Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Petitioner vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jul 22, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1189650
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Kalyanasundaram
Decided On: Jul 22, 2016
Case Number: C.M.S.A(MD)No. 17 of 2016
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Excerpt

1. the civil miscellaneous second appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law: 2. whether all the incidents and cruelty rendered by the respondent should be narrated in the notice itself? 3. whether the first appellate court is correct in rejecting the evidence of p.w.2 to p.w.4, simply they are friends of the appellant, when there is no contra evidence and legal reasoning to reject them? notice. private notice also permitted.

Full Judgment

1. The Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:

2. Whether all the incidents and cruelty rendered by the Respondent should be narrated in the notice itself?

3. Whether the First Appellate Court is correct in rejecting the evidence of P.W.2 to P.W.4, simply they are friends of the Appellant, when there is no contra evidence and legal reasoning to reject them?

Notice. Private notice also permitted.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Petitioner vs Respondent Same Subject Criminal Same Judge M. Kalyanasundaram