to conduct survey relating to the Petitioners land measuring an extent of 1500 sq.ft in S.No.557/8 in Plot No.27, Thuvakudi Village, Trichy Taluk on the basis of his representation dated 27.6.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. There is no representation for the Petitioner. 2. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents and upon hearing his submission, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he had submitted a representation, dated 02.06.2016 before the Respondents, wherein, he had sought for the conduct of survey in respect of his land in S.No.557/8 in Plot No.27, Thuvakudi Village, Trichy Taluk. 5. At this stage, it comes to be known that the Petitioner had remitted the necessary charges ...
P. Muthumuniyandi Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to survey the Petitioner's land in Survey No.65/1 F6 for an extent of 50 cents situated at Nedungulam Village, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai and on the basis of his application dated 24.2.2016 and his representation dated 16.6.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he had addressed a representation, dated 08.06.2016 to the District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Campus, Madurai District, wherein, he had prayed for measuring his property and fixing the boundaries and in this regard, had sought for issuance of a direction to the Surveyor Subburaj and the Village Administrative Officer Devika and Village Assistant Malaichamy. The same contents of the representation, dated 08.0...
N. Shankaramagalingam Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st Respondent to consider the representation dated 22.12.2015 and pass appropriate orders in terms of the Circular No. 67 of IGR for cancellation of the documents registered on the file of the 3rd Respondent comprised in encumbrance certificate bearing Certificate No. 6680 of 2013 within the time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard the Petitioner, (party-in-person) and the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. According to the petitioner, he purchased the property of housing lay out at 17/2, Sankarankovil Kazhumadai Main Road, at plot Nos.108 to 184, Cauveri Nagar, near DNC Hostel, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District bearing resurvey No.332/A1-3 acres and 9 cents (out of 10 acres and 47 cents, south side upper portion) and 332/A2-3 acres and 53 cents (out of 10 acres and 56 cents, upper portion), totally measuring 6 acres 52...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
1. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 420, 406, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.75 of 2016, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant is running orphanages and old age homes at Kanyakumari District. The petitioner and other accused persons promised to get sanction from the Government and received a sum of Rs.14,50,000/-. But subsequently, they did not get any amount from the Government and swindled money received from the de-facto complainant. When the same was demanded by the de-facto complainant, they threatened with dire consequences and complaint case has been registered. 3. When the matter was listed on 29.06.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter adjourned today. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) submitted that the petitioner received...
R. Murugesan Vs. The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing i.e.the Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 06.05.2016 regarding refixing his Grade Pay in the Selection Grade and Special Grade on par with the Helpers serving in the Electrical Wing and to send revised pension proposals within a specified time frame.) 1. At the time of retirement, the petitioner was serving as Special Grade Helper, Water Resource Organisation, Periyar Vagai Basin Sub Division No.1, Madurai, in the Public Works Department. He was allowed to retire peacefully on 30.04.2015 and received all his retirement benefits. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that Helpers serving in the Electrical Wing of the Public Works Department are given a Grade pay of Rs.1,900/- in the ordinary scale. But such grade pay has not been given to the Helpers serving in other wings ...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »