Chennai Madurai Court February 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Management, Balu Transport Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-08-2016
(Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent relating to the award in I.D.No.79/1994 dated 11.12.2007 and quash the same.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ so as to call for records relating to the order passed in I.D.No.79 of 1994 dated 11.12.2007 by the first respondent and quash the same. 2. It is averred in the petition that the second respondent by name Sundaram has served as a driver in the transport company of the petitioner and from 17.09.1993 he failed to report his duty and subsequently various notices have been issued and finally an Advocate has been appointed as Enquiry Officer and he has given so many enquiry notices thereby calling upon the second respondent to make his appearance for enquiry. But the second respondent has not turned ...
Sankarankovil Sarvodaya Sangh through its Secretary Vs. D.S. Mariappan ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-04-2016
(Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records of the second respondent's order dated 31.07.2007 made in C.P.No.105 of 1997 and quash the same.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records of the second respondent's order dated 31.07.2007 passed in Claim Petition No.105 of 1997 and quash the same. 2. The first respondent herein as petitioner has filed Claim Petition No.105 of 1997 under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, wherein the present writ petitioner has been shown as sole respondent. 3. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner has served in the society of the respondent. On 12.07.1996, a charge memo has been issued and consequently he has been suspended from service. From 28.11.1996 to 30.09...
A. Rajakafur Vs. The District Magistrate and Collector, Virudhunagar D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-01-2016
(Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 4th respondent in his proceedings made in Na.Ka.A1/12966/2014 dated 14.11.15 and to quash the same and forbear the respondents from proceeding under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, until disposal of the Appeal before the 5th respondent in AIR.No.650 of 2015 filed by the petitioner under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act.) 1. In W.P(MD)No.16009 of 2015, third respondent herein/auction purchaser of the property, subject matter of sale certificate dated 29.03.2014 issued by the Indian Bank, Sivakasi Branch, Virudhunagar District, has sought for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 therein, to take physical possession of the said property and hand over the same, to the writ petitioner, by implementing the order made by the District Collector and District Magistrate, Virudhunagar District, first respondent therein, in Roc.No.E3/24710/...
M. Annadurai Vs. The District Collector, Pudukottai District and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.01.2016 and to take immediate action to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 3 and 4 in public pathway lies in S.No.582/23 in Vellanoor Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukottai District.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Though the petitioner has sought for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider his representation, dated 13.01.2016 and to take immediate action to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 3 and 4 on the public pathway, which lies in S.No.582/23, Vellanoor Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukottai District, and filed the present writ petition as a Public Interest Litigation, at para 3 of the supporting affidavit, he has contended that his right to approach the main road, alleged to have been encroached is infringed, thus, indicating that there is an element of pri...