Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

A. Deisy Vs. The District Elementary Educational Officer and Another

A. Deisy vs The District Elementary Educational Officer and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jul 22, 2016
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189646

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD).No. 12959 of 2016 W.M.P.(MD).Nos. 9762 & 9763 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Deisy

Respondent

The District Elementary Educational Officer and Another

Excerpt

.....in the panchayat union elementary school at chakkiliankulam. the next avenue of promotion to her is b.t.assistant. since 2015, she has been shown as first in the promotion panel prepared by the respondents. while so, the counseling is scheduled on 06.08.2016. according to counseling schedule, b.t.promotion should be made first and then transfer from one union to union or district to union will take place. however, the respondents herein are trying to transfer a b.t.assistant (english) working in some other union / district to the b.t.assistant (english) vacancy existing at the madurai west panchayat union middle school, athalai in order to deprive the opportunity available to the petitioner. stating all these facts, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondents, on 15.07.2016. since the said representation did not evoke any response, the petitioner is before this court. 2. mr.r.anadharaj, learned government advocate was put on notice for the respondents. 3. since the counseling is scheduled on 06.08.2016 and the petitioner has made a representation beforehand, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.07.2016, on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order or atleast before the commencement of counseling. 4. with the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners seniority at the 1st place in the Promotion panel as on 01.01.2016 for promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant (English) in Madurai west Panchayat Union and to promote and post the petitioner as BT Assistant in English in the existing vacancy of BT Assistant (English) at Madurai west panchayat union Middle school at athalai or any other vacancy in other middle school functioning under Madurai West Panchayat Union Jurisdiction.)

1. Mr.A.Deisy, is a Secondary Grade Teacher, presently serving in the Panchayat Union Elementary School at Chakkiliankulam. The next avenue of promotion to her is B.T.Assistant. Since 2015, she has been shown as first in the promotion panel prepared by the respondents. While so, the counseling is scheduled on 06.08.2016. According to counseling schedule, B.T.promotion should be made first and then transfer from one union to union or district to union will take place. However, the respondents herein are trying to transfer a B.T.Assistant (English) working in some other union / district to the B.T.Assistant (English) vacancy existing at the Madurai West Panchayat Union Middle School, Athalai in order to deprive the opportunity available to the petitioner. Stating all these facts, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondents, on 15.07.2016. Since the said representation did not evoke any response, the petitioner is before this Court.

2. Mr.R.Anadharaj, learned Government Advocate was put on notice for the respondents.

3. Since the Counseling is scheduled on 06.08.2016 and the petitioner has made a representation beforehand, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.07.2016, on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order or atleast before the commencement of counseling.

4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties A. Deisy vs The District Elementary Educational Officer and A... Same Subject Education Same Judge T. Raja
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales