Chennai Madurai Court February 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Senthil Vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to accept the petitioner as an Advocate for enrollment of Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry on the basis of the petitioner's application dated 18.10.2013 submitted before the respondent.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. The petitioner, who has completed his B.L., Graduation in 2013 could not enroll, as an Advocate, on account of two criminal cases have been registered against him in Crime No.163 of 2010 and Crime No.23 of 2013 respectively on the file of the Inspector of Police, Veeravanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 2. Material on record discloses that in Crime No.163 of 2010, on the file of Inspector of Police, Veeravanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli District, after investigation, charge sheet has been filed, which was taken on file C.C.No.293 of 2010, on the file of learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi....
K. Durairaj @ Venkidasamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to protect his life and liberty and for surveying the land to an extent of 1 acre 60 cents situated in Survey No.137 Vadakarai Village periyakulam Taluk Theni District.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to protect his life and liberty and for surveying the land to an extent of 1 acre 60 cents situated in Survey No.137 Vadakarai Village periyakulam Taluk Theni District. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the petition, it is clear that there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4 with regard to the enjoyment of the property in question. Under such circumstances, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent pol...
Duraithangaraju Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Thanjavur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on a complaint given by one Arunachalam against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.52 of 2016 before the 3rd respondent. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. With the above direction, this petition is ...
S. Selvam Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the illegal Gravel quarrying operations of the 6th respondent made in the petitioner's village i.e Vembangkudi Village, situating in Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2016 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble High Court.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. ''A permanent resident of Vembangkudi Village, Keelakandani Post, Sivagangai District and claiming to be a Public Interest Litigant, has filed the present Writ Petition, for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the District Collector, Sivagangai District, 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the 6th respondent, alleging illegal Gravel quarrying in Vembangkudi Village, situating in Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District based on his representation dated 01.02.2016. 2. Supporting the relief sought...
A. Raja Hussain Vs. The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk Office, Virudhuna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to measure and demarcate the property in Survey No.181/7A in Patta No.617 in V.Nangoor Village, Virudhunagar District as per petitioner application dated 02.11.2015.) 1. The petitioner seeks for measuring and demarcating the property of his land, by considering his application dated 02.11.2015. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though he made an application on 02.11.2015, till date, his request has not been considered by the respondents, which resulted in the filing of the present Writ Petition. 3. In view of the above, without expressing any view on the claim of the petitioner, the respondents are directed to consider the request of the petitioner seeking for measuring and demarcating the property of his land by considering his application dated 02.11.2015, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the...
S. Rosali Arockiamari Vs. G. Mahalakshmi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.10.2015 made in O.S.SR.No.978 of 2015, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruchirappalli.) 1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.10.2015, made in O.S.SR.No.978 of 2015, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruchirappalli. 2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff. The respondents are defendants. 3. The revision petitioner purchased the Plot No.53 measuring an extent of 1200 Sq. Ft, in the year 1994. According to the petitioner, next to the said Plot there was a vacant site measuring an extent of 600 Sq.ft. The petitioner took possession of said vacant land and she is in possession and enjoyment of the same without any obstruction. The petitioner constructed the house and she is in possession by obtaining electricity service connection and other facilities and also paying the taxes to ...
V. Pandiaraj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 3rd respondent police from coercing the petitioner to execute release deed in favour of 5th and 6th respondents by interfering in a civil dispute in O.S.No.72 of 2008 on the file of District Munsif Court, Senkottai in respect of the property in Resurvey No.79/5B and 80/5 Ayakudi, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to forbear the 3rd respondent police from coercing the petitioner to execute release deed in favour of 5th and 6th respondents by interfering in a civil dispute in O.S.No.72 of 2008 on the file of District Munsif Court, Senkottai in respect of the property in Resurvey No.79/5B and 80/5 Ayakudi, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 2. Heard Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned counsel for R5 and R6 and Mr.R.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Plea...
T.N. Vidyanandan Vs. Sabita Devi, The Secretary to Government, Chennai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor for her wilful and wanton disobedience of the order to comply with the direction of this Hon'ble Court on 09.02.2015 passed in W.P(MD)No.14178 of 2014.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Alleging disobedience of the order, made in W.P(MD)No.14178 of 2014, dated 09.02.2015, Mr.T.N.Vidyanandan/party-in-person, has filed the present contempt petition, to punish the respondent/Secretary to Government, Department of School Education, Chennai. 2. Facts in nutshell, giving rise to allegation of wilful and wanton disobedience of the order, made in W.P(MD)No.14178 of 2014, dated 09.02.2015, are that the party-in-person, has challenged G.O.No.2080, Education (D3) Department, dated 14.09.1977, and sought for a declaration, to declare the Minority Schools (Recognition and Payment) Rules, 1977, as inoperative, in the light of Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India. 3. Before the Hon'ble Division Bench, in W....
P. Balakrishnan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission and protection for yearly Festival of Arulmigu Sri Pattathalachi Amman Temple situated at Thiruvasi Village Manachanallur Taluk Trichy District for the Nattupura Kalainigalchi it consists cultural activities and Gramia Padalgal programme on 02.03.2016 at night.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to grant permission and protection for yearly Festival of Arulmigu Sri Pattathalachi Amman Temple situated at Thiruvasi Village Manachanallur Taluk Trichy District for the Nattupura Kalainigalchi it consists cultural activities and Gramia Padalgal programme on 02.03.2016 at night. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct Adal Padal in connection with the festival of Arulmigu Sri Pattathalachi Amman Temple situated at Thiruvasi Village, Manach...
The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order, dated 29.09.2015, made in W.P.(MD)No.17561 of 2015.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to an order, made in W.P.(MD)No.17561 of 2015, dated 29.09.2015, by which, a learned single Judge has directed the Secretary to the Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9, 1st appellant, to pass final orders, on the charge memo, in Na.Ka.No.29948/2004/F 1-2, dated 30.06.2004. 2. Material on record discloses that when the respondent was working in Dindigul Municipality, he was issued with a Charge memo, dated 30.08.2004, for certain irregularities, alleging that he has caused loss to the Dindigul Municipality. Reading of G.O.(D)No.150, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, dated 27.04.2006, indicates that the respondent has been transferred from Dindigul Municipality and posted at Karur Municipality. By the above said Government Order, the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »