Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murugesan Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 26.02.2016 forwarded by the 1st respondent in reference in C.No.144/PG/Camp/COP/TRC/2016 dated 26.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 26.02.2016 forwarded by the 1st respondent in reference in C.No.144/PG/Camp/COP/TRC/2016 dated 26.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.22 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police...
S. Kamala Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register the Petitioner complaint dated 14.03.2016 on the file of the respondent Police and to investigate the same in accordance with law and also issue suitable direction against the 1st respondent to supervise the whole investigation.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 14.03.2016 on the file of the respondent police and to investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that this petitioner earlier lodged a complaint, in which, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed on 06.09.2015. Subsequently, again on 14.03.2016, on the very same set of allegations, she has lodged another complaint. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to reg...
Uma Maheswari Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 07.03.2016 received by the respondents on 08.03.2016 and take action as per law and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 07.03.2016 received by the respondents on 08.03.2016 and take action as per law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 07.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 07.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in...
Kavitha and Another Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating with the impugned notice issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.0273/2016/A4 dated 03.02.2016 in connection with the petition filed by the respondents 3 and 4 and quash the same as illegal without jurisdiction and pass further relieves as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating with the impugned notice issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.0273/2016/A4 dated 03.02.2016 in connection with the petition filed by the respondents 3 and 4 and quash the same as illegal. 2. Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.T.Senthilkumar, learned Counsel takes notice for the respondents 3 and 4. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The petitioner has chal...
Chellaiah Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 13.2.2016 and may complete the investigation of the matter within a specified period.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 13.2.2016 and may complete the investigation of the matter within a specified period. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 13.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to l...
R. Subramani Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 9.9.2015.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 9.9.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the complaint dated 09.09.2015 has been sent to the Chief Minister's Special Cell. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 09.09.2015. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. W...
J.A. Premkumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 2.2.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 2.2.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 02.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 18.02.2016. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
R. Rajathi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.2.2016 in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 4.2.2016 in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 04.02.2016, it essentially appears to be a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and her husband and that HMOP No.44 of 2015 filed by this petitioner for divorce is also pending. Her husband also filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights. Under such circumstances, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the man...
S. Suresh Vs. S. Alavandar and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree, dated 07.06.2002, made in M.C.O.P.No.674 of 2000, on the file of the Additional District/Fast Track Court [Motor Accident Claims Tribunal], Thanjavur.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree, dated 07.06.2002, made in M.C.O.P.No.674 of 2000, on the file of the Additional District/Fast Track Court [Motor Accident Claims Tribunal], Thanjavur. 2. The appellant is the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.674 of 2000. He filed M.C.O.P., claiming a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- for the injury sustained by him in the accident occurred on 09.07.1999. Respondents 1 and 3 are the owners of the vehicle involved in the accident. Respondents 2 and 4 are the insurer of the vehicle belonging to the respondents 1 and 3. 3. Facts of the case: (i) According to the appellant, he was travelling in a motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN-22-6289, belonging to the ...
Muthiah Pillai Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.12.2015.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.12.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 29.12.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 09.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »